Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:12 PM Nov 2014

How the hell do you RUN OVER a protester ON VIDEO and be "not currently under arrest"????

Last edited Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:07 AM - Edit history (1)

A vehicle plowed through a group of demonstrators in Minneapolis Tuesday afternoon during a march and rally in the wake of a Missouri grand jury decision not to indict a white police officer for fatally shooting a black teenager.

A solidarity rally and march for Michael Brown, who was killed by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson, was planned Tuesday near the Minneapolis Police Department’s 3rd Precinct headquarters at Lake Street and Minnehaha Avenue S.

A Star Tribune reporter who is at the rally says that witnesses say the vehicle started honking at protesters blocking the intersection before running down a woman around the start of the rally at 4:30 p.m.


http://m.startribune.com/local/minneapolis/283891941.html

Video at the link. *WARNING: GRAPHIC!*


What the ever-loving FUCK????


*****Edited to add second video, courtesy of Travis_0004*****

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How the hell do you RUN OVER a protester ON VIDEO and be "not currently under arrest"???? (Original Post) arcane1 Nov 2014 OP
If the episode was the result of illness, you would not be arrested. Hoppy Nov 2014 #1
Arrested is a legally defined state of custody. ManiacJoe Nov 2014 #3
OMG look at that! maced666 Nov 2014 #2
If you arrest them, you have to tell them about that right to remain silent. jeff47 Nov 2014 #4
If there were injuries, I am sure there Jenoch Nov 2014 #5
so it's ok to ram them and drive off with people on the hood and LiberalElite Nov 2014 #8
Lots of gloating going on over the verdict, as you can see. Rex Nov 2014 #11
I pity the fool who is still crossing the street when the light turns green! arcane1 Nov 2014 #16
I'm glad I know that now! Always a pain in the ass waiting for pedestrians. Rex Nov 2014 #18
When I was stationed in W. Germany in the early 70's, GGJohn Nov 2014 #37
We don't see how/when the people got on the hood and under the wheel (nt) Recursion Nov 2014 #13
So you are saying people don't have the right of way, but cars do. Rex Nov 2014 #21
Why do you assume the driver knew the person was in front of his tire? Recursion Nov 2014 #27
They could see them, go look at the video. Rex Nov 2014 #29
Well *I* can't see them in the post 22 video, except those jumping on the hood Recursion Nov 2014 #40
Why did the driver move over the the right behind a crowd of people Rex Nov 2014 #43
I assume because he's an entitled asshole who was in a hurry Recursion Nov 2014 #46
Entitled asshole, I think that about sums it up. Rex Nov 2014 #51
Where did I write ANYTHING that would result in a reoly such as yours? Jenoch Nov 2014 #28
"Subaru Outback? The driver probably votes for Democrats." WTF does that mean? arcane1 Nov 2014 #35
Really? I doubt that, you cannot run over someone with a car it is illegal. Rex Nov 2014 #9
HOLY FKG SHT! nt LiberalElite Nov 2014 #6
I wondering what those people are doing on the hood of that car. Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2014 #7
That part, we don't know. arcane1 Nov 2014 #12
look here Travis_0004 Nov 2014 #22
Thanks for the video, the driver clearly meant to run over people. Rex Nov 2014 #25
Thanks for the extra video! It looks to me like they were trying to PUSH through. arcane1 Nov 2014 #30
I am guessing they are trying to go right on the next street and like you said push their way Rex Nov 2014 #48
Yeah, they may have thought they could intimidate people out of the way, and it failed utterly. arcane1 Nov 2014 #56
I bet they were poo pooing the pants after coming to a stop. Rex Nov 2014 #57
That's why I'm glad those damn windows held up! arcane1 Nov 2014 #60
I see the car stop and three people jump on the hood Recursion Nov 2014 #33
It didn't stop. THe video stutters a bit at first, but fullscreen the car keeps moving. arcane1 Nov 2014 #39
Let me try it fullscreen (nt) Recursion Nov 2014 #42
Again, I appreciate your healthy, rational skepticism, and I wish DU had more of it!!!! arcane1 Nov 2014 #50
Venus Recursion Nov 2014 #55
Especially when it's at low altitude, the effect is awe-inspiring. arcane1 Nov 2014 #59
Yes, you're right. Fullscreen makes a big difference Recursion Nov 2014 #52
you are seeing what you want to see. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #66
Trespassing, obviously. Rex Nov 2014 #14
No, but jumping on their hood means a driver gets afraid. Could he even see her? Recursion Nov 2014 #17
I don't know, but you cannot run over people it is against the law. Rex Nov 2014 #19
If you can't see the person lying in front of your car (because people are on your hood) Recursion Nov 2014 #23
Check out the video in post #22, it clearly shows the driver meant to run over people. Rex Nov 2014 #26
OMG did you watch it? He stops and three people jump on his hood. Recursion Nov 2014 #31
You mean you would purposely not follow the flow of traffic and get right next to people Rex Nov 2014 #36
No, I wouldn't get that close to a protest in a car Recursion Nov 2014 #38
Same here, okay maybe they wanted to turn right and the crowd was blocking them. Rex Nov 2014 #47
I really do think my judgment here is compromised because of my commute Recursion Nov 2014 #49
Sorry, I forget you are in India. Rex Nov 2014 #54
I commute as a pedestrian and I surely have a bias there too :) arcane1 Nov 2014 #61
Several years ago, Brigid Nov 2014 #62
Thank you for bringing the calm rationality that I usually like to bring, but failed to this time arcane1 Nov 2014 #20
Thank you. 840high Nov 2014 #24
I definitely want to see how they got there before I make up my mind (nt) Recursion Nov 2014 #15
New video, different timing and angle, in post 22 arcane1 Nov 2014 #32
And in it I see three people jump on the hood after the car stops Recursion Nov 2014 #34
So why not put the car in reverse and get away then? There was nobody behind them. Rex Nov 2014 #41
OK, having watched it in fullscreen that looks a lot worse for the driver Recursion Nov 2014 #44
What is telling is that they purposely move out of traffic and behind a group of people. Rex Nov 2014 #45
I tend to agree. Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2014 #53
Yeah. That situation calls for a three-point turn and a call to the boss Recursion Nov 2014 #58
Yep, the stopped car respected the difference between human flesh and car metal arcane1 Nov 2014 #64
Subaru...share the love....... Demonaut Nov 2014 #10
Yay! I just noticed the people on the left side, who PREVENT people from attacking the car. arcane1 Nov 2014 #63
I could see it if there was a woman birthing a baby in the backseat... a son driving his ScreamingMeemie Nov 2014 #65

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
3. Arrested is a legally defined state of custody.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:16 PM
Nov 2014

"Detained for interview" is a state where fewer restrictions on police behavior happen.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
4. If you arrest them, you have to tell them about that right to remain silent.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:19 PM
Nov 2014

And wait for their attorney.

If you're just "chatting" with them, you don't.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
5. If there were injuries, I am sure there
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:20 PM
Nov 2014

would be charges. The protesters were also breaking the law by impeading traffic so the case would have been somewhat murky.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
8. so it's ok to ram them and drive off with people on the hood and
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:22 PM
Nov 2014

one under the left front wheel? In what goddamn country do I live in now?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
11. Lots of gloating going on over the verdict, as you can see.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:25 PM
Nov 2014

You didn't know? If there is a crowd blocking the street...you can run over as many people as you like. I swear, some people here are so fucking transparent that it pains me to watch them in action.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
18. I'm glad I know that now! Always a pain in the ass waiting for pedestrians.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:28 PM
Nov 2014

So now I can just gun it!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
37. When I was stationed in W. Germany in the early 70's,
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:38 PM
Nov 2014

that certainly was the case, those German drivers back then were like Funny Cars at the Christmas Tree, inching up to the line hoping to beat the other car off the line, I pitied the fool still crossing the street when the light changed.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
27. Why do you assume the driver knew the person was in front of his tire?
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:34 PM
Nov 2014

Seriously. You aren't even a little bit skeptical about the fact that the video jumps in when the car is already surrounded, people are on the hood, and the woman is lying just in front of the tire?

In terms of the right of way, that again requires seeing the person, which you can't do if a crowd has jumped onto your hood.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
40. Well *I* can't see them in the post 22 video, except those jumping on the hood
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:39 PM
Nov 2014

So I can't say whether the driver saw the woman he hit.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
43. Why did the driver move over the the right behind a crowd of people
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:41 PM
Nov 2014

and not keep with the flow of traffic. Looks like they wanted to run over people.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
46. I assume because he's an entitled asshole who was in a hurry
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:43 PM
Nov 2014

Keep in mind I've been driving in Mumbai for a year and a half now (I even caught myself thinking "he's driving on the wrong side of the road!&quot where... umm... "etiquette" on the road is different.

That said, as I posted below, having watched the aerial video in fullscreen I agree the driver seems to be in the wrong here.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
51. Entitled asshole, I think that about sums it up.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:47 PM
Nov 2014

Foolish too, that crowd could have dragged them from the car and beaten them to death.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
28. Where did I write ANYTHING that would result in a reoly such as yours?
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:35 PM
Nov 2014

The driver might still be charged, we don't know what the county attorney may decide. I am juat glad there were no significant injuries with this incident.

Subaru Outback? The driver probably votes for Democrats.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
9. Really? I doubt that, you cannot run over someone with a car it is illegal.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:23 PM
Nov 2014

Props to you for defending the driver.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
12. That part, we don't know.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:25 PM
Nov 2014

I would've preferred to see the 5 or so seconds before the video started myself!

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
22. look here
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:32 PM
Nov 2014
http://m.


It looks like the car is trying to slowly go through, and people surround them and they gun it.
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
30. Thanks for the extra video! It looks to me like they were trying to PUSH through.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:36 PM
Nov 2014

The front of the car touches people before people touch the car. See the video during the 5th to 8th second.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
48. I am guessing they are trying to go right on the next street and like you said push their way
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:46 PM
Nov 2014

totally foolish thing to do imo.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
56. Yeah, they may have thought they could intimidate people out of the way, and it failed utterly.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:51 PM
Nov 2014

I'm glad the injuries were not serious. I'm also glad none of the car windows were broken.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
57. I bet they were poo pooing the pants after coming to a stop.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:53 PM
Nov 2014

Another reason it is foolish to plow into an angry mob...they can pull you out of the car and beat you to death. The driver is lucky to be alive imo.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
60. That's why I'm glad those damn windows held up!
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:13 AM
Nov 2014

At the time nobody knew it would be just minor injuries (since it was still happening!), they just saw what looked like a homicidal driver who needed to be stopped.

I'm glad the situation ended where it did, but I would be disappointed if the driver were legally deemed blameless

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
33. I see the car stop and three people jump on the hood
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:37 PM
Nov 2014

Then the driver tries to get the hell out of there.

Is that not what you see? It's pretty clear to me.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
50. Again, I appreciate your healthy, rational skepticism, and I wish DU had more of it!!!!
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:47 PM
Nov 2014


I like to think I'm not someone who would mistake Venus for a UFO, until I do

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
55. Venus
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:50 PM
Nov 2014

I remember the first time I ever noticed Venus. I was stationed in the Mojave and pulled second firewatch (because, you know, metal Quonset huts in the high desert catch on fire like all the time). We were right on the west side of a mountain. The sky was a dark pink, and the brightest "star" I have ever seen in my life pops over the mountain.

I had taken two astronomy classes in college, so I suppose I "knew" about Venus already, but it literally took my breath away. I can totally get why ancients thought it was a goddess, and modern people think it's a UFO...

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
59. Especially when it's at low altitude, the effect is awe-inspiring.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:58 PM
Nov 2014

The reason I mentioned it in the first place was because I had known about it for years, and spent many years thinking only a complete idiot would mistake Venus for anything except a bright star. Then one night during the winter I was driving through some hilly woods in Virginia, and saw low on the horizon this ball of light that bounced around the top of a distant hill. I SWORE it moved around!!

I eventually stooped the car and observed it, and realized I was that dumb-ass. Its low altitude made it seem larger and closer, and I was getting a strobe light effect from the leafless trees when I was driving. So it was a beautiful experience all around, that has stuck with me for over 25 years now

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
14. Trespassing, obviously.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:27 PM
Nov 2014

Standing in the street means a driver can run them over no problem - read it right here on the DU!

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
17. No, but jumping on their hood means a driver gets afraid. Could he even see her?
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:28 PM
Nov 2014

And then does something he might not do with a cooler head, like try to get the hell out of there.

Did "the driver run over" the woman or did "the woman put herself in front of his wheel"? Could he see her with all those people on his hood?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
19. I don't know, but you cannot run over people it is against the law.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:30 PM
Nov 2014

But please do make a case for it, this should be funny. Um...maybe the person driving should have stopped?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
23. If you can't see the person lying in front of your car (because people are on your hood)
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:32 PM
Nov 2014

how is it a crime?

maybe the person driving should have stopped?

You'd want to stop if a crowd of people are surrounding your car and pounding it?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
31. OMG did you watch it? He stops and three people jump on his hood.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:36 PM
Nov 2014

I'd get the hell out of there too.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
36. You mean you would purposely not follow the flow of traffic and get right next to people
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:38 PM
Nov 2014

to run them over? Good to know. Why didn't the driver put the car in reverse, they had nobody behind them. Nice try.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
47. Same here, okay maybe they wanted to turn right and the crowd was blocking them.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:44 PM
Nov 2014

But I would not try and run over people just to turn right. Then again that is just me and I would never try and get my car in between a group of angry people.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
49. I really do think my judgment here is compromised because of my commute
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:47 PM
Nov 2014

I get that close to crowds that dense at pretty much every intersection. I'm kind of worried about when I come back to the States...

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
54. Sorry, I forget you are in India.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:49 PM
Nov 2014

I remember my jaw dropping as I watched South Korean pedestrians showing no fear of oncoming traffic. They also ignored our tanks when we rolled down the street as if we were ghosts.

Brigid

(17,621 posts)
62. Several years ago,
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:16 AM
Nov 2014

Some of the drivers from "Ice Road Truckers" went to India to try their hand at driving in the Himalayas. They were hilarious! They were used to thinking safety, safety, safety, and it's total chaos. One driver didn't even make it out of New Delhi on his first run before he gave up and went home. Another, the only woman, had her truck mobbed and the two other drivers had to rescue her. One of them was constantly saying stuff like "Did you see that? That woman walked right in front of me!" Or "That guy almost sideswiped me!" And he absolutely hated those little green buses on those narrow mountain roads. Speaking of those roads, I don't know how they built them in the first place. It made for some great TV!

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
20. Thank you for bringing the calm rationality that I usually like to bring, but failed to this time
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:31 PM
Nov 2014


 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
41. So why not put the car in reverse and get away then? There was nobody behind them.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:40 PM
Nov 2014

Also, why purposely move behind a crowd of people and not follow the rest of the cars detouring around the crowd? Hmmm?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
44. OK, having watched it in fullscreen that looks a lot worse for the driver
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:41 PM
Nov 2014

He does seem to be in motion the whole time.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
45. What is telling is that they purposely move out of traffic and behind a group of people.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:43 PM
Nov 2014

IMO.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
58. Yeah. That situation calls for a three-point turn and a call to the boss
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 11:53 PM
Nov 2014

Probably followed by an "aww, fuck work today" and a nice pint at the pub.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
64. Yep, the stopped car respected the difference between human flesh and car metal
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:53 AM
Nov 2014

Whatever we don't know about the driver, we know this: they appear to be an asshole.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
63. Yay! I just noticed the people on the left side, who PREVENT people from attacking the car.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:20 AM
Nov 2014

The person in the grey-ish jacket said, basically, don't meet violence with violence.

I love it

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
65. I could see it if there was a woman birthing a baby in the backseat... a son driving his
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 01:09 AM
Nov 2014

mother with stroke-like symptoms... A child with a gash above her eye.

Lots of things. I am hoping that person had a danged good reason. I admit I can't watch the video because it appears horrific even in the still.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How the hell do you RUN O...