Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 10:43 AM Nov 2014

If Michael Brown was running away from Officer Wilson, why did he stop?

If being initially shot at and in the hand at the Police truck was enough to make Michael Brown and his friend run away, why on earth would the teen(s) stop running?

On GMA, Officer "Wilson says he only fired at Brown when Brown was facing him, and never when his back was turned."

There is no explanation in Wilson's testimony about why Michael Brown stopped running, just that he did (page 227).

Witnesses have stated that Brown was shot at and hit again as he ran away, and then stopped and presented himself to a pursuing Officer Wilson.

How the Prosecutor dismisses (or ignored) this eyewitness testimony is beyond me.


23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Michael Brown was running away from Officer Wilson, why did he stop? (Original Post) KeepItReal Nov 2014 OP
The testimony that contradicted Wilson's recounting of events justiceischeap Nov 2014 #1
The GJ apparentlly discounted this testimoney because Elmergantry Nov 2014 #2
"Shot at" while running away. Doesn't mean Brown was hit. Avalux Nov 2014 #4
You see, that is where the Wilson testimony, evidence, and eyewitnesses diverge KeepItReal Nov 2014 #5
Exactly. Avalux Nov 2014 #7
Did the testimony of the witness Elmergantry Nov 2014 #10
Or, perhaps, a wounded Brown stumbled forward in agony, while Wilson kept shooting. Avalux Nov 2014 #11
Did you read what I said? Elmergantry Nov 2014 #12
Why are you calling him "Big Mike"? So disrespectful. nt Avalux Nov 2014 #14
That was Dorian Johnsons name for him in the testimony. Elmergantry Nov 2014 #16
Yes you're right. Avalux Nov 2014 #20
No problem. Elmergantry Nov 2014 #21
Analyze this... Kalidurga Nov 2014 #22
I read everyone that knew him called him Big Mike helpmetohelpyou Nov 2014 #19
Johnson said Wilson shot at them as they ran away. Avalux Nov 2014 #3
How does Prosecutor McCollough dismiss all the other eyewitnesses, then? KeepItReal Nov 2014 #6
Great question. Avalux Nov 2014 #9
Unfortunately, Michael Brown can't tell us pinboy3niner Nov 2014 #8
Missouri state law allows him to fire on a fleeing suspect in this case XemaSab Nov 2014 #13
Then why did Officer Wilson omit that from his testimony? KeepItReal Nov 2014 #15
Maybe becasue he didnt. Elmergantry Nov 2014 #17
He was told to helpmetohelpyou Nov 2014 #18
Michael Baden's independent autopsy indicated the possibility of one shot to the back of the body aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #23

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
1. The testimony that contradicted Wilson's recounting of events
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 10:54 AM
Nov 2014

was discounted by the Prosecutor because it didn't match with the "evidence."

I've been asking this question since the autopsy was released and still haven't found an answer for it: the bullet that entered the woman's apartment during the entire thing, what was the trajectory of that? Was that bullet meant to hit Brown in the back and missed or was it shot from somewhere else?

Dorian Johnson states that Wilson was firing while they ran away... others claim the same but again, the Prosecutor seemed to discount that testimony.

 

Elmergantry

(884 posts)
2. The GJ apparentlly discounted this testimoney because
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 10:54 AM
Nov 2014

If he was shot running away from the cop, the bullet entry would be in the back. All three autopsies determined all the bullets entered in the front and top of the head.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
4. "Shot at" while running away. Doesn't mean Brown was hit.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 10:58 AM
Nov 2014

He had already been shot, was in pain, there was more shooting....what would you do? Keep running and maybe be killed, or turn and plead for your life?

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
5. You see, that is where the Wilson testimony, evidence, and eyewitnesses diverge
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 11:04 AM
Nov 2014

There has to be an actual trial with examination and cross-examination to bear all these things out.

Prosecutor McCollugh is a joke.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
7. Exactly.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 11:08 AM
Nov 2014

Also - a trial would allow Wilson to be cross-examined; a prosecutor (a good one), would rip his story to shreds. He was allowed to tell the grand jury whatever he wanted, without being challenged.

 

Elmergantry

(884 posts)
10. Did the testimony of the witness
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 11:12 AM
Nov 2014

claim he was just "shot at" or that the shots taken actually landed in the the back? I dont know, I would be happy to read that transcript. In fact I will dig that up after the post.

As for turning to plead for your life, the physical scene showed a blood splatter from Browns body approx 25 feet BEHIND where Brown fell dead. That seems to me to mean after getting hit once(or more) from the first salvo he moved toward the officer. A "Bull Rush"? Perhaps. Or was it someone stumbling forward towards the officer (to surreneder perhaps) after taking the inital frontal shots and ulitmately headed for the ground while taking the last fatal shot to the top of the head? Perhaps.

We have testimony from other witnesses stating it was a "Bull Rush". So I guess the GJ needed to put that on the scale and make the call.





Avalux

(35,015 posts)
11. Or, perhaps, a wounded Brown stumbled forward in agony, while Wilson kept shooting.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 11:15 AM
Nov 2014

I don't believe for a minute he suddenly became a homicidal/suidical maniac and rushed at Wilson. Come on.

Precisely why there needs to be a trial.

The worst part of this? Wilson and others are destroying Brown's character, and he can't defend himself.

 

Elmergantry

(884 posts)
12. Did you read what I said?
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:01 PM
Nov 2014

>>Or, perhaps, a wounded Brown stumbled forward in agony, while Wilson kept shooting.

I basically said the same thing:


Or was it someone stumbling forward towards the officer (to surreneder perhaps) after taking the inital frontal shots and ulitmately headed for the ground while taking the last fatal shot to the top of the head? Perhaps.

We have to look at the testimony. I just read the testimony of Johnson about this part. Johnson said shots were fired at his back and
sensed that he was hit but didnt know for sure. Well the autopsy said he was not. Ok thats settled. Johnson then said that Big Mike turned around and was then hit in the front while standing and more when he was going down. He said Big Mike did not start back towards the officer, he fell where he was fatally shot. However the forensics show a blood stain 25 feet behindwhere he fell. Did that blood stain fly 25 feet from where he was shot? Seems unlikely but Im no expert. If you look at where the shell casings landing relative to Brown, they are very close to Brown. I do know that casings can fly, but that considered, the close proximity of the casings to Brown indicates to me that Brown was very close to Wilson indicationg that Brown may have closed the distance between the two if he had doublebed back to the officer.



 

Elmergantry

(884 posts)
16. That was Dorian Johnsons name for him in the testimony.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:26 PM
Nov 2014

He refers to him as "Big Mike" I was just using that as it was fresh in my mind casue I just read the testimony.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
20. Yes you're right.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:34 PM
Nov 2014

I'm really sensitive to Brown's character being shredded when he can't defend himself. I understand and apologize for saying you were being disrespectful.

 

Elmergantry

(884 posts)
21. No problem.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:51 PM
Nov 2014

I havent said much here about this whole affair prior to the GJ because I wanted to come to my own conclusion after all the evidence is released. Its my nature. I am in a highly analytical field of work where emotion and preconceptions mean nothing; thats how I operate. So finally after reading portions of the testimony and the evidence, I can see why the GJ came to its conclusion. I know that makes me unpopular, but what the heck, is this just an echo chamber or a place to discuss?


I wonder if there was another way the officer could have subdued Brown. He had an asp. Could not he had clubbed the guy? I think this is a case where a relatively young officer with not a ton of experience was over his head. But its easy to be the Monday Morning Cop from an armchair.

I would like to know more about that guy who go shot at Walmart for holding a BB gun, or that kid who got killed in Cleveland for having a toy gun. If you ask me, those to incidents point to police incompetence at best or racism at worst. Are we going to get justice for those incidents?

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
3. Johnson said Wilson shot at them as they ran away.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 10:56 AM
Nov 2014

He said Brown, who had already been shot by the car, turned around to get Wilson to stop shooting. I guess since Johnson was Brown's friend and with him during the incident, his testimony meant nothing.

In Wilson's terrified and twisted mind, it wasn't possible that Brown was afraid for his life and turned around to get Wilson to stop shooting. Wilson saw him as a monster he had to kill, a superhuman freak who was unfazed by the bullets, the bullets couldn't stop him.

I hope the remainder of Wilson's life is a living hell.

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
6. How does Prosecutor McCollough dismiss all the other eyewitnesses, then?
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 11:07 AM
Nov 2014

This was a sham investigation (or lack thereof) from beginning to end.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
9. Great question.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 11:10 AM
Nov 2014

He did, and he got away with it. Technically, he, the prosecutor, failed to bring his case to trial against a killer cop. Yet that's exactly what he wanted. So messed up.

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
15. Then why did Officer Wilson omit that from his testimony?
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:10 PM
Nov 2014

Eyewitnesses stated the Officer shot as Brown was running away.

 

Elmergantry

(884 posts)
17. Maybe becasue he didnt.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:28 PM
Nov 2014

Thats the rub. If he was shooting while he was running away, Wilson has a problem. I would like to see where the casings landed from those shots.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
23. Michael Baden's independent autopsy indicated the possibility of one shot to the back of the body
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 08:56 PM
Nov 2014

while Brown was running away. Baden couldn't be conclusive about it. Baden of course wasn't allowed into the grand jury proceeding to testify.

http://www.newsweek.com/what-we-learned-michael-browns-autopsy-265247

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Michael Brown was runn...