Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it true there were no autopsy photos taken of Micheal? (Original Post) uppityperson Nov 2014 OP
Scene photos justiceischeap Nov 2014 #1
Thank you. I find it incredible that they would not take photos in a police shooting of any sort, uppityperson Nov 2014 #2
Apparently they eventually did take scene photos but they did not measure distances justiceischeap Nov 2014 #3

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
1. Scene photos
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 12:39 PM
Nov 2014

not actual autopsy. However, I think they were later taken when the St. Louis County police got there. It's one of the reasons Browns' body lay there so long.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
2. Thank you. I find it incredible that they would not take photos in a police shooting of any sort,
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 01:55 PM
Nov 2014

cya thing.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
3. Apparently they eventually did take scene photos but they did not measure distances
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 02:41 PM
Nov 2014

If you even skim some of the grand jury testimony you see right away that the police investigated this with about as much fervor as a prisoner walking to death row.

A lot of the issues and inconsistencies stem from their lack of investigation and it makes me wonder if they ran a shoddy investigation on purpose.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it true there were no ...