General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats Are Petrified of Defending Government—but They Need to Start
by Michael Tomasky
If you number yourself among my longer-suffering readers, you may know that one of the occasional hobbyhorses I ride for 800 words is my immense frustration that Democrats are terrified of defending government. Oh, some of them do sometimes. But mostly they defend ends, not means. That is: They defend this or that program or policy goal, but they dont defend the vehicle that provides it, the federal government.
Now you are already sitting at your whetstone, sharpening your knife, ready to instruct me in all the reasons it would be preposterous for the Democrats to do this. I know the reasons already. But theyre wrong. Because look, folks: The Democrats are the party of government. Its the basic reason a person is a Democrat in the first placeDemocrats disagree about loads of things, but the one principle they all subscribe to is a belief that the federal government can and must intervene in the economic and social spheres to even things out. And the rejection of that belief is the basic reason a person is a Republican.
So government is the fundamental dividing line. And yet, for the past 30 years, what kind of debate about this have we had? Weve had one side relentlessly attacking government as incompetent to evil, and the other side saying nothing, being too cowed to stand up and say that government is, and does, good. Elected officials dont do it, and even the progressive political professionals dont do it.
Think of this: Of all the dozens of groups out there that make up what we call the liberal infrastructure, the think thanks and interest-group nonprofits and so on, there is not a single entity whose goal is the defense of government. Given this, its perfectly reasonable that such large majorities think the government is awful, because you have the government haters telling them for three decades how awful government is and the government defenders saying nothing.
more
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/12/04/democrats-are-petrified-of-defending-government-but-they-need-to-start.html
marble falls
(57,114 posts)kentuck
(111,104 posts)Whatever the Repubs are for, Democrats should be against. That would make it a lot easier, wouldn't it?
And "government" needs taxes to run the programs for the people. And Democrats that continue to support taxcuts are not Democrats at all, including many here on DU.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)I'm having trouble these days accepting the argument that "Dems are too chicken" to do their jobs. I don't believe that anymore. I don't believe they're "dumb" either.
The question for me is: Are Dems Chicken or Cooperating by remaining silent? The Dems Party I dedicated myself to in the late 1950's would have Never remained silent nor "made deals" under the Ruse of Bipartisanship/Comity/Cooperation. They would have Called Bullshit loudly, Often and left NO Doubt who they stood With. And That, my friends was the Working Class and Poor. Most of you are too young to remember This Democratic Party.
If you know and Like the Elizabeth Warrren Wing? Or agree with Sen Sanders? Then you also must understand they reflect the mission, policies and values of the Dem Wing of the Old Pre Corporatized Class of greedy, wealthy self-serving assholes we elected. Using Were Not Them/Were Not With POTUS is the biggest load of compost Ive seen yet.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)May I suggest Somalia. It is a libertarian's paradise. It even has open carry and unlimited guns.
librechik
(30,674 posts)Elizabeth Warren, too.
oh, BTW--liberal infrastructure? Is the author demented? Where and what is that???
WillyT
(72,631 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)i.e., Gingrichcare, austerity lowering deficits, and bubbles pushing up the stock market