Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 04:52 PM Dec 2014

Hillary Clinton weighs in on Eric Garner chokehold death, Ferguson:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton says the criminal justice system is "out of balance," and she supports federal reviews of police-involved deaths of black men in Ferguson, Missouri, and New York City.

Clinton is speaking at a women's conference in Boston. She says the cases show the need for federal law enforcement money to be used for best practices, not weapons of war.

She says the U.S. has let its criminal justice system get out of balance, and she notes disparity in the number of black men in prison.

Civil rights leaders have criticized grand jury decisions not to charge a white police officer in the chokehold death of Eric Garner in New York and not to charge a white officer who shot and killed an unarmed black teen in Missouri.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/04/hillary-clinton-eric-garner_n_6271302.html

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton weighs in on Eric Garner chokehold death, Ferguson: (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Dec 2014 OP
kick Cali_Democrat Dec 2014 #1
I'm having a real hard time getting excited for Hillary Don Draper Dec 2014 #44
Not giving me the "Warm Fuzzy" either FreakinDJ Dec 2014 #49
Wow. Talk about hard hitting nichomachus Dec 2014 #2
wow. Talk about a predictable response wyldwolf Dec 2014 #4
Well it was a predictable statement -- carefully crafted and mealy mouthed nt nichomachus Dec 2014 #14
I found it to be calm and even tempered. wyldwolf Dec 2014 #19
I just *LOVE* Hillary Clinton, but unfortunately, Heather Kube Dec 2014 #39
Well it would be unseemly if she said something like this... Kalidurga Dec 2014 #53
Quite the insightful, well-thought and sourced analysis you've offered us... LanternWaste Dec 2014 #8
Well, for starters nichomachus Dec 2014 #13
Bingo! Scuba Dec 2014 #24
+1 daleanime Dec 2014 #35
Yup, you nailed it. Typical Third Way do nothin response. InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2014 #36
Exactly! Heather Kube Dec 2014 #41
+1 zeemike Dec 2014 #48
so true helpmetohelpyou Dec 2014 #26
This poor woman cannot win! yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #30
+1000 DeSwiss Dec 2014 #33
I agree with the idea of starting Union Scribe Dec 2014 #3
illuminate the course we must follow Heather Kube Dec 2014 #43
Lame. closeupready Dec 2014 #5
I thought this would be a joke PAProgressive28 Dec 2014 #6
A bit late to the game, but glad she at least said something... Blue_Tires Dec 2014 #7
Late in the game???? 24 hours???? yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #32
Exactly. And what did Bernie and Elizabeth say about Ferguson? SunSeeker Dec 2014 #42
There's no denying she *IS* late on Ferguson... Blue_Tires Dec 2014 #46
"out of balance"?! MindPilot Dec 2014 #9
LOL! Baitball Blogger Dec 2014 #16
Pffft! Enthusiast Dec 2014 #45
Good, this was or is a first step sadoldgirl Dec 2014 #10
And not a single corporate media toadie will demand more than that conveniently milquetoast reply. woo me with science Dec 2014 #11
Classic Clinton immediacy and decisiveness. RufusTFirefly Dec 2014 #12
Pony Express was faster n/t nichomachus Dec 2014 #15
Yeah, and there was an actual pony! MindPilot Dec 2014 #17
BTW, point us to Warren's response on Garner, will you? And Bernie's? brooklynite Dec 2014 #18
Sorry, but I think that you are too much hooked sadoldgirl Dec 2014 #21
Only responding to the theme already posted... brooklynite Dec 2014 #29
Okay, I understand, sadoldgirl Dec 2014 #31
Please use the correct term - triangulation Doctor_J Dec 2014 #38
Thanks. Sounds too technical. Guess I'll leave it to the experts RufusTFirefly Dec 2014 #47
I always enjoy her timely faxes. nt Dreamer Tatum Dec 2014 #20
Leading from behind Fearless Dec 2014 #22
Better late than never etherealtruth Dec 2014 #23
Glad she responded. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #25
Seems reasonable and responsible to me... NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #27
It comes with the territory. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #28
Thank you for your remark. Hillary Clinton has asjr Dec 2014 #50
This is a reasonable statement n/t malaise Dec 2014 #34
*Too* reasonable IMO. But realistically, I wouldn't have expected anything stronger. n/t nomorenomore08 Dec 2014 #37
If there's such a thing as ''Damning with faint praise.....'' DeSwiss Dec 2014 #40
Well the best practices seems to be zeemike Dec 2014 #51
thank you ma'am spanone Dec 2014 #52

Don Draper

(187 posts)
44. I'm having a real hard time getting excited for Hillary
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:35 PM
Dec 2014

What a vanilla response. I want to hear what Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have to say.

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
49. Not giving me the "Warm Fuzzy" either
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:48 PM
Dec 2014

Another Federal Layer of Cover Up is EXACTLY what we don't need

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
2. Wow. Talk about hard hitting
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 05:23 PM
Dec 2014

I wonder how many focus groups her handlers had to run that by before they came up with this.

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
4. wow. Talk about a predictable response
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 05:30 PM
Dec 2014

I wonder how long you had to hang out at DU with the Pony-envy crowd to come up with THAT reply.

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
19. I found it to be calm and even tempered.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:22 PM
Dec 2014

Of course, what you want is someone who yells, pounds the podium and points their finger when talking. It makes a better DU sig line pic.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
53. Well it would be unseemly if she said something like this...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 10:06 PM
Dec 2014

the whole damn system is rotten to its core
we need reform from shore to shore

brave souls crossed the sea to escape tyranny
but brought with them their bigotry

They created laws for the common w̶h̶i̶t̶e̶ man
making rank elites was the plan

They doled out freedom, the masses to allay
and proudly stand on feet of clay

They built in a Constitution of redress
it serves the needs of the noblesse

by custom, design, and with the law in place
they keep cover over their base

vile behavior to the victims is assigned
that keeps the eyes of justice blind

wars of aggression are launched with impunity
their station gives them immunity

They rob resources from the poor to feed the rich
wealth comes from hard work is the pitch

with silver spoons they feast on lies fed to them
those in their service they must condemn.

and for those that haven’t enough utility
they save the most hostility

their biggest fear is a level playing field
knowing that their power would yield

their hold on resources is with guns, germs, and steal
robbing from labor with much zeal

from a high horse they breath a rarefied air
it is but the stench of despair

And if the masses rise against oppression
they will stomp on any progression

with whips, hoses, and extrajudicial action
freedom has never gained traction

we all must be aware of the thin blue line
it hides the murderous incline

even when unarmed children lay dead in a street
we find justice wears a white sheet

just in case you haven't kept score
the whole damn system is rotten to its core

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
8. Quite the insightful, well-thought and sourced analysis you've offered us...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 05:38 PM
Dec 2014

Quite the insightful, well-thought and sourced analysis you've offered us... as it most certainly isn't merely a half-witted bumper-sticker in lieu of any valid point.

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
13. Well, for starters
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 05:59 PM
Dec 2014

Instead of being outraged that young black men are being murdered with impunity, she turned it into a budgetary issue and called for more meeting and analyses that will do nothing to solve the problem.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
30. This poor woman cannot win!
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:11 PM
Dec 2014

She as a private citizen gave a response before Elizabeth Warren who has not said a word.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
32. Late in the game???? 24 hours????
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:16 PM
Dec 2014

Where's Nancy's response? Reid? Cuomo? Gilldabrand? Warren? It is so unfair the poor treatment she receives. I wonder how she stays above it? We are privileged to have her as President in 2016 and we don't even appreciate the gift handed to us. Wow!!!

SunSeeker

(51,574 posts)
42. Exactly. And what did Bernie and Elizabeth say about Ferguson?
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:31 PM
Dec 2014

I can't recall them saying anything very different than what Hillary just said.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
46. There's no denying she *IS* late on Ferguson...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:40 PM
Dec 2014

and I thought she'd be ahead of the curve on New York since she it's her state and she is the one running for president out of that bunch you named...

And it has to be said that even though his comments were cynical, tone-deaf, and useless, even Rand fuckin' Paul beat her to the news cycle by 12 hours...

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
10. Good, this was or is a first step
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 05:40 PM
Dec 2014

Now let us hear from others. While I don't believe that the
DoJ can do much, I still hope that Cuomo will call for another
GJ with a special prosecutor. If that does not happen...
all else is whitewash.

BTW I did not hear anything from big Harry, nor Pelosi.
Yet Boehner did talk about a hearing.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
11. And not a single corporate media toadie will demand more than that conveniently milquetoast reply.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 05:43 PM
Dec 2014

Not a single media toadie will ask her to take a stand on ending these obscene programs to ramp up militarization of police, exploded under a corporate Democratic administration:

Specialty of the Third Way: Vague platitudes while protecting the militarization itself

Militarization of our police departments is a *bipartisan* effort of corporatists in both parties, right along with mass surveillance, the assaults on journalism, and the persecution of whistleblowers. The programs and legislation that are turning our police departments into paramilitary forces come through Homeland Security and the Pentagon, and are being used to suppress and intimidate dissent, exploit communities, and fill lucrative private prisons with slave labor as the nation is corporatized and Americans are made into a nation of low-paid wage slaves.

Both parties are complicit in this outrage. See the links below. Real change requires pushback against corporate politicians who are enabling this militarization, and that includes both corporate Democrats and Republicans.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

The entire Democratic leadership opposed Grayson amendment to stop arming cops with DOD weapons
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025390424


The Obama Administration's Escalation of Police Militarization
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/06/aclu-police-militarization-swat_n_2813334.html

It's almost certain that if the police agencies cooperate, the ACLU will find that the militarization trend has accelerated since Kraska's studies more than a decade ago. All of the policies, incentives and funding mechanisms that were driving the trend then are still in effect now. And most of them have grown in size and scope.

The George W. Bush administration actually began scaling down the Byrne and COPS programs in the early 2000s, part of a general strategy of leaving law enforcement to states and localities. But the Obama administration has since resurrected both programs. The Byrne program got a $2 billion surge in funding as part of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, by far the largest budget in the program's 25-year history. Obama also gave the COPS program $1.55 billion that same year, a 250 percent increase over its 2008 budget, and again the largest budget in the program's history. Vice President Joe Biden had championed both programs during his time in the Senate.

The Pentagon's 1033 program has also exploded under Obama. In the program's monthly newsletter (Motto: "From Warfighter to Crimefighter&quot , its director announced in October 2011 that his office had given away a record $500 million in military gear in fiscal year 2011, which he noted, "passes the previous mark by several hundred million dollars." He added, "I believe we can exceed that in FY 12.”

Then there are the Department of Homeland Security's anti-terrorism grants. The Center for Investigative Reporting found in a 2011 investigation that since 2001, DHS has given out more than $34 billion in grants to police departments across the country, many of which have been used to purchase military-grade guns, tanks, armor, and armored personnel carriers. The grants have gone to such unlikely terrorism targets as Fargo, N.D.; Canyon County, Idaho; and Tuscaloosa, Ala.


WOW... Went Looking For Connections Between Ferguson And ALEC... Found This Piece Of The Puzzle...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025413841

The exploitation of Ferguson I: In 2013 the town issued over 24,000 arrest warrants..
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025404667

The exploitation of Ferguson II: The Seamy Underbelly Of Ferguson Starts To Appear
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025416747

The exploitation of Ferguson III: Ferguson Feeds Off the Poor: Three Warrants a Year Per Household
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025428157



"Operation Urban Shield"...Training our Police, Fire, First Responders..in Military Tactics
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025412909

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
12. Classic Clinton immediacy and decisiveness.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 05:49 PM
Dec 2014

Following in the tradition of her first comments about Ferguson on August 28, a mere 19 days after the shooting occurred. In this age of Tweets, it's great to have a President-elect who's not embarrassed to respond at Pony Express pace.

She began by expressing empathy for the parents of Mike Brown, but in a bit of point-missing that would characterize her remarks, added that “losing a child is every parent’s greatest fear and an unimaginable loss.”

The point she missed, of course, is that losing a child in this manner, gunned down unarmed by police, is not every parent’s greatest fear, but to those for whom it is, the parents of young black men and boys, it is an extremely imaginable loss. It’s a loss that most black parents couldn’t un-imagine if they tried.

In addressing the aftermath of the shooting, Clinton was just vague enough that people could know what she was talking about, but she could avoid explicitly denouncing the police. She talked about the “dramatic, terrible pictures on television,” and noted that “Nobody wants to see our streets look like a war zone,” but didn’t explain why they looked like a war zone. As Clinton described it, the frayed “bonds of trust and respect” sounded like a two-way street, at best.


Hillary Clinton Kinda Feels Bad About What Happened In Ferguson Maybe

Good to have someone thoughtful, deliberate, and courageous like President-elect Clinton, unlike that harpy Elizabeth Warren, who rashly responded just five days after the incident. Has she no shame?!

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
21. Sorry, but I think that you are too much hooked
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:28 PM
Dec 2014

on 2016. Right now we should ask about Reid's, Pelosi's and McConnel's comments,
since Boehner already agreed to a hearing. This is happening NOW, and the Dem's leading
politicians in office are sparing with their response.
What about Shumer? has he made any sensible comments about a hearing in the
Senate?

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
38. Please use the correct term - triangulation
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:25 PM
Dec 2014

no one knows what it means, so it can't actually be criticized

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
27. Seems reasonable and responsible to me...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:48 PM
Dec 2014

No Clinton fan here but I fail to see what is wrong with what she said

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
28. It comes with the territory.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:50 PM
Dec 2014

People want more of our politicians at times so I understand that some want to hear more.

asjr

(10,479 posts)
50. Thank you for your remark. Hillary Clinton has
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:56 PM
Dec 2014

become a target for some of the people on DU. Seems there is nothing she can do to please them. I have been here since 2002 and more or less have stopped writing here. It is very disturbing to read some of their replies. I do wish Eisenhower was still with us. He was the first president I ever voted for and I can't remember him ever saying degrading things about other people. Of course I only saw and heard him on the radio or in the movie news.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
40. If there's such a thing as ''Damning with faint praise.....''
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:30 PM
Dec 2014

...then I suppose this would be called ''Milktoasting with faint criticism.''

So let me see if I have this right. Her overall take here is:

1) We need a larger federal role in local policing.
2) We need to put the criminal justice system ''back into balance'' (whatever the fuck that means).
3) We should spend federal law enforcement dollars on ''best practices'' (again whatever the fuck that means).

- The only thing that seems to be missing here is ''Oceania, Tis for Thee'' playing in the background......

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
51. Well the best practices seems to be
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:59 PM
Dec 2014

Shoot first and ask questions later...cause dead men tell no tales.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton weighs in...