General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat I've Learned from Two Years Collecting Data on Police Killings
http://gawker.com/what-ive-learned-from-two-years-collecting-data-on-poli-1625472836
What I've Learned from Two Years Collecting Data on Police Killings
382,354324
D. Brian Burghart
Filed to: POLICE BRUTALITY
COPS
DEATHS
PROJECTS
8/22/14 1:25pm
A few days ago, Deadspin's Kyle Wagner began to compile a list of all police-involved shootings in the U.S. He's not the only one to undertake such a project: D. Brian Burghart, editor of the Reno News & Review, has been attempting a crowdsourced national database of deadly police violence. We asked Brian to write about what he's learned from his project.
It began simply enough. Commuting home from my work at Reno's alt-weekly newspaper, the News & Review, on May 18, 2012, I drove past the aftermath of a police shootingin this case, that of a man named Jace Herndon. It was a chaotic scene, and I couldn't help but wonder how often it happened.
I went home and grabbed my laptop and a glass of wine and tried to find out. I found nothinga failure I simply chalked up to incompetent local media.
- snip -
I started to search in earnest. Nowhere could I find out how many people died during interactions with police in the United States. Try as I might, I just couldn't wrap my head around that idea. How was it that, in the 21st century, this data wasn't being tracked, compiled, and made available to the public? How could journalists know if police were killing too many people in their town if they didn't have a way to compare to other cities? Hell, how could citizens or police? How could cops possibly know "best practices" for dealing with any fluid situation? They couldn't.
- snip -
Database & Last Name Check
Read more fatalencounters.org
The biggest thing I've taken away from this project is something I'll never be able to prove, but I'm convinced to my core: The lack of such a database is intentional. No governmentnot the federal government, and not the thousands of municipalities that give their police forces license to use deadly forcewants you to know how many people it kills and why.
It's the only conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence. What evidence? In attempting to collect this information, I was lied to and delayed by the FBI, even when I was only trying to find out the addresses of police departments to make public records requests. The government collects millions of bits of data annually about law enforcement in its Uniform Crime Report, but it doesn't collect information about the most consequential act a law enforcer can do.
I've been lied to and delayed by state, county and local law enforcement agenciesalmost every time. They've blatantly broken public records laws, and then thumbed their authoritarian noses at the temerity of a citizen asking for information that might embarrass the agency. And these are the people in charge of enforcing the law.
The second biggest thing I learned is that bad journalism colludes with police to hide this information. The primary reason for this is that police will cut off information to reporters who tell tales. And a reporter can't work if he or she can't talk to sources. It happened to me on almost every level as I advanced this year-long Fatal Encounters series through the News & Review. First they talk; then they stop, then they roadblock.
MORE
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
malaise
(268,718 posts)Caribbean islands.
Excellent article - thanks Hissyspit
sammy750
(165 posts)Americans don't live in a Democracy. We live in a police and GOP control nation. It will get worst unless smart people wise up and make changes.
Callmecrazy
(3,065 posts)Don't kid yourself... There are plenty of liberal dirty cops out there as well.
Speed8098
(1,655 posts)What's your point?
Callmecrazy
(3,065 posts)that its a GOP controlled nation and police state. There's plenty of Liberal controlled police agencies that are thumping on civilians too. Saying it's the GOP's fault is painting with too broad a brush.
maindawg
(1,151 posts)ridiculous.
Just because you say it, don't make it so.
pasto76
(1,589 posts)'by definition' really.
your post says that every cop that has ever killed someone is conservative. Wow that would be quite a conspiracy.
So you dont know anything about socio and psychological factors contributing to killing someone. How adverse, as a species, we really are about killing one another. There are a TON of psychological pressures and influencing required to get people to actually shoot someone. Keep in mind Im a veteran of the iraq war, have a biology degree and have read constantly since 2004 about killing psychology. So I can speak firsthand about how powerful the 'protect your own' and/or 'protect the department/institution' pressures might be. To jump to a conclusion along the lines of your statement, if conservatives are so bad, how could a 'liberal' take a stand or speak out and not lose his job, not lose his career. If you cant acknowledge those pressures and fears exist, you're kidding yourself.
if this data were ever compiled there would be plenty of 'liberal' and non conservative police in there too.
eomer
(3,845 posts)Clearly the liberal position is against wanton killing of people by police. So if a police agency is really controlled by liberals, effectively controlled, then they won't be wantonly killing people.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)I think the poster was making the point that abusive policing doesn't just happen in cities or states where the GOP is in power. And that's certainly true.
Your point is interesting, though, too, and it goes to the issue of effective civilian control of police. Why is it that some places with liberal leadership have police running amok?
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)You could test all sorts of hypotheses with the information contained in a list like that.
You could look at city demographics, at budgets, at local media messaging, etc. You could measure the effects of police body cameras as they come in, city by city. You could look at the characteristics (e.g. training) of "good" versus "bad" police forces.
I have no time or resources to do that study, but it would be very interesting.
eomer
(3,845 posts)I'm not especially familiar with NYC issues but I assume we don't yet fully know what changes will occur due to the first Democrat to be NYC mayor in 20 years. Especially with so much controversy right now to give him leverage I hope that de Blasio will try to make some changes (and in the right direction). And then I guess we'll find out whether civilian control of the NYPD is or is not only the case when there's a conservative in office with whose policy choices police would likely agree.
In other places and situations we would need to discuss what we mean by "liberal". There are lots of politicians who aren't really liberals, they just play one on TV. Or they are liberal on some issues while being in the "law and order" camp on policies of policing. So we would need to distinguish between having a politician in control who is liberal on policing issues and one who is conservative on policing but liberal on some other things. Also would have to allow for politicians who are liars (most of them).
ncjustice80
(948 posts)Callmecrazy
(3,065 posts)Because you're a liberal? I'm a Democrat and I see it all the time.
I don't blindly follow the party line.
spell check much?
ncjustice80
(948 posts)You win the internet! Congratulations
Callmecrazy
(3,065 posts)since you couldn't answer my question.
ncjustice80
(948 posts)Enjoy your stay.
Response to Callmecrazy (Reply #25)
Munificence This message was self-deleted by its author.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Callmecrazy
(3,065 posts)I'm not into group think, so I'll stop here.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)We can't be dirty cops. We leave that to the right wing, gun nut, racist asshole types.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)No shit.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)That's the centerpiece line.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Thanks, Hissyspit.
marym625
(17,997 posts)That's exactly what every publication and reporter has been running into. It's ludicrous.
Here's an article I have cited a few times regarding this subject. They used the CDC, FBI, DOJ and still can't get the truth. The article cites other publications trying to get answers and running into the same frustration
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/08/police-shootings-ferguson-race-data
avebury
(10,951 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)Bookmarking for my reference. My problem is that TOO MANY PEOPLE just can't take enough time to even listen to me when I talk about this situation. My own family even tells me I'm too obsessed and need "other outlets" that won't disturb me!
It infuriates me to no end and I have so much bottled up inside me when it comes to trying to inform others. I have grandchildren and wonder what they will have to deal with in the future. There are days I can almost convince myself that in time they will "see the light" and fight back. But mostly I think I live in a world of See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil! To me what I see and hear on a daily basis DOES fill my head with all types of information I want to share, but as I said the conversations with others are very slim.
I could list the excuses they give me, they are long and I do understand that people work, go to school and their time is limited when it comes to digging deeper into problems. Still, I have a feeling that I need to tape my mouth shut because very few people will sit down and listen.
But, I WILL sit down and read this, feel very outraged and probably lose some sleep over it. I do want to thank you for spending so much time on your end and for posting this. I know we use so little of our brains so I'm sure I can log it into a place up there and perhaps have a chance to make others aware.
Ms. Toad
(34,000 posts)you can give those who don't think they have enough time to do anything a way to be useful.
The database is actively seeking crowdsource help (although the directions in the article are incomplete).
Go here (direct your friends here) to complete the data for one person who was killed by police - about a 25 minute effort.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)At times, modern day life breaks your heart. But it is important to keep trying.
I lose hope and then some innocuous post on a website rekindles my hope. When I read some years back that Malia asked the Prsident what he was doing about the massive BP oil leak into the ocean, that gave me hope. Go Malia!
And remember to give yourself a break occasionally from the mess that is the outer world. If you stay focused on the outer world, you don't see that 8 yr old kid doing somersaults in the first winter's snow. Or the middle aged volunteer coming into the elder home and reading Christmas stories to the clients there.
In any event,
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)to enjoy so many things, the small things for sure. So many days I wake up and wonder if I'm really ready or willing to face another 24 hrs. I feel like a drop of water in the ocean and it feels so defeating. Not good for sure.
Last night I watched what must have been Robins William's last movie, not sure though. It was called The Face Of Love, nothing Like I thought was going to be, but it was very thought provoking. Ed Harris, Annette Bening and Robin Williams, whose part wasn't that large, but I related to the movie because my life seemed to mirror so much of what it conveyed. Phrases said and actions taken were so thought provoking. Knowing Williams committed suicide I wondered if this movie was part of it all.
Perhaps not Academy Award worthy, but given my age and those in the movie are where I'm at. At one point in the movie Ed Harris' character said something about looking into a mirror and wondering about where had the time gone, what will never be again in life and memories of it all. Not exact words, but I know I've looked into the same mirror and had similar thoughts.
And one for you too
Dustlawyer
(10,494 posts)They could put teeth in the reporting law. The Chief could be required to designate someone to keep track and release the incidents as they occur and sanction the chief if they don't.
I used to work with a police organization (16,000 law enforcement officers strong) providing legal defense in cases where they shot someone, or were under a legal investigation as a result of the performance of their jobs. I learned a lot! I went on "ride-a-longs, went to their conventions, and their continuing education classes. What I learned was that for all intents and purposes they are all Republicans. The Democrats would secretly come to me and tell me that they could not be openly Democrat or they would be ostracized and worse. I was openly Democrat, but they tolerated me because of what I did for them. I never took a case I wasn't comfortable with since I was doing it pro bono.
When going on the ride-a-longs I became friends with a patrol Sargent who explained that they do have a problem with the people attracted to the job for the sheer power trip nature of the job. People who only feel better if they are inflicting pain and misery on others. They also have the steroid, body builder group who all were extremely short tempered. He flat out told me that if an officer were to cross the thin blue line they were risking their lives, not just their careers. When I told him how wrong that is he asked me how I would fix this. I had no answer that I thought would work. He genuinely wanted to know because he hated, as do many officers, covering for an ashore or worse. Not everyone is willing to be Serpico, especially when they have family's. He said that the best they could come up with is isolating the bad apple and making them worry about whether officers would be quick to back them up. While it was acceptable for them to do this, it would not be acceptable to fire them publicly or turn them in for violations of the law.
This is all from a man that had his neck broken by a drunk driver while approaching a stolen car on the highway, and who had to shoot a former H.S. friend who committed suicide by cop by forcing my friend to shoot him. He is haunted by this to this day.
I told him that he could fix a lot of this if he got the Sheriff and the rest of the guys who had a problem with protecting all of the bad apples. I would tell them all this at the conventions and I didn't care about the threats I got when I did. My sheriff buddies from my area told everyone I was one of them which gave me some comfort. I was just labeled the crazy Librul ambulance chaser.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Ms. Toad
(34,000 posts)Much of the information in the database is incomplete - the above link can be used to help complete it! Let's put DU energy on this issue to good use!
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)any personal knowledge of anyone killed by law enforcement, so I'm not sure what I'll be able to contribute. But I will take a look.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)by the police. I am so glad that finally this issue is getting some attention.
This should become a project, to find the names of all the victims of police brutality and give them the respect they deserve.
It's no surprise they don't want the people to know what they are doing.
I am beginning to think we need an outside intervention in this country. Our government doesn't seem to be interested in much about these horrendous crimes against their own people.
jayschool
(180 posts)Just like every other state.
CU News Corps
Muddled coroners reports are partly to blame.
CU News Corps again
mwooldri
(10,301 posts)It has an index page by year and month categorizing each human death that involved law enforcement officers - irrespective of whether the intervention was warranted or not. Canada has its list on one page. The UK's page is quite slim.
If the entire combined police forces in the United Kingdom fired less rounds this year than that ex-officer in Ferguson in one incident, and if the number of deaths involving law enforcement for this month alone is approaching the number the UK has had since 2001.... what does that tell you?
Enough said.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)"police were forced to shoot... "Police had no choice ... " etc. they'll be cut off if they imply anything negative about police actions
pa28
(6,145 posts)I like the fact the officers involved are named as well.
MoreGOPoop
(417 posts)The totals will most likely stun & motivate the People of the World. I've
contended the last couple years that we are but one WikiLeak away from
pitchforks. Thanks for this hugely important post, Hissyspit.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Otherwise people would be even more outraged that they currently are!