Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I lost an online bet to Will Pitt (Original Post) Dyedinthewoolliberal Feb 2015 OP
winning the Superbowl does not make them "best". eom uppityperson Feb 2015 #1
uhhh...yeah it does. trumad Feb 2015 #2
For this year... It does. Agschmid Feb 2015 #3
You are right. They really should have a tournament that decides the best team. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #4
That's not how you decide who's the best. Dr. Strange Feb 2015 #7
Or maybe a series of playoff games with the winners advancing ... 11 Bravo Feb 2015 #10
that's crazy talk. Nobody would watch something like that, it would take WEEKS! Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #11
For purposes of this bet it does Dyedinthewoolliberal Feb 2015 #5
Yes, it does. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #8
The patriots problem last night was defense against the seahawks not offense. Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #9
Hah pipi_k Feb 2015 #12
hehehe Marrah_G Feb 2015 #6

Dr. Strange

(25,921 posts)
7. That's not how you decide who's the best.
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 12:22 AM
Feb 2015

You need a BCS-style system with computers, polls, and Skip Bayless commentary.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
10. Or maybe a series of playoff games with the winners advancing ...
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 09:45 AM
Feb 2015

until the last two surviving teams meet to decide a champion.
Wait … whut?

Dyedinthewoolliberal

(15,577 posts)
5. For purposes of this bet it does
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 12:16 AM
Feb 2015
but given the beset two out of three I'd still bet Seattle wins out. Can't understand that call that lost the game...........
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
8. Yes, it does.
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 12:23 AM
Feb 2015

It's sad, really. They didn't need to cheat to be the best. They just had to play the way they play.

Some of the games may have ended up closer had they not cheated all year long, but they would have still ended up as the best team in the NFL.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
9. The patriots problem last night was defense against the seahawks not offense.
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 09:38 AM
Feb 2015

Any theory that their offense was enhanced by cheating is full of fail. For example, where were all the fumbles? For two weeks people have been claiming that their low fumble rate was simply due to under-inflated footballs, not that they actually had any evidence of under-inflated footballs for any game except one, but that was the claim. For example: Brady threw for a superbowl record number of completions. Hmmmm.... not impacted at all by non-deflated footballs. The air seems to have gone out of deflategate, and all we are left with is the bitter dead-enders desperately clinging to some hopeless factless theory.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
12. Hah
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 12:18 PM
Feb 2015
Some of the games may have ended up closer had they not cheated all year long, but they would have still ended up as the best team in the NFL.


Closer?

You mean like the game against the Ravens when they were supposedly still "cheating" and didn't blow them out?


And closer, like when they killed the Colts in the second half supposedly after the balls were properly inflated?


And how come they didn't cheat against Kansas City? Especially when I'm sure they knew they didn't exactly have a championship-level team at that point?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I lost an online bet to W...