Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 03:38 PM Feb 2015

Mr. Putin Resumes His War in Ukraine

The fighting in eastern Ukraine has flared up again, putting an end to any myth about the cease-fire that was supposed to be in force since September.

Though the Russian economy is staggering under the twinned onslaught of low oil prices and sanctions — or, conceivably, as a result of that onslaught — President Vladimir Putin has sharply cranked up his direct support for the rebels in the provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk, while continuing to baldly deny it and to blame all the violence on the United States.

Meanwhile, Ukraine is broke, and without the military means to move against the Russian-backed rebels. Most of the victims are civilians who struggle with hunger and dislocation in the rubble of the combat zones and die in the constant exchanges of shells and rockets.

The eruption of fighting in recent weeks, which was not supposed to happen until spring, has given new force to pleas to the Obama administration to give Ukraine the means to resist Mr. Putin — in money and in arms.

Certainly the United States and Europe should increase their aid to Ukraine and explore ways to expand existing sanctions against Russia. NATO’s commander, Gen. Philip Breedlove, is said to support providing weapons and equipment to Kiev. And Secretary of State John Kerry is said to be open to discussing the idea. But lethal assistance could open a dangerous new chapter in the struggle — a chapter Mr. Putin would quite possibly welcome, as it would “confirm” his propaganda claims of Western aggression.


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/02/opinion/mr-putin-resumes-his-war-in-ukraine.html



Sid
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mr. Putin Resumes His War in Ukraine (Original Post) SidDithers Feb 2015 OP
And his personal RT Force Repost Marines Codeine Feb 2015 #1
Just because much of this new fighting is focused on the potential land bridge from Russia to Crimea pampango Feb 2015 #2
I'll believe it when I read it in RT. 11 Bravo Feb 2015 #3
Nah, they only show up in their own threads because they care FSogol Feb 2015 #9
putin wants to restore the soviet union via conquest nt msongs Feb 2015 #4
I don't like Putin and sadoldgirl Feb 2015 #5
... NuclearDem Feb 2015 #6
And that's your defense? Igel Feb 2015 #7
Unfortunately the US hasn't a moral leg to stand on either. elias49 Feb 2015 #8
LOL @ NYTimes Jesus Malverde Feb 2015 #10

pampango

(24,692 posts)
2. Just because much of this new fighting is focused on the potential land bridge from Russia to Crimea
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 03:48 PM
Feb 2015

does not mean that Mr. Putin sees any Russian advantage to this offensive. I'm sure he just views this as a happy coincidence. The fact that these provinces are majority ethnic-Ukrainian does not really enter into the discussion when you need access to Crimea by land.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
3. I'll believe it when I read it in RT.
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 03:52 PM
Feb 2015

No doubt DU's favorite apologist/fluffer for Vlad the Shirtless will be along directly to set you straight.

FSogol

(45,488 posts)
9. Nah, they only show up in their own threads because they care
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 08:21 PM
Feb 2015

Last edited Mon Feb 2, 2015, 09:12 PM - Edit history (1)

about discussion or something. Replying to them is a waste of time since they are only interested in kicking their lame propaganda.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
5. I don't like Putin and
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 04:18 PM
Feb 2015

I don't believe the NYT anymore after its support for the
Iraq war.
I said it before: Leave that problem to the Europeans! It is
not ours to solve, and

BTW, do any of you supporting US interference in the Ukraine
remember the Monroe doctrine????

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
6. ...
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 04:22 PM
Feb 2015

First point, being signatories to Budapest, it is our problem when another party breaks its obligations. Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for assurances from the US, UK, and Russia to respect its territory. Russia violated that with the invasion of Crimea.

Second, I doubt you're going to find defenders of the Monroe Doctrine here. The US has about as much business telling other Western Hemisphere countries how to decide their own fate as Russia has telling the Baltics and other Eastern European countries the same. In fact, the only imperialist defenses I've seen here have been from people arguing that countries like Ukraine and Lithuania should exist as buffer states between NATO and Russia, their own populations' wishes be damned.

Igel

(35,317 posts)
7. And that's your defense?
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 08:03 PM
Feb 2015

To argue that Russia has a moral leg to stand on by resorting to the imperialist, hegemonic expression of power during a time when the US was avowedly racist?

Perhaps we should go back to those good ol' days and again achieve the moral high road that Russia now treads. (And here's where we burst out into a rousing chorus of "I was I was in the land o' cotton, old times there are not forgotten...." while strutting across the stage dragging a cannon to invade Mexico with.)

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
8. Unfortunately the US hasn't a moral leg to stand on either.
Mon Feb 2, 2015, 08:09 PM
Feb 2015

The US is the true hegemon. And going broke in the process. Not unlike Russia.
What a lovely world.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mr. Putin Resumes His War...