General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsclarence thomas--in HOW MANY STATES would YOUR marriage have been illegal just
a few years ago?????? as I thought, and someone else agreed, you are of the "IGMFU" mindset (helpfully translated as "I got mine--f*** you!"
to have such an ignorant, grasping, greedy, bigoted jerk on the highest court in the land is an obscenity.
(oh, and clarence, we all know anita hill was telling the truth!)
mythology
(9,527 posts)He really is a pathetic tiny little gnat of a man.
niyad
(113,325 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Of course he's paid to be white. I wonder if he would 'choose' to be teh gay if there was enough green in it.
Now my face is teh red.
*Gay isn't a choice, but hatred is.
niyad
(113,325 posts)Hekate
(90,708 posts)Justice Thurgood Marshall was a giant among men. Silent Clarence stands on Thurgood Marshall's shoulders and imagines he got where he is all by himself.
niyad
(113,325 posts)with a great deal of satisfaction.
calimary
(81,304 posts)dog park. Not fit to touch the hem of Thurgood Marshall's garment. Utterly useless excuse for a human being. AND that crazy woman he's married to!
ChosenUnWisely
(588 posts)He is intellectually lazy and does what he is told by his owners
He is black judge replacing a black judge, in the eyes of the RW it is an even trade
The #1 reason why they picked Thomas, it was a lame attempt to taint the legacy of Thurgood Marshall and all future black justices on the court. Basically Thomas fit the stereotype of the type of African American that is acceptable to the RW
.compliant and silent.
Thurgood Marshall as a young lawyer changed America and the world with the Brown case. Thomas, well he did noting except sexually harass some women.
The RW has been pissed off about it ever since.
msongs
(67,413 posts)"states' rights" as they have been applied against other groups of humans
niyad
(113,325 posts)leftieNanner
(15,114 posts)Clarence Thomas has no business holding that seat.
CanonRay
(14,104 posts)Damned auto correct won't let me type Thurgood
niyad
(113,325 posts)That was just awesome niyad.
Brava~
niyad
(113,325 posts)Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)He is about as qualified to serve on SCOTUS as I am - and I have much more integrity than this fool.
MarianJack
(10,237 posts)...she WAS telling the truth!
PEACE!
calimary
(81,304 posts)Of course, he's the first guy who wants to use the ladder to climb up to greater things, and then pull the ladder up behind him so nobody else has that kind of access or advantage. IGMFU.
niyad
(113,325 posts)MurrayDelph
(5,299 posts)so that he can pretend there never was a ladder.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)even thought the SCOTUS ruled in favor of interracial marriage the law making illegal remained in some of the southern states up till the '80's. I'd have to research but I'm almost positive. My parents (interracial marriage) wouldn't drive through the south to my dads family home in Alabama because they didn't know what would happen. It wasn't until like the 90's that my dad felt comfortable driving--mostly cuz of the small towns I think.
At almost 80 he's seen some shit and can tell some stories. My mom often talks about the riots in Wilmington Delaware--but that's a whole 'nother thread.
George II
(67,782 posts)niyad
(113,325 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....even if he doesn't agree with it.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)niyad
(113,325 posts)nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)with the virtual brain-death of American conservatism.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Interracial marriages. Bottom line, allow those who care for each other to marry as long as it is age appropriate. It has bothered me for years the simple fact of excluding loved ones from being together because they are not "family". Too many times in the past family members through anger excluded partners from hospital rooms. Too sad.
RKP5637
(67,109 posts)does not belong on SCOTUS.
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)of Thomas. Of course, to understand your position, he would have to have Scalia explain it to him. I have yet to understand how this most unqualified, mindless right-wing nut job got his sorry ass sat in Thurgood Marshall's seat.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)50 years ago, many Americans in the South would have been angry about your marriage.
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967),[1] was a landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court which invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Recognize for same-sex couples the right you enjoy yourself: marriage with the person they love.