Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(26,742 posts)
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 11:16 PM Feb 2015

Back to Yucca Mountain

By (Washington Post) Editorial Board

But the regulatory process had already begun, resulting in the NRC report. The country’s nuclear regulators found that the Yucca facility would have been technically sound. They considered the potential for corrosion, cracking, damage from seismic activity and unintentional human intrusion. They gamed out the likelihood of breaches over massive time scales — up to a million years from now. Everything checked out, with a few conditions. The NRC’s experts, for example, would have barred planes from flying directly over the site. They also noted that if the federal government restarted work on Yucca, officials would have to obtain certain land and water rights from the state.

This means, firstly, that opponents of nuclear power who raise the spectre of radioactive waste haunting humanity hundreds of thousands of years from now wildly exaggerate the difficulty of the problem. Nothing is risk-free, but there are ways to make the risks extremely small. Nuclear power, meanwhile, is likely to play a part in responding to a much more important environmental threat: climate change.

The NRC report’s conclusions also show that Nevadans’ intense opposition to the Yucca project is unreasonable, unambiguously harmful to the country and should end. In a rational world, the NRC’s report would result in Nevadans backing down, Congress restoring funding and the Obama administration pushing Yucca along. This could fit neatly into the administration’s plan for nuclear waste, which foresees moving waste off reactor sites to interim storage facilities, then to a permanent repository when it’s ready. There’s no technical reason that the permanent repository shouldn’t be Yucca Mountain.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/leaving-yucca-mountain/2015/02/08/101fccac-a8cd-11e4-a7c2-03d37af98440_story.html
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Back to Yucca Mountain (Original Post) FBaggins Feb 2015 OP
WP are nuke whores RobertEarl Feb 2015 #1
I heard from a reliable source that Bundy ranch is next in line for a nuke dump site. NBachers Feb 2015 #2
As a Nevadan... kiva Feb 2015 #3
Countdown to anti-Yucca Nevadans being equated to 'anti-vaxx woo-loving closeupready Feb 2015 #4
Interesting that you should mention that... FBaggins Feb 2015 #5
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
1. WP are nuke whores
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 11:21 PM
Feb 2015

They would sell their mothers to nukes for pennies, as they certainly are willing to sell their children to the death and destruction nuclear waste will cause.

Screw the WP and their nuke lies!!

NBachers

(17,110 posts)
2. I heard from a reliable source that Bundy ranch is next in line for a nuke dump site.
Mon Feb 9, 2015, 11:47 PM
Feb 2015

Don't tell anyone.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
4. Countdown to anti-Yucca Nevadans being equated to 'anti-vaxx woo-loving
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:57 AM
Feb 2015

Jenny McCarthy breastfeeding wannbes' in 5 ... 4... 3... 2...

FBaggins

(26,742 posts)
5. Interesting that you should mention that...
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 07:09 AM
Feb 2015

... since the first reply comes from someone that fits the bill quite well (at least on the first two).

Nevadans? Nah... that's just standard NIMBYism. But their opinion may start to shift now that the reports that Reid has been suppressing are finally public.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Back to Yucca Mountain