Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,994 posts)
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:04 AM Feb 2015

David Axelrod: Obama Was 'Bullshitting' Opposition To Gay Marriage In 2008

David Axelrod: Obama Was 'Bullshitting' Opposition To Gay Marriage In 2008

Time magazine reported Tuesday that the longtime Obama confidant said in his new book, "Believer: My Forty Years in Politics," that he counseled then-senator Obama to soften his position on gay marriage for political reasons.

.................

Obama had stated his support for legalizing gay marriage on a 1996 questionnaire while running for the Illinois state Senate. But he said repeatedly on the campaign trail in 2008 that he believed marriage should be between a man and a woman.

Publicly stating opposition to gay marriage took its toll on Obama, who Axelrod wrote "routinely stumbled over the question when it came up in debates or interviews."

"I’m just not very good at bullshitting,"
Obama told Axelrod after one of those events, as quoted by Time.


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/david-axelrod-obama-bullshitting-gay-marriage

67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
David Axelrod: Obama Was 'Bullshitting' Opposition To Gay Marriage In 2008 (Original Post) kpete Feb 2015 OP
Well that explains Obama inviting Rick Warren to speak at his inauguration. GeorgeGist Feb 2015 #1
Hillary outside Feb 2015 #38
I don't think they lied. They both see that they have to go with the times. cui bono Feb 2015 #51
David Axelrod outside Feb 2015 #58
If he really was lying then he purposely aided in the oppression. cui bono Feb 2015 #62
This is going to cause some cognitive dissonance. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #2
For the record, I've never said that a bout Warren. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #4
I'm convinced she isn't currently running. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #5
Since you are not a Democrat, whether or not she runs is meaningless to you. eom MohRokTah Feb 2015 #6
Hardly. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #8
Well, Elizabeth Warren has emphatically removed herelf from the running. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #9
Oh, and thanks for making this thread about Warren. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #10
Me? I made a single comment, you replied, etc. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #12
Your single comment made the thread about Warren. eom MohRokTah Feb 2015 #13
If it bothers you that much, we can both self-delete the entire set of comments. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #14
Nah, I'll just keep responding to you. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #15
The problem for warren is she actually was a republican JI7 Feb 2015 #17
Was she a Goldwater Girl like Hillary? n/t nichomachus Feb 2015 #61
no. she was about 30 years older JI7 Feb 2015 #66
Jesus. Who's floating that argument about Warren? DirkGently Feb 2015 #37
I thought it was going to cause a problem for people who "believed him" snooper2 Feb 2015 #46
To choose some incredibly arbitrary number Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2015 #49
Missed it by a few minutes MohRokTah Feb 2015 #3
So, basically, nothing that he says is to be taken seriously. djean111 Feb 2015 #7
. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #11
Because that should be the takeaway from an article about gay rights? msanthrope Feb 2015 #16
Bullshitting about his stance on marriage equality is why we are where we are now on the issue. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #18
And he deftly removed a wedge issue for the MCCain/Palin camp to use. nt msanthrope Feb 2015 #19
And he quietly worked behind the scenes to get us where we are today. eom MohRokTah Feb 2015 #20
Quietly? He stirred dustclouds of swirling shit at the Pentagon...nt. msanthrope Feb 2015 #22
Well, that was after he announced how he had "evolved" on the issue. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #23
Well we can agree on that. randys1 Feb 2015 #57
yes. anyone who saw what he said before running for president JI7 Feb 2015 #21
More like: "Nothing he says should be taken at face value" Act_of_Reparation Feb 2015 #27
This is why I never watch his speeches. Deeds not words. Every time. djean111 Feb 2015 #39
I would hope our president's motivations are more practical than my admiration. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2015 #59
Exactly.... ann--- Feb 2015 #32
Sure you did. eom BlueCaliDem Feb 2015 #35
oh you poor thing wendylaroux Feb 2015 #45
Cool story, bro. eom MohRokTah Feb 2015 #55
Yeah, I knew this. I had some exposure to Obama's ways prior to his candidacy so I knew to listen to Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #24
Subtelty, negotiation skills, quietly manipulating the political system.... Sheepshank Feb 2015 #36
Yep, those folks are busy congratulating themselves on trite and pedestrian attempts at humor like stevenleser Feb 2015 #65
And halfway through his second term, marriage equality is MineralMan Feb 2015 #25
I think this is an example of how Barack Obama is probably the most skilled politician since FDR. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #28
That could be. It could also be that the time when this country MineralMan Feb 2015 #30
I lost a dear friend, Greg, recently. AfAm man my age who LOVED that we finally had a Black Prez randys1 Feb 2015 #64
No surprise. I've thought that all along. marmar Feb 2015 #26
so, it was like we said bigtree Feb 2015 #29
He did what needed to be done to persuade Democrats who were opposed to equality to favor it. Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #41
well, there is that bigtree Feb 2015 #50
Better that he was a liar than a bigot. Nye Bevan Feb 2015 #31
No, it isn't ann--- Feb 2015 #33
" Wait till the other shoes drop about this guy." PragmaticLiberal Feb 2015 #42
Either the "Mooslim" thing or the "birth certificate" thing. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #56
I don't think thats what ann meant. PragmaticLiberal Feb 2015 #63
What???!! wendylaroux Feb 2015 #47
I have never had any doubt that President Obama was pro-equal rights in all ways, even gay marriage. BlueCaliDem Feb 2015 #34
Opposing gay marriage was ALWAYS the wrong thing to do, no matter the reason. alarimer Feb 2015 #40
Politicians lie!!???!! Next we'll be told that ducks quack. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2015 #43
yeah, right. KG Feb 2015 #44
Like that wasn't already obvious. Vattel Feb 2015 #48
In other words, he purposely aided in the oppression of gays for personal political gain. cui bono Feb 2015 #52
No, he's actually pretty good at bullshitting. TwilightGardener Feb 2015 #53
Not buying it. NCTraveler Feb 2015 #54
I think he's selling himself short nichomachus Feb 2015 #60
Not surprising at all, Obama is the consummate politician. tritsofme Feb 2015 #67
 

outside

(70 posts)
38. Hillary
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:23 PM
Feb 2015

was also against same sex marriage at that time and I saw her speak at Rick Warren Saddleback church in 2007. President Obama and HRC both lied about that subject.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
51. I don't think they lied. They both see that they have to go with the times.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 03:17 PM
Feb 2015

People don't care if there is same sex marriage anymore for the most part. If they stuck to being against it they would be siding with the minority now, especially if you only take the Dem Party.

They are politicians through and through and they say what they need to at any given time. Obama only came out for it after Biden said he was fine with it. If Biden hadn't opened his mouth would Obama have even thought about changing his stance?

 

outside

(70 posts)
58. David Axelrod
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 03:51 PM
Feb 2015

said the President was "bullshitting" and the Ax ran the campaign. The President only changed his tune when he needed money from the LGBT groups.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
62. If he really was lying then he purposely aided in the oppression.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 04:24 PM
Feb 2015

I agree that he changed what he said for political expediency.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. This is going to cause some cognitive dissonance.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:13 AM
Feb 2015

Among the people who say that people who lie aren't fit for office, while still supporting President Obama. One of the current anti-Warren memes is that if she did decide to run for office finally, that would make her a horrible liar for saying she has no intention to run and isn't running and is thus 'ineligible for office'. But besides this, we've seen that the current favorite 'anti-Warren' candidate is 'Bosnian sniper fire dodging' HRC.

I think they're going to have to give up on 'lying makes you ineligible for office', or never see another person ever elected President.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
4. For the record, I've never said that a bout Warren.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:15 AM
Feb 2015

I am 100% convinced she is not running, though. I also firmly believe no amount of wishful thinking will alter the fact that Warren is not running.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
5. I'm convinced she isn't currently running.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:18 AM
Feb 2015

Just as HRC isn't running.

I'll wait until the filing deadline or an earlier 'Running' announcement to be 100% sure.

Not that I can vote for either in a primary, since I'm a Dem Socialist, not a Dem.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
8. Hardly.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:20 AM
Feb 2015

Who ultimately becomes President is as important to me as it is to you. Thus, all party candidates are important until such time as they are knocked out of the running.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
9. Well, Elizabeth Warren has emphatically removed herelf from the running.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:21 AM
Feb 2015

She's done so many times.

So she should not be on your radar.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
10. Oh, and thanks for making this thread about Warren.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:22 AM
Feb 2015

At least it's kept it kicked to the top and people will read about how Obama supported marriage equality all along.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
12. Me? I made a single comment, you replied, etc.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:24 AM
Feb 2015

Looks like you 'made it about Warren' as much as I did.

Left unreplied to, mine would simply have been one comment among many.

JI7

(89,250 posts)
17. The problem for warren is she actually was a republican
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:33 AM
Feb 2015

Into adult life. This would only hurt her in the pRimary. But it would help her in the general election.

Nobody cares about politicians who may have said they wont run but do end up running. Most can understand the decision to do so involves a lot of thought and people can change their mind.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
37. Jesus. Who's floating that argument about Warren?
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:23 PM
Feb 2015

Changing your mind isn't "lying."

Whoever's trying that is being incredibly lame and dishonest themselves.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
46. I thought it was going to cause a problem for people who "believed him"
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 01:53 PM
Feb 2015

and then when he "changed his mind" took credit...

because of...

Posting online and stuff got his attention

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
49. To choose some incredibly arbitrary number
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 01:57 PM
Feb 2015

99.99% of the time, politicians totally ignore anything posted online. That last .01%? Almost always something posted online by one of the 0.1% who are the main constituency. When any politician, even those I 'like', changes a position, I assume money or power was involved.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
3. Missed it by a few minutes
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:13 AM
Feb 2015

I'll delete my thread and add my comment from that thread here.

I suspected this at the time. Politicians must be pragmatic to get elected. By bullshitting on the issue in 2008, Obama insured this country would be where it is today on the issue.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
16. Because that should be the takeaway from an article about gay rights?
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:31 AM
Feb 2015

You know what I takeaway from this??? That thank the non-existent Christ he did lie.....

Think about gay rights with a McCain presidency.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
18. Bullshitting about his stance on marriage equality is why we are where we are now on the issue.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:36 AM
Feb 2015

But some will do anything to give a dig on our President.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
57. Well we can agree on that.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 03:44 PM
Feb 2015

Obama did what he had to do to get to where we are today.

On many issues.

Including this one.

He plays poker way better than the racist assholes who oppose him for no other reason than the color of his skin.

JI7

(89,250 posts)
21. yes. anyone who saw what he said before running for president
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:38 AM
Feb 2015

Could see he was not opposed to it.

He probably got lucky in McCain not exploiting the issue because they could easily have brought up what he said before and questioned his stand on it.

Only reason I'm ok with it is because i knew he would and has worked to get gay rights passed and been very public with his support .

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
27. More like: "Nothing he says should be taken at face value"
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:50 AM
Feb 2015

He's the president. Everything he says should be taken seriously.

But people need to be realistic about politics. It is a game, and if you want to get anything done, you have to play the game and play it well.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
39. This is why I never watch his speeches. Deeds not words. Every time.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:24 PM
Feb 2015

And for those who say oh, well, for gay rights, of COURSE he was lying, just to get elected. Do you just pick the lies or non-follow-throughs that you personally like? That was the only thing he lied about in order to get elected?
Is saying he would re-negotiate the bad NAFTA, and then not only not doing that, but tripling down on a much worse TPP - is that admirable, too? Not to me.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
59. I would hope our president's motivations are more practical than my admiration.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 04:08 PM
Feb 2015

Because if it is kudos he's looking for, he's barking up the wrong tree. My admiration isn't given out lightly, and it is rarely given out to people who have made careers out of politics.

That said, there's an old saying you should probably consider: "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."

Obama isn't the progressive we really want in office; but, as a candidate, he was better than the other guy, and he was electable. Given the situation we were in, Obama was and remains better than our other options. If he had to lie about his position on marriage equality to get elected... no, it's not admirable, but we are still in a better place than we would have been if he came out with a hardline stance and lost because of it.

Personally, I'm of the opinion that the marriage equality war is all but won at this point, and the true victors aren't going to be the guys on Capitol Hill. The real people who are going to win this war are our LGBT brothers and sisters who fought tooth and nail for decades to get it through to straight, cis folks like myself that this is a civil rights issue that needs to be addressed. They're the real heroes here, and the people most deserving of our admiration.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
24. Yeah, I knew this. I had some exposure to Obama's ways prior to his candidacy so I knew to listen to
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:46 AM
Feb 2015

him carefully and I knew he was a rare person who can at times put ego aside and play the opposition to serve the advocates. He told LGBT people and everyone else to be the change we wanted and to hold his feet to the fire. That, to me, was very clear. Many people who claim to be 'supporting Obama' by echoing his positions played their parts as well, but had they caught on to the process they might have been able to advocate their own agendas more effectively by holding to them rather than adapting them to fit Obama's spoken positions. Those who helped Obama attain his objectives were the actual supporters of the President's agenda, and that paradigm continues today. Nodding along with Barack is not what he has asked of anyone. Those who do that do it for themselves, not for Obama.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
36. Subtelty, negotiation skills, quietly manipulating the political system....
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:21 PM
Feb 2015

...playing the cards close to his chest, misdirecting the media and Republicans, all of these nuances and more are lost on the crowd that screams the media bull crap. They are so busy being angry at step 1 of the plan and negotiations, they forget to recognize the successes of Obama on the final outcome.... that so often had been 180 Deg from starting point. Gay Marriage is the point at hand. So while you may not like the head bobbers, there is another very vocal crowd shaking their head at everything and anything, completely missing what had just happened.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
65. Yep, those folks are busy congratulating themselves on trite and pedestrian attempts at humor like
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 05:48 PM
Feb 2015

"n-th dimensional chess" and as you said end up "completely missing what had just happened".

and to quote you some more, "they forget to recognize the successes of Obama on the final outcome" of a lot of issues now, despite persistent and withering opposition that I think would have stopped folks like LBJ and FDR in their tracks.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
25. And halfway through his second term, marriage equality is
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:47 AM
Feb 2015

just about to become the law of the land. Interesting, isn't it?

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
28. I think this is an example of how Barack Obama is probably the most skilled politician since FDR.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:52 AM
Feb 2015

He is truly skilled at understanding what is possible and how to make what is currently impossible become possible over a period of time.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
30. That could be. It could also be that the time when this country
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:59 AM
Feb 2015

was ready to get rid of that injustice had arrived. There's no question about Barack Obama's skills at getting things done. He got rid of DADT at a time I didn't think that could get through Congress. It took some give and take, of course, but it happened. I really have no idea how he felt about marriage equality, but he certainly added his support for it at a critical time.

In Minnesota, it wouldn't have happened, except that Obama's win of a second term swept a Democratic majority into our state legislature, and the new legislature made marriage equality a priority the next year. In 2012, there was a constitutional amendment on our ballot that would have banned same-sex marriage. Democratic turnout to re-elect Obama sent that down to defeat, along with a voter ID amendment.

The fact is that Obama's popularity made many things possible. I give him credit for a number of things, even if that credit is accidental.

The fact that marriage equality has succeeded is largely due to his election for two terms.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
64. I lost a dear friend, Greg, recently. AfAm man my age who LOVED that we finally had a Black Prez
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 05:42 PM
Feb 2015

and that Obama was many many steps ahead of everybody on everything.

We communicated almost everyday and his happiness that there was a Black President, was contagious.

We together were two of his biggest boosters.

I went somewhere and came back, was without cell/internet service and the first email I read from a mutual friend I learned of his passing.

Fuck

As a goofy white guy I was a huge supporter of Obama from get go, but when Greg and I got together on it I felt different somehow.

Even though I am a big supporter of his and will be of Hillary too if I have to, I would also criticize the Prez on many things, Greg would always defend him and we both laughed about that.

I miss my friend, I miss that he isnt here today to see the Obama that is taking it, overtly, to the assholes.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
29. so, it was like we said
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:57 AM
Feb 2015

...for base, petty, calculating politics.

I don't know which of them is worse on this - Axelrod or Barack Obama.

What else is he 'bullshitting' on...badly?

This is the kind of politics which causes people to turn away from the democratic process. The idea that he would have lost by taking a firm stand is ludicrous, given that public opinion didn't just magically change on the issue two years later in his term; nor did it turn on his statement in that interview affirming his support for gay marriage; nor did it turn on Biden's prompting 'gaffe'. Politicians like Barack Obama and others who rushed to affirm their support at the same time were rushing to catch the wave of open support that was overtaking their cautions political posturing. They were playing catch-up.

The question is not what would have happened to the Obama candidacy if he had been honest and consistent in his earlier support of gay marriage; it's how much more could have been gained by an honest and politically courageous approach. Timidity in the face of republican bigotry is what's made our party's political posture so wobbly at times and outright weak at others.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
41. He did what needed to be done to persuade Democrats who were opposed to equality to favor it.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 01:11 PM
Feb 2015

The bigotry we were working against was in our own Party. Want links to DU's 'Obama supporters' echoing his views 'you people have plenty of rights already' and 'there is only one right you don't have' and 'gay marriage is to me unthinkable, the Bible says it is wrong'. Those folks are still on DU, claiming that they are 'The Obama Supporters' and those of us who actually assisted in this victory, we are 'Obama Critics'.
The morning of Nov 5 2014, day after huge electoral victory in my State, the first OP I read on DU blamed gay people for the losses in other states:
"The openness and brazenness of the LBGT agenda and the media flaunting of gay marriages all across the country cost Dems dearly and threatens to do so in the future."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025764803#post45

That poster remains as well.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
50. well, there is that
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 03:14 PM
Feb 2015

...I still believe his statement, from his elevated office, has great political importance; my disgust at his motivations and prevarication, notwithstanding.

 

ann---

(1,933 posts)
33. No, it isn't
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:11 PM
Feb 2015

An honest public official shouldn't be EITHER. Wait till the other shoes drop about this guy.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
56. Either the "Mooslim" thing or the "birth certificate" thing.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 03:39 PM
Feb 2015

At least, anybody talking about "another shoe dropping about this guy" when referring to Obama usually means one of those two (or both).

PragmaticLiberal

(904 posts)
63. I don't think thats what ann meant.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 04:53 PM
Feb 2015

Go back and read what ann was responding to.

It puts her response in a different context..

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
34. I have never had any doubt that President Obama was pro-equal rights in all ways, even gay marriage.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:19 PM
Feb 2015

I know he had to pretend he wasn't because of the stupidity and prejudices of the larger American electorate, and he needed to get elected in order to appease their tiny, uninformed, undereducated, scared-of-changed and brainwashed-by-corporate-u.s.-media minds. Add to that, Republicans were chomping at the bit to find the slightest error in order to escalated their hatred of him the moment he got elected as they tried to snatch Congress back from Democrats, and were pretty much successful what with a cooperative media to polish up those turds and make them smell like roses for Republican political gain.

But I have never had any doubt that President Obama would quietly work behind-the-scenes to ensure that he battled discrimination everywhere he could.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
40. Opposing gay marriage was ALWAYS the wrong thing to do, no matter the reason.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 12:58 PM
Feb 2015

A politician's job, I guess, is not to have opinions of their own, but to blow with whatever prevailing winds blow. Which is why I despise all politicians, no matter how good they are at the politics.

I can never know when they are sincere and when they are bullshitting. I suspect most of them are bullshitting most of the time.

And there's something about anyone who actually wants to be in politics that I can never quite trust.

I know they are lying 90% of the time. Their lips are moving.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
52. In other words, he purposely aided in the oppression of gays for personal political gain.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 03:23 PM
Feb 2015

Except I don't believe this story. And if true then why would anyone blindly defend him? That's crazy. That is immoral for him to aid the oppression gays for his own career.

Unfortunately for us and our country, there's plenty of other things he really was bullshitting about.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
54. Not buying it.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 03:33 PM
Feb 2015

Obama has spent the overwhelming majority of his adult life opposed to equal rights. How do I know this? He told me.

tritsofme

(17,379 posts)
67. Not surprising at all, Obama is the consummate politician.
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 08:59 PM
Feb 2015

It was obvious to anyone that his "evolution" was based on the politics of the moment, not principles.

This doesn't make him "bad" it makes him a politician, one of the most successful in a generation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»David Axelrod: Obama Was ...