General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGuy Who Gets Paid to Say Obamacare Doesn’t Work Can’t Find a Single True Fact to Support His Case
By Jonathan Chait
Obamacare has increased enrollment in its health care exchanges to more than 11 million, and the conservative response to the laws demonstrable success at carrying out its goals has been fascinating to behold. Measured by volume, the right-wing backlash has diminished severely, as great roaring waves of furious anger have given way to irregular ripples of discontent. But measured by its content, very little has changed. Conservatives are talking much less than they used to about Obamacare, but they are saying more or less the same things, treating the law as a costly and obvious failure. Whats most striking is how oblivious most of them remain not only to measures of the laws success, but even to the broad parameters of its objectives.
To take a typical example, here is Stephen Moore, chief economist at the Heritage Foundation, making his case, such as it is, that Obamacare has failed to meet its cost targets. Perhaps the most revealing aspect of Moores column is the fact that, five years after its passage, the chief economist of the most influential conservative think tank in the United States lacks even a passing familiarity with its fiscal objectives.
Obamacare has two fiscal goals. The first is to pay for its expanded coverage with a combination of spending cuts and higher taxes, so that the net effect is to reduce the deficit. The second, and more ambitious, goal is to change the incentives of the health-care system to gradually bring down health-care inflation (a goal health-care wonks have called bending the curve). Moores column, which I am excerpting in its entirety, makes clear he does not understand either target. Moore begins by defining Obamacares goal as reducing the deficit:
A new Congressional Budget Office report has blown the lid off the Obama whopper fib.
Keep in mind what Moore is claiming here. Obama promised that the ACA would reduce the deficit, and according to Moore, the Congressional Budget Office has a new report showing this promise was false. If true, this would be enormous news. In fact, no such finding exists. CBO originally estimated that Obamacare would reduce the deficit. It correspondingly estimated for the next several years that repealing the law would increase the deficit. CBO stopped issuing cost estimates of the overall law. It did, however, report that its estimate of the laws gross costs the spending on coverage has been falling, rather than rising. Indeed, the federal government is now projected to spend less on health care than it was projected to spend before Obamacare was passed:
more
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/02/obamacare-hater-cant-find-single-true-fact.html?wpsrc=nymag
randys1
(16,286 posts)had, in direct violation of his oath, his job, everything we hold dear.
Or who will act politically on everything BUT Obamacare; does he or doesnt he decide to gut ACA even though there isnt a single legal reason to do so?
I think if he does gut it, we should have a team of historians go to work full time writing the story of this SC and make sure it is taught in our schools.