General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCHARLES PIERCE - The Clinton Rules: "Every glitch is a crime, and every blunder is a conspiracy"
Hillary Finds A Rake To Step On: The First Clinton BombshellHillary Clinton's use of a private email account at the State Department raises questions and sparks conspiracy theories.
.................
What, precisely, is this woman's major malfunction? For going on 30 years, she has been the target of every strange conspiracy theory that the half-bright mind of man can dream up. She knows they're out there, pining to have a coldie with Vince Foster at the cocktail lounge of the Mena Airport. Just in the past six years, she's watched the Benghazi, Benghazi! BENGHAZI! dreamscape blossom lushly with the wilder flora planted in the public mind by the seedpod that is the brain of Darrell Issa. So she knew that what began with a bust-out Ozarks land deal had not faded just because her husband had skated through his second term. And still, we have this.
And let a thousand paranoids bloom.
She had to know what this would mean because she's lived her whole life under The Clinton Rules, by which every glitch is a crime, and every blunder is a conspiracy. It's not entirely fair, and we'll get to that in a minute, but somebody on the nascent campaign should have been D'd up for this kind of thing. A campaign by Hillary Clinton is a different thing, and anyone who doesn't know this by now is somebody who needs burping on the half-hour. This screw-up has all the earmarks of a campaign still laboring under the ghost of Mark Penn.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a33436/hillary-clinton-finds-a-rake-to-step-on-the-first-clinton-bombshell/
randys1
(16,286 posts)was removed from the scene as in running for President, could we mount a winning candidate?
If not, the country and maybe the human race, are finished.
I wish that was an exaggeration, think it through...Think it through to climate change, wars, etc.
I will forever be angry at her if this derails her AND we lose the WH
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)If so, that raises the question - during her tenure, what did she do to upgrade the systems into the 21rst century? Why didn't she raise hell that one of the most important tools our country has for NOT going to war was running on decades old and crappy tech?
Response to Erich Bloodaxe BSN (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)she personally used non-secure systems or didn't keep copies. Republicans are always talking smack about how useless and inefficient government is, so it's up to Dems to always make sure everything is as efficiently run as possible and kept up to date when they're in power to take away their talking points. Running government well, especially under Dems, makes Dems more electable and Republicans less so by revealing their malfeasance and negligence.
randys1
(16,286 posts)if she cant run, if we cant win, holy cow, the ramifications are unthinkable
Response to randys1 (Reply #6)
Name removed Message auto-removed
randys1
(16,286 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)If she's (or her staff) not up to it perhaps she should consider not running.
The Clintons bring a lot this crap on themselves with their arrogance.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)"Mrs. Clinton's advisers reviewed tens of thousands of pages of her personal emails and decided which ones to turn over to the State Department."
Yep, I feel so much better now knowing her advisers did the review.
Response to hedgehog (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Kingofalldems
(38,440 posts)with other Democrats.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)And is indeed a sign of how much They hate that.