Those of you who are anti-dynasty, would you vote for Hillary

[KamaAina]

if she ran under the name Hillary Rodham?

[In_The_Wind]

1. Yes. Hillary is still Hillary.

[notadmblnd]

2. if she wins the nomination, yes.

[CaliforniaPeggy]

3. That would make ZERO difference to me; it's still her. n/t

[LanternWaste]

4. Seems as through a simple name change wouldn't deter those whose votes are predicated on genetics

Seems as through a simple name change wouldn't deter those whose votes are wholly predicated on genetics and blood-lines.

[KamaAina]

9. Genetics?

Clinton is her married name.

[LanternWaste]

12. Dynasties, by definition, are predicated on blood lineage and more often than not, patrilineal succe

Dynasties, by definition, are predicated on blood lineage and more often than not, patrilineal successions.

If we (whoever "we" are) are going to use the concept of Dynasty as a reason to avoid her (or vote for her), we must be honest (to ourselves at least) in our knowledge of classical dynasties, agnaticism and dynastics.

[Ms. Toad]

5. Surely that's not a serious question. n/t

[cali]

6. huh? what on earth is your point? We all know who Hillary Clinton is

running under the name Rodham wouldn't lessen the dynasty factor. If the dynasty thing bothers someone, a name change won't make the slightest difference.

[bigwillq]

7. No

I will not be voting for Hillary. But if she wins the nomination and general, I will be fine with it. I just don't want to vote for her. So I won't.

I live in CT. The DEM nominee will win my state with or without my vote, so I am free to vote for someone else.

[PeaceNikki]

8. The Clintons are not a "Dynasty".

[KamaAina]

10. Tell it to about half of DU.

[HereSince1628]

13. The Europeans apparently don't see it that way

Of course I heard that on the evil progressive communist Tom Hartman radio show.

[Maedhros]

11. Regardless of name, Hillary represents the status quo.

So no, I won't vote for the status quo.