Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmtrak’s Spectrum Gap
http://www.nationofchange.org/2015/05/22/amtraks-spectrum-gap/In a December 2012 report, Amtraks inspector general wrote that formidable and significant challenges were delaying deployment of a safety system known as Positive Train Control, which identifies cars that are traveling at excessive speeds and automatically slows their progress. Four years earlier, Congress had required that Amtrak and other American rail companies add the technology to their operations, but only a fraction of the rail systems were by then covered. Had the PTC technology been in place in Philadelphia, federal regulators say, the derailment might well have been prevented.
The inspector generals 2012 report zeroed in on one missing element that was crucial to the broader deployment of the safety system: Amtrak had for years failed to acquire adequate rights to broadcast communications signals through the public airwaves. Without these so-called spectrum rights, Amtraks trains could not communicate with the electronic brains of the safety system, preventing its use along key stretches of track. This lack of spectrum had become the most serious challenge in the railroads efforts to deploy the safety equipment more broadly, Amtraks watchdog warned.
The failure to more quickly address this challenge seems like a story that the political world can oversimplify into a standard tale of cut-and-dry blame, featuring singular villains.
But in this saga, many factors appear to have contributed to the disaster.
For one, there was a lack of adequate resources. Flush with profits, private freight companies had the cash to buy the spectrum they needed for their own PTC system. By contrast, Congress did not provide Amtrak with the same resources.
There was also a lack of political will. When public transportation officials begged Congress to pass a bill ordering the FCC to give the railroad unused spectrum for free rather than selling it to private telecommunications firms, lawmakers refused.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 503 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amtrak’s Spectrum Gap (Original Post)
eridani
May 2015
OP
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)1. Congress is hell bent on strangling Amtrak to death financially
just like it is with the post office and slowly but surely it is working (I'm sure there are other examples as well). In Oregon if I want to travel between Portland and where my mother lives I have very few options when I go to visit.
Here are my options from most expensive to least expensive:
1) Fly into a small regional airport price: $300-400
2) Rent a car price: $250 (for 3-4 days plus gas)
3) Amtrak price: $60-75 (note this also requires a one hour drive to the station by my mom)
4) Greyhound: I don't have a deathwish, no thanks...........
As you can see Amtrak is the only moderately priced option (unless you want to risk your life and get on a bus with the psychopaths).
Wilms
(26,795 posts)2. Insane.
When public transportation officials begged Congress to pass a bill ordering the FCC to give the railroad unused spectrum for free rather than selling it to private telecommunications firms, lawmakers refused.
"Lawmakers". I'd like to know which ones.