General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumswhat will be the gop's new social (wedge) issues?
(an excellent article in the current issue of vanity fair)
What Will Be the G.O.P.s New Social Issue?
From marriage equality to abortion, many of the social wedge issues used by the G.O.P. have been losing steam. What will take their place in the 2016 race?
Governor Scott Walker, of Wisconsin, who is running for president, says he is personally opposed to gay marriage but takes the position that this is a matter for each of the 50 states to decide for itself. Nice try, Governor, but that train has pulled out of the station. The country has already accepted gay marriage, and its too late for half-measures. Leave it to the states is a hoary evasion for national politicians who want to duck a troublesome issue, but its not available to Walker, because governors of states cant duck an issue by saying it should be decided by the states. Well, they can try, but they shouldnt be allowed to get away with it. You are the governor, Governor. Man up (as Sarah Palin used to say) and tell us where you stand.
Its remarkable that a Republican running for the Republican nomination for president should need to be evasive about marriage equality, as opposed to using it as a cudgel. There were days, not long ago, when Republicans used to fabricate issues like this in order to embarrass the Democrats. Elderly readers may recall 1988, when George H. W. Bush beat Michael Dukakis in a vicious campaign almost entirely about artificial issues concocted in the G.O.P. laboratory, like the urgent need for an amendment to the Bill of Rights against burning the American flag. Twenty-seven years later the Bill of Rights remains pristine, there has been no serious effort to pollute it with an anti-flag-burning amendment, and yet there has been little if any flag burning going on. It will not be an issue in the 2016 campaign. There may be some vestigial sentence in the Republican Party platform, but no podium time will be wasted on it.
Regarding abortiona genuine social issuesomething similar has happened. Few people have actually changed their minds about the morality or legality of abortion, but Republicans dont look forward to arguing about it on the campaign trail. They wish it would just go away. They may honestly believe that human life begins at the moment of conception, or they may have adopted that position cynically, but in most places the candidates would just as soon not dwell on it.
Abortion, marriage equality, gun control, drugs, prayer in the schools, affirmative action, the War on Christmas: these are all classified as social issues (as opposed to economic and foreign-policy issues) and have generally been regarded as wedge issues tooissues that the Republicans can use like a wedge to pry voters away from the Democrats. But the wedge isnt what it used to be.
. . . .
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/06/republican-new-social-issues-class-divide
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Abortion, marriage equality, gun control, drugs, prayer in the schools, affirmative action, the War on Christmas are still there plus voter repression, destroy education, and attack science. And there is nothing to stop them from continuing to bash the ACA and to speak against equal marriage. I mean, just because the cases are settled ...
niyad
(113,594 posts)big_dog
(4,144 posts)plus personal educational vouchers to 'trickle down' the wealth to the parents and rob the unions
tatooedsn
(3 posts)They will spend the next 5 yrs trying to overrule the scotus decisions on gay marriage and the aca. I'm sure there will be some sort of attack on freedom, Christians or the Constitution we liberals accused of before too long.
niyad
(113,594 posts)Good to be on board with sane individuals
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)it will satisfy the crazy base.
welcome aboard!
ck4829
(35,093 posts)And everyone else who is not them has too much freedom.
As long as there is something that fits one or both of those things, the Republicans will be there, making it an issue.
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)niyad
(113,594 posts)Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)Takket
(21,639 posts)They will keep beating this dead horse of on the grounds of needing a GOP president and heavily GOP congress to amend the constitution, or needing the GOP president to put my repukes on SCOTUS to get this ruling undone.
brer cat
(24,621 posts)for including Hillary with those republican asses!!
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)I'm glad someone is pointing out that separating the social from the economic is a GOP strategy, and that's why it's so troubling when Team Hillary turns to this strategy to differentiate her from Bernie.
Freelancer
(2,107 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 26, 2015, 02:13 PM - Edit history (1)
What the GOP has succeeded in doing, that Democrats have not, is making their political opposition into ONE thing. If you love guns -- 'liberals' are after you. If you hate abortion -- 'liberals' are after you. If you love your religion -- 'liberals' are after you. If you love money -- 'liberals' are after you.
The Democratic side hasn't embraced the simplicity of making all their political adversaries into one thing. Those that want gun control see the NRA as their adversary. Those that want better wages and unions see the big business as the opposition. Those that want abortion to remain a woman's choice see religious groups as the other side. Dealing with a multiplicity of foes, rather than one, is psychologically exhausting. THEY ARE ALL ONE THING!!!
Hillary Clinton got it right years ago when she labeled it the "vast right-wing conspiracy" (sorry Sanders lovers). Many liberals bristle at that reduction, but the usefulness of it is huge.
Common adversary = common cause.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Stick a pin in it ...