Rachael Maddow just starting her opening monologue now

[bluestateguy]

and I'm sure in 15-20 minutes we'll figure out what her point is.

[elleng]

1. Why watch, if she's too complicated for you?

[still_one]

3. lol. That is her style. She tries to give some historical background to whatever her main topic is

[elleng]

5. Exactly, historical background so people should UNDERSTAND!

[malaise]

12. ROFL

[longship]

2. It is called a narrative.

Rachel isn't into sound bytes. Myself, I like her quite a bit, in spite of occasionally repeating herself, which is also one of her schticks.

But I rather like her narratives. It makes for a fleshed out story.

Regards.

[bigwillq]

4. Kind of like this thread.

[GP6971]

6. I say 17 minutes minutes

and I like her lead ins

[Rosa Luxemburg]

7. Something happened?

[GreatCaesarsGhost]

8. She's serving a nice dish on Christie.

[Logical]

9. This is a problem with you and not her! nt

[WhaTHellsgoingonhere]

13. OP's opinion is your problem and that of all the Soup Nazi's here

Dozens of Hillary Soup Nazis, too...hmm, I'll bet you're all the same people.

[LiberalElite]

10. Thank you. I liked Rachel

when she had 10 min. on Olbermann's program but,a whole hour of her drives me crazy. I'd yell at the TV something like: WHAT! WHAT! WHAT HAPPENED? WILL YOU GET TO THE POINT?!?!?!?!!!!???!?!?!!!!! So, I stopped watching.

[WhaTHellsgoingonhere]

14. I look at it like 2 hours of "her", the first being Chris Hayes, who I LOVED on UP!

They need to swap Ed and Hayes to break up the monotony of that 2 hour block.

[WhaTHellsgoingonhere]

11. Lol You attacked a DU sacred cow

[Spazito]

15. LOL...

Sour grapes and weak sauce as a critique, imo.

[Jamastiene]

16. Do you take baseball bats to hornets nests too?

Just curious.