Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 10:59 AM Jul 2015

U.S. Quietly Sided With Tax-Avoiding Companies


(Bloomberg) The Obama administration quietly handed a victory to U.S. companies that avoid taxes by claiming a foreign address, suggesting that virtually all of them are still eligible for government contracts.

The Department of Homeland Security last year endorsed a legal memorandum that argued in part that a 2002 law banning such companies from federal contracts was invalid, according to a copy of the memo obtained by Bloomberg News. Although President Barack Obama later began publicly criticizing the tax maneuvers known as inversions, there’s no sign that he has reversed the department’s decision.

The March 2013 memo was submitted to Homeland Security by one of the country’s largest inverted companies, the manufacturer Ingersoll-Rand Plc. The company argued in part that U.S. trade agreements with foreign governments invalidated the law that would prohibit it from winning federal contracts.

In a written response last year, a Homeland Security lawyer cleared Ingersoll-Rand for government work without explaining his reasoning, saying only that “we do not have reason to disagree” with the company’s argument. While it was known that Ingersoll-Rand received a green light, it hadn’t been reported that the government accepted a line of reasoning that called the whole law into question. ..................(more)

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-06/u-s-sided-with-tax-avoiding-companies-over-contracting-ban



17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
2. The corruption is baked into the system
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 11:39 AM
Jul 2015

i.e., it is institutionalized. Mary Jo White still has her job. WHat does that say?

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
12. The plutocrats own both parties
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 04:07 PM
Jul 2015

and have for quite a while. Anyone who can breathe should have seen this much. Jeez Louise.

cstanleytech

(26,298 posts)
8. No, the problem is still the republicans mainly.
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 02:00 PM
Jul 2015

I suspect if we had a clear majority in both houses and if the republicans had no way to stonewall or block the democrats that things would probably have been alot better for the country, sadly though that didnt happen and we have all seen how spiteful and full of racism and hate that the republican party is full of.

cstanleytech

(26,298 posts)
14. No way that I can prove of course but really saying you dont think they couldnt or wouldnt?
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 04:17 PM
Jul 2015

I mean come on this is the same party that held a gun to the nations head a few years ago over the budget when the president wouldnt back down and they caused a shutdown.

brentspeak

(18,290 posts)
15. The Executive branch is not controlled by Congress
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 08:21 PM
Jul 2015

Anything that the Obama administration does outside legislation is entirely its own doing. Congress, the Republicans, Daffy Duck...are not responsible for any action taken by the administration and its departments.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
4. Only the easy ones to catch and prosecute, like the average worker.
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 12:14 PM
Jul 2015

Corporations are just about (if they are big enough) immune to all the laws that govern the little people.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
5. Didn't it used to be that Rich People didn't deserve more because they own more stuff?
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 12:42 PM
Jul 2015

I'm confused, Rex. It's like the Democrats are trying to out-lick the Republicans in licking the hobnailed boots and stuff.

This Administration forgave the individual tax dodgers and jailed the whistleblower who outted the turds.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x636228

So what if my vote counts just as much as the billionaire's, when the rich guy can afford to get Washington to go along with what's best for him?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
7. When the people don't get cut in on decision making, there's a problem.
Mon Jul 6, 2015, 01:43 PM
Jul 2015

As I'm old, I remember it starting on Nov. 22, 1963. Now, as Frank Zappa observed, "Politics is the entertainment division of the Military Industrial Complex."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. Quietly Sided With T...