Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,075 posts)
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 07:49 PM Jul 2015

Walker puts EPA in the crosshairs

Posted with permission.

Doing the Kochs' dirty work, I presume.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/walker-puts-epa-the-crosshairs?cid=sm_fb_maddow


Walker puts EPA in the crosshairs
07/28/15 11:05 AM—Updated 07/28/15 11:07 AM
By Steve Benen


Republican hostility for the Environmental Protection Agency isn’t exactly new, but it was nevertheless striking to see a leading Republican presidential candidate explain his plans yesterday to effectively eliminate most of the EPA’s responsibilities.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) talked to the conservative Washington Examiner yesterday, and began by talking generally about shifting powers from the federal to the state level on “everything from Medicaid to transportation, workforce development, environmental protection, education.” The Republican presidential hopeful then got more specific:

“All 50 states have the equivalent of an Environmental Protection Agency. In my state, it’s called the Department of Natural Resources. Other states have different names, but again, I’d shift that power and that money out of Washington and basically just leave in place an umbrella organization that really is limited to mediating interstate conflicts over, say, where a body of water or a piece of land goes through multiple states.

“Other than that, I’d leave those requirements and those responsibilities to the state government, where the people making those decisions have to live with them. And I think that’s part of the balance.”

Asked if he’d consider eliminating the environmental agency altogether, the Wisconsin governor added he would “essentially take their responsibilities and send them back to the states.”

If there was a “dispute” between states – your neighboring state allows toxic chemicals to be dumped in rivers, for example, but those rivers reach your state – the EPA in a Walker administration would be able to mediate, if it chooses to.

This probably won’t get as much attention as Donald Trump calling Mexican immigrant “rapists,” but Walker’s vision is every bit as radical. As the AP report on this added:

The EPA currently has the primary responsibility for enforcing many of the nation’s federal environmental laws and regulations, such as the Clean Water Act, and sometimes issues policy or guidance to encourage states to comply with those laws. […].

Lisa Heinzerling, a law professor at Georgetown University and former EPA associate administrator, said Walker’s approach would instead result in 50 different air quality standards and 50 different states conducting basic scientific research to support environmental protection. “If Gov. Walker really does desire meaningful environmental protection in this country, taking power from EPA and giving it to all 50 states is a very silly way to achieve it,” she said. “His idea is a really inefficient, and almost certainly ineffective, way of protecting the environment.”

A Walker campaign spokesperson said the governor would have more details about his plans to overhaul environmental protections in the coming months.

Watch this space.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Walker puts EPA in the crosshairs (Original Post) babylonsister Jul 2015 OP
As if pollution doesn't cross the invisible line in the sand taught_me_patience Jul 2015 #1
he never stops Liberal_in_LA Jul 2015 #2
why should he, he keeps getting elected with these views nt msongs Jul 2015 #5
"send them back to the states" Skittles Jul 2015 #3
Because that's what Charlie and Davey want him to do. JeffHead Jul 2015 #4
Son of a Koch C_U_L8R Jul 2015 #6
I bet we'd then see defunding of state EPAs BadgerKid Jul 2015 #7
In states run by repuke Koch puppets, hifiguy Jul 2015 #9
Yellowstone National Park, brought to you by Pepsi n/t Still In Wisconsin Jul 2015 #11
Evil incarnate. hifiguy Jul 2015 #8
If Walker says he will eliminate the EPA, what he really means is that he will Still In Wisconsin Jul 2015 #10
 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
1. As if pollution doesn't cross the invisible line in the sand
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 07:54 PM
Jul 2015

California should build 10 coal plants 10 feet from the border with Arizona to teach the teapublicans there a thing or two about the EPA.

C_U_L8R

(45,003 posts)
6. Son of a Koch
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 08:05 PM
Jul 2015

Are Republicans hoping crazy Trump makes the rest of the clown car seem reasonable? Don't fall for it.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
9. In states run by repuke Koch puppets,
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 08:33 PM
Jul 2015

I'd say that the chances of that would be prohibitive. Not even Vegas would give odds on it not happening.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
10. If Walker says he will eliminate the EPA, what he really means is that he will
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:58 PM
Jul 2015

eliminate the EPA, NEA, NSF, NIH, DOE. and NASA. Everything but the DOD.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Walker puts EPA in the cr...