Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMany Republican Polls Are Measuring a Unicorn Electorate
For the GOP this year, the polls are more important than everand they're positing an electorate that never existed.Jul 29, 2015 5:01 AM EDT
Ken Goldstein
Recent elections around the world have not been kind to pollsters. In contests in Israel and Britain, and in a referendum in Scotland, pre-election polls all showed tight races that ended up being, well, not so tight. Although American pollsters have not had to explain errors of such magnitude, there were some danger signs in the last two elections in the United States, with some pollsters doing much better than others. On average, pre-election polls underestimated the magnitude of Obamas victory in 2012 and of Republican victories in the 2014 midterms. Theres a variety of possible culprits for these discrepancies. One clearly is tied to the challenge in correctly measuring both the size and the composition of the electorate. Theres some evidence that the polls that underestimated Obamas margin in 2012 erred by underestimating the non-white and Democratic share of the electorate. The problem in 2014, on the other hand, was a kind of mirror image. Many polls erred by counting drop-off votersindividuals who voted in presidential elections, but not in midtermswho happen to be more Democratic.
In an article earlier in the week, I discussed whether Iowa and New Hampshire polls were getting the electorate right. Given the prominence and importance of national primary polls in the Republican contest for deciding who is in and who is out of the first GOP presidential debate, and also creating the self-fulfilling impression of momentum, are these national polls getting the who votes question right? Are they correctly gauging the size and composition of their supposed target population, the Republican primary electorate?
The first problem with trying to measure the attitudes of a target population of the national Republican primary electorate is that such an electorate does not actually exist in the quite the same way that other electorates do. The presidential nominating process is a dynamic one, with primaries and caucuses that could theoretically play out over a five-month period. The size and shape of the electorate in each state will be determined by whether the race is still competitive when it reaches a particular state and by the number of candidates still running. Put another way, probably only Republican caucus goers in Iowa and, perhaps, primary voters in New Hampshire, will have the chance to choose between the current crop of candidates. And thats making the outlandish assumption that none of the candidates drop out in the next few months.
What percentage of registered votes or how many people do these surveys assume will take part in the GOP nominating process? Lets look at the recent Fox News poll. The survey sampled 1,019 registered voters and was conducted by a Republican firm, Shaw and Company, and a Democratic one, Anderson Robinson Research, using high-quality methods such as live interviewers and a standard dual frame design including both landline and cell phones. The results on a variety of questions such as whether voters approve of President Obamas job performance are perfectly in line with all the other public polls that have recently been released.
more...
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-29/many-gop-polls-are-measuring-a-unicorn-electorate
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 632 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Many Republican Polls Are Measuring a Unicorn Electorate (Original Post)
Purveyor
Jul 2015
OP
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)1. I'm curious how they are dealing with the current phenomenon...
of people not answering their phones. How does this skew the sample?
With near-universal caller ID, I keep hearing that people no longer have to pick up the phone to see if the call is important and many simply won't answer if they don't recognize the number.
Hayduke Bomgarte
(1,965 posts)3. "simply won't answer if they don't recognize the number"
That's us alright... As an added bonus those callers get to hear our fax machine pick up after 4 rings.
Gothmog
(145,079 posts)2. The Demographic trends are not favorable to the GOP