Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For starters, the Commander in Chief (Original Post) malaise Oct 2015 OP
sorry but obama is not going to resign nt msongs Oct 2015 #1
Obama makes all these decisions? HereSince1628 Oct 2015 #5
Obama is the Commander in Chief. cwydro Oct 2015 #6
please provide a link. spanone Oct 2015 #7
I heard this news the morning after, and I heard it on NBC. cwydro Oct 2015 #8
He was notified about the location of the hospital DURING the bombing,and he allowed it to continue spanone Oct 2015 #9
I don't need to look it up because I know it is true. cwydro Oct 2015 #10
Well, I tried looking up these stories and I couldn't find reference to Obama having knowledge renegade000 Oct 2015 #19
The poster obviously believes Obama is in on every one of the thousands of sorties....why are you Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #29
If you "know" it's true Andy823 Oct 2015 #20
Put up or shut up. nt Adrahil Oct 2015 #22
I doubt that big time malaise Oct 2015 #11
Per the New York Times and CNN (among others): cwydro Oct 2015 #12
Google shows nothing of the sort ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #13
Obama is the HEAD of the administration. KamaAina Oct 2015 #15
He is also the Commander in Chief. cwydro Oct 2015 #21
Moving goal posts much? Adrahil Oct 2015 #23
Can I have him impeached because my local armory plays its stereo too loud? Orrex Oct 2015 #49
Some bush implant. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2015 #2
That was my first thought but you know malaise Oct 2015 #3
He did at that, sadly. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2015 #4
What if the orders weren't to strike a hospital? ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #14
Now Now don't be bringing a dash of realism into hysteria Lee-Lee Oct 2015 #16
Law school tends to snuff any desire to join a lynch mob. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #18
Um, what? cwydro Oct 2015 #34
When one graduates from law school, one is a lawyer, yes. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #42
One has to pass the bar exam, correct? cwydro Oct 2015 #45
To be an ATTORNEY, one must do so, yes. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #46
Mm. cwydro Oct 2015 #47
Then why did you ask? ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #48
The hospital had given its coordinates to the U.S. military to keep from being bombed. former9thward Oct 2015 #41
They say they did, certainly. ColesCountyDem Oct 2015 #43
So Doctors Without Borders is lying? former9thward Oct 2015 #44
Spoilsport. This is big reason why people don't like you Democrats. :) Hortensis Oct 2015 #33
"you Democrats"? nt bemildred Oct 2015 #36
Yes, as in "you Democrats." Don't you know that's a dirty word to some here? :) Hortensis Oct 2015 #37
So what are you if you aren't a Democrat? bemildred Oct 2015 #38
It was a joke, Bemildred, apparently a bad one. Hortensis Oct 2015 #39
Good to know thanks. nt bemildred Oct 2015 #40
We don't want your reason here.... Adrahil Oct 2015 #24
The U.S. military was repeatedly apprised ot the exact GPS coordinates and Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #25
so, you think they can call a "military official" and ... Adrahil Oct 2015 #27
Was the hospital clearly marked with a huge red cross or red crescent? MH1 Oct 2015 #30
Thank you. cwydro Oct 2015 #35
Because the U.S. military is aware that those coordinates are a hospital. Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #26
The coordinates were known to the American army long long ago. They did not check? Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #31
Fire? They don't fire anybody. Just like they don't prosecute anybody. liberal_at_heart Oct 2015 #17
dont get all sanctimonious questionseverything Oct 2015 #28
sometimes they do DustyJoe Oct 2015 #32
 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
6. Obama is the Commander in Chief.
Sun Oct 4, 2015, 03:33 PM
Oct 2015

He was notified about the location of the hospital DURING the bombing, and he allowed it to continue.

I regretted my vote for him years ago, and I regret it even more now.

Very sad.

The Nobel Peace prize? What a joke.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
8. I heard this news the morning after, and I heard it on NBC.
Sun Oct 4, 2015, 04:03 PM
Oct 2015

If you don't believe me, feel free to search CNN or anywhere else.

It's also in today's New York Times and my local newspaper.

It's sickening and I'm ashamed of my country. The same shame I felt when Bush/Cheney were the war criminals in chief.

spanone

(135,846 posts)
9. He was notified about the location of the hospital DURING the bombing,and he allowed it to continue
Sun Oct 4, 2015, 04:09 PM
Oct 2015

that is YOUR claim....that the President KNEW it was happening and allowed it to continue.

YOU look it up.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
10. I don't need to look it up because I know it is true.
Sun Oct 4, 2015, 04:45 PM
Oct 2015

You obviously want to deny the truth.

There is even a link in another thread in this forum about this very thing.

He KNEW. He allowed the bombing to continue for 30 minutes AFTER being notified. He's a war criminal imo.

It's on the front page of today's New York Times. It's on every major news outlet.

This cowardly, criminal act has been condemned by the international Red Cross and numerous other organizations.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but it HAPPENED. Obama is the Commander in Chief and HE is responsible.

Go hide your head in the sand if that helps you, but it won't change a thing.

renegade000

(2,301 posts)
19. Well, I tried looking up these stories and I couldn't find reference to Obama having knowledge
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 03:03 PM
Oct 2015

It's a pretty incredible claim to begin with. You seriously think that Obama is just sitting there all day micromanaging military operations in Afghanistan?

This is about as silly as claims that Putin intentionally shot down that airliner over Ukraine.

A serious question: what is the hypothetical purpose of bombing a MSF hospital? What strategic aims does that advance?

As far as I can see it: absolutely none. In fact, it sets the US back. It's a huge embarrassment. It's a war crime.

Much like the MH17 incident was a huge embarrassment for Russia.

Why can't things that look like horrible--and yes, criminal -- fuck-ups by people on the ground just be that? Why must they be conspiracies at the highest levels of power? I mean it's not as if this excuses the people who perpetrated the crime. But perhaps you don't find it satisfying unless it goes all the way up?

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
29. The poster obviously believes Obama is in on every one of the thousands of sorties....why are you
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 06:08 PM
Oct 2015

introducing logic into fantasy beliefs?

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
12. Per the New York Times and CNN (among others):
Sun Oct 4, 2015, 04:50 PM
Oct 2015

The administration was notified during the bombing.

Obama is the administration, is he not?

Obama is the Commander in Chief, and if he doesn't know what's going on, well he sure as hell should.

He's either completely incompetent or a war criminal. Sadly, I think it's both.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
13. Google shows nothing of the sort
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 02:26 PM
Oct 2015
https://www.google.com/search?q=obama+knew+hospital+bombing&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

What Google does show is that the hospital staff allegedly made some telephone calls to contacts in Afghanistan and Washington DC. Nowhere is there a story about this information being relayed to the White House-- nowhere.
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
15. Obama is the HEAD of the administration.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 02:45 PM
Oct 2015

The notification may not have made it to the Oval Office.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
21. He is also the Commander in Chief.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 04:24 PM
Oct 2015

But I guess only Truman believed that the buck stopped at that desk.

Obama will pretend he knew nothing about it. No surprise there.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
23. Moving goal posts much?
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 05:38 PM
Oct 2015

First you fallaciously assert that the President personally knew a hospital was being bombed and allowed it to continue, and now you assert he is personally responsible becuase he is the C in C. I hate to break it to you, sunshine, but the U.S. Military is very large. As is the U.S. Administration. Someone certainly screwed up here, but Obama is not personally responsible for every fuck up that happens.

I swear to Jeebus....

Orrex

(63,216 posts)
49. Can I have him impeached because my local armory plays its stereo too loud?
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:39 AM
Oct 2015

Exactly how involved in each action and real-time decision to you think the Commander in Chief is?

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
14. What if the orders weren't to strike a hospital?
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 02:28 PM
Oct 2015

What if the orders were, rather, to hit a target whose coordinates the Afghan army gave you, saying it was a building then Taliban were using to fire on them?

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
16. Now Now don't be bringing a dash of realism into hysteria
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 02:47 PM
Oct 2015

That won't sit well with those demanding heads roll with no real idea what happened.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
42. When one graduates from law school, one is a lawyer, yes.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 09:00 PM
Oct 2015

Drake University Law School, class of '82.

I'm not an attorney, however, since I don't hold a license.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
45. One has to pass the bar exam, correct?
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:18 AM
Oct 2015

I believe there are also background checks and other qualifiers.

I thought I saw a post from you some time ago saying you had worked in a call center, but were currently unemployed.

Perhaps I have you mixed up with someone else.

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
46. To be an ATTORNEY, one must do so, yes.
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 07:22 AM
Oct 2015
Practice and degree are separate things. All 'attorneys at law' are lawyers, but not all lawyers are 'attorneys at law'. Licensure requires passing the bar exam; graduation with a J.D. does not.

former9thward

(32,028 posts)
41. The hospital had given its coordinates to the U.S. military to keep from being bombed.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 08:57 PM
Oct 2015

I guess that note went into the garbage can. Did they teach that at your law school?

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
43. They say they did, certainly.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 09:01 PM
Oct 2015

Do you have proof? You're missing the point, which is that a rush to judgment is just stupid.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
37. Yes, as in "you Democrats." Don't you know that's a dirty word to some here? :)
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 07:00 PM
Oct 2015

The "If you're not with us, you're against us" crowd.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
39. It was a joke, Bemildred, apparently a bad one.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 07:21 PM
Oct 2015

Of course I'm a Democrat with or without the bernista slur on the party label.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
24. We don't want your reason here....
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 05:40 PM
Oct 2015

I said yesterday that this was likely the results of faulty info from the Afghans. Now, that's not an excuse. We need to do a better job of vetting targets, and not just strike whatever they tell us to.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
25. The U.S. military was repeatedly apprised ot the exact GPS coordinates and
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 05:56 PM
Oct 2015

while the bombing had started Doctors Without Frontiers phoned the U.S. military to call off the strikes. Our military did not and continued bombing for an half hour.

To begin with, the organization had repeatedly advised the U.S. military of the exact GPS coordinates of the hospital. They did so most recently on September 29, just five days before the strike. Beyond that, MSF personnel at the facility “frantically” called U.S. military officials during the strike to advise them that the hospital was being hit and to plead with them to stop, but the strikes continued in a “sustained” manner for 30 more minutes.


https://theintercept.com/2015/10/05/the-radically-changing-story-of-the-u-s-airstrike-on-afghan-hospital-from-mistake-to-justification/
 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
27. so, you think they can call a "military official" and ...
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 06:00 PM
Oct 2015

...that means the pilot of a gunship knows he's hitting amprotected target? You are optimist. Just because you talk to some JO in an HQ simehwere does not mean you are talking to the people in direct contact with forces that are engaged.

In fact, I would say that is something that needs to be improved.... A direct hotline to folks coordinating airstrikes.

I do not believe, without further evidence, that U.S? Forces were deliberately striking a protected target. If they were, someone should be court martialed.

MH1

(17,600 posts)
30. Was the hospital clearly marked with a huge red cross or red crescent?
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 06:09 PM
Oct 2015

Maybe I've watched too many WWII movies (actually I haven't watched many) but I thought that medical facilities were supposed to be clearly identified as such, using one of those two universally recognized markings.

IF the hospital was marked, then shouldn't the pilot know that an order to bomb that building was an illegal order and he wasn't bound to follow it?

I don't want to "blame the victim" here. I have been a strong supporter of MSF for years. But this missing piece has been bugging me. If the building was marked, WHY did the pilot continue bombing it? If it wasn't marked, why wasn't it?

Just putting this here because you seem to have read a lot about this, maybe you have seen this question answered?

Or is the idea that a hospital is clearly marked, an antiquated notion?

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
26. Because the U.S. military is aware that those coordinates are a hospital.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 05:57 PM
Oct 2015
To begin with, the organization had repeatedly advised the U.S. military of the exact GPS coordinates of the hospital. They did so most recently on September 29, just five days before the strike. Beyond that, MSF personnel at the facility “frantically” called U.S. military officials during the strike to advise them that the hospital was being hit and to plead with them to stop, but the strikes continued in a “sustained” manner for 30 more minutes.


https://theintercept.com/2015/10/05/the-radically-changing-story-of-the-u-s-airstrike-on-afghan-hospital-from-mistake-to-justification/

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
31. The coordinates were known to the American army long long ago. They did not check?
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 06:10 PM
Oct 2015

Criminal negligence causing mass death is no better than deliberate murder and maybe both sides are to blame?

Trying to pin this on the Afghans means there is a blame game going in now for this massive and completely criminal act.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
17. Fire? They don't fire anybody. Just like they don't prosecute anybody.
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 02:48 PM
Oct 2015

If you work for the government you pretty much have diplomatic immunity.

DustyJoe

(849 posts)
32. sometimes they do
Tue Oct 6, 2015, 06:18 PM
Oct 2015

They fired the soldier that pushed down and punched the afghan official that had raped a young boy. Seems US military are not to intrude on afghan custom of homosexual pedophilic rape of children.

Way past time to get our men and women out of that prehistoric hellhole of allu-snackbar decadent, brutal murdering rapists. Let them stew in their traditions and culture by themselves.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For starters, the Command...