General Discussion

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts) Fri Nov 13, 2015, 08:02 AM Nov 2015

On Good Morning America today - Romney

"could this man be making a comeback?" Please proceed, Gov. I can't wait to vote against you again.

CLARIFICATION - I don't think they're having Romney on - just talking about him.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

On Good Morning America today - Romney (Original Post) LiberalElite Nov 2015 OP

Are they suggesting that he may be Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2015 #1

I ended up hitting the mute LiberalElite Nov 2015 #2

They can't do much worse I suppose Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2015 #3

Ahhhhhh, Romney. From "anybody but Mitt" to... JHB Nov 2015 #4

Been saying it for months LynnTTT Nov 2015 #5

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,414 posts)

1. Are they suggesting that he may be

Reply to LiberalElite (Original post)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 08:25 AM

Nov 2015

The next "great white hope" for the GOP, which currently has no sane/credible candidates at present- not that he is much better of course?

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)

2. I ended up hitting the mute

Reply to Proud Liberal Dem (Reply #1)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 08:49 AM

Nov 2015

and getting ready for work. They're clearly at the Try Anyone phase - but then they've been that that one from the start.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,414 posts)

3. They can't do much worse I suppose

Reply to LiberalElite (Reply #2)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 08:56 AM

Nov 2015

n/t

JHB

(37,161 posts)

4. Ahhhhhh, Romney. From "anybody but Mitt" to...

Reply to LiberalElite (Original post)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 09:09 AM

Nov 2015

..."none of the above, so Mitt".

A better Amercia awaits.

LynnTTT

(362 posts)

5. Been saying it for months

Reply to LiberalElite (Original post)

Fri Nov 13, 2015, 09:29 AM

Nov 2015

The GOP will not allow Trump/Carson to be the nominee. Either they'll pull Romney back, or somehow find a way to nominate someone else at the convention. Maybe Rubio will be told to start being more centrist over the next few months,. This could be exciting.

Reply to this discussion