Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kali

(55,019 posts)
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:00 PM Dec 2015

I am a little behind on the news, questions about the SB shootings

what happened/who was the third person that was supposedly apprehended when the shoot-out at the vehicle happened?

was Farook handcuffed like one photo seems to show? what was the explanation for that?

this thing is weird. and now just saw the story about the former neighbor/friend that bought some of the guns.

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am a little behind on the news, questions about the SB shootings (Original Post) Kali Dec 2015 OP
Lol darkangel218 Dec 2015 #1
and that is funny? Kali Dec 2015 #2
Wonder what's on tap tonight? Texasgal Dec 2015 #5
Don't know, why don't you tell me? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #7
Cheap Vodka again? Texasgal Dec 2015 #9
I don't drink liquor, so again, is that what you're having? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #11
doubt that one could handle vodka Kali Dec 2015 #17
"That one" darkangel218 Dec 2015 #20
If you think that he was cuffed before being shot, yes. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #6
did I say that? Kali Dec 2015 #16
What else did you mean by it then? darkangel218 Dec 2015 #18
try reading the thread Kali Dec 2015 #21
OK, then I'm happy to enlighten you that they do cuff suspects after taking them down. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #23
no links, just your assertion? LOL Kali Dec 2015 #26
Whatever fits you. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #28
it is normal procedure to cuff a suspect TorchTheWitch Dec 2015 #48
thanks Kali Dec 2015 #49
you're very welcome TorchTheWitch Dec 2015 #50
You're assuming things never said tammywammy Dec 2015 #22
She asked a question, I answered. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #24
WTF? Lol?? Squinch Dec 2015 #30
I agree, this story is a bit weird. Texasgal Dec 2015 #3
yeah the new info just seems to get stranger Kali Dec 2015 #12
True. Texasgal Dec 2015 #19
The guy who checked into the mental onecaliberal Dec 2015 #43
they got a couple of the weapons from a gun humping piece of SHIT neighbor Skittles Dec 2015 #4
skittles! Kali Dec 2015 #8
I think it needs to be researched why there are so many COWARDS Skittles Dec 2015 #15
. Squinch Dec 2015 #31
who then checked himself into a mental hospital 840high Dec 2015 #35
something a LOT of gun humpers need to do Skittles Dec 2015 #39
think this one is just avoiding the FBi. 840high Dec 2015 #45
A list of weird stuff Nevernose Dec 2015 #10
me either, CT and woo are not my thing at all Kali Dec 2015 #14
K&R! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #13
Your laughing about questions regarding a mass shooting is unbecoming. tammywammy Dec 2015 #25
No, I'm laughing about the CT questions. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #27
I don't see any CT questions, just questions. tammywammy Dec 2015 #29
Pay no mind to the happy hour queen. Texasgal Dec 2015 #32
You keep talking about "happy hours" darkangel218 Dec 2015 #37
I never said you know my Facebook. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #33
.... tammywammy Dec 2015 #36
I was referring to the CT which was mentioned ahead. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #38
this from someone who posts about the spirits of dead right wingers, UFOs, and mutant dolphins Kali Dec 2015 #40
Yup, and you think GMOs are safe. darkangel218 Dec 2015 #41
as usual, an overly simplistic mistatement of my position Kali Dec 2015 #46
You do the same! darkangel218 Dec 2015 #47
for those that might be following the idiotic exchange above (or ignoring it, but curious) Kali Dec 2015 #34
Thank you. Texasgal Dec 2015 #42
yeah, I have seen some bad situations with animals before Kali Dec 2015 #44
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
1. Lol
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:08 PM
Dec 2015

No he wasn't "handcuffed" and then shot .If he was handcuffed at all it was after. It's standard procedure

Kali

(55,019 posts)
16. did I say that?
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:21 PM
Dec 2015

you are displaying your reading comprehension and conclusion-jumping problems again.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
18. What else did you mean by it then?
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:23 PM
Dec 2015

Assuming you know that cuffing a suspect after being taken down is normal procedure.

Kali

(55,019 posts)
21. try reading the thread
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:29 PM
Dec 2015

and no, I don't know that is normal procedure.

none of the recent big news stories of cop shootings that I have seen had the dead person cuffed.

do you have any evidence or is it just your "law enforcement" ( ) background?

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
23. OK, then I'm happy to enlighten you that they do cuff suspects after taking them down.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:31 PM
Dec 2015

As standard procedure.

YW.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
48. it is normal procedure to cuff a suspect
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 10:21 PM
Dec 2015

after they've been shot when that suspect has demonstrated violence toward police officers or anyone else. This is so that it is not assumed they are down and out and be able to take out a weapon or pick up and shoot the one that fell when they did, detonate a bomb, etc. It makes sense, and is not only for the safety of the officers but anyone else in the vicinity.

In this particular case, as I understand it Farook did not perish immediately and was still breathing when removed from the vehicle and cuffed. Not that it matters whether he still kicking and screaming or had his entire head shot off his shoulders, but there are procedures for a reason. Frankly, after someone had just shot at me, I'd WANT to make damn well sure they couldn't do any more violence. I can't even begin to imagine what it would be like to have to stay calm, cool and collected after first discovering that such a heinous act occurred but to be shot at by the perpetrators as they tried to escape and do who knows what other despicable acts. I honestly don't know if I could just cuff the perp and not lose it and kick their head off their neck in fury and terror. I guess that's why I wouldn't do a cop's job for anything.

As for the "third suspect" as it turned out there wasn't one though it took quite some time to discover this. Apparently, there was someone so freaked out by all the shooting that they went running off hopping neighbors' fences in the area and traveling through yards to get away from the scene. Probably more than one person called 911 with the assumption (and rightly so) that this person was part of the crime. As I understand it, at least in the beginning, it was being reported that someone in the building or in the room where the murderers were shooting that it was three people doing it which certainly would have added to the confusion of how many perps there were. In the end it turned out to be only two murderers that carried out this horrific act, but it took quite some time for that to become clear.

And now I can't remember what your other questions were, and anyway, I need to go pee.

Kali

(55,019 posts)
49. thanks
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 10:40 PM
Dec 2015

I found the info on cuffing and of course it makes sense. (though I still wonder about possible explosives on the bodies as a general question)

I pretty much had that stuff on the third person from the press conferences that evening. The sheriff or police chief (the bald guy) was clear that they did not know if it was a suspect or a bystander, but never saw anything conclusive about it after that.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
50. you're very welcome
Mon Dec 7, 2015, 12:56 AM
Dec 2015

As to possible explosives on the bodies, well, this is just one more thing that makes police work hazardous. They need to check for concealed weapons and explosive devices, and the only safe way to do that is to make sure the first thing they do with the perp is cuff them so they can't draw a weapon or detonate an explosive device.

Though it may seem silly to cuff a suspect when they're very obviously dead one of the reasons to always follow procedure is so that there is never a situation where wrong decisions are made since wrongly assuming the suspect is absolutely dead and they aren't and they detonate an explosive or manage to shoot or stab you or someone else... well, that's obviously a huge problem. Another reason is what is called "muscle memory". In such a situation humans naturally feel tremendous fear, anger, shock, panic, etc., and to still be able to function appropriately, the drilled procedure kicks in so that your body will just automatically do what it has been drilled to do in X circumstance.

I've known about muscle memory since my early years in ballet... it was a term meaning that regardless of how paralyzed with stage fright you may be the body remembers the steps. I imagine all performers that have difficulty with stage fright know about muscle memory. Ever found yourself singing a song you've sung scads of time and realize you're in the third verse but your mind had been wandering yet you know you sang all the right words in the right tune? That's muscle memory. I watched a segment I think the day after the attacks about what to do in the event of a shooting situation, and they mentioned muscle memory... if you drill enough times, should it actually ever occur your body will just remember what you need to do even though studies show that in terrifying situations 80% of people freeze, and in a shooter situation freezing even for just a few seconds can mean the difference of surviving or not.

God, what is the country coming to when we need to drill for shooter situations like fire drills. Ugh.

Once again we can thank the sound bite media for dropping the ball on following up on the third suspect story... once they got Farook's name they went flying off in that direction finding it far more important to tell us all about the toys of the baby in the apartment they should never have been in rather than following up on the suspected third shooter. Since I don't watch the tv and get all my info from the 'net I had to dig to find out the third suspect didn't exist, and it's still rather murky about how and why this third person was suspected and searched for. Every day the media in this country gets worse, but I've been fuming over the lack of follow up on stories for decades particularly with my local news.

Gah, I just realized how late it had gotten and I have to be up at the crack of before dawn.

Night.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
22. You're assuming things never said
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:30 PM
Dec 2015

It reads to me that Kali did not think it was SOP to have him handcuffed.

For all your complaining about Kali, you sure aren't doing yourself any favors here.

Texasgal

(17,047 posts)
3. I agree, this story is a bit weird.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:11 PM
Dec 2015

From what I understand Farook was handcuffed AFTER being shot I assume to make sure he was no longer a threat?

The third shooter was an eye witness account that has not been verified fully.

The dude that checked himself in mental facility has me perplexed as well.

This is not the gospel, just from what I gather. Very weird story all the way around.

Kali

(55,019 posts)
12. yeah the new info just seems to get stranger
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:16 PM
Dec 2015

with each article.

so he WAS indeed cuffed? I wasn't even sure about the image, the way the internet is these days.

the guy was pretty dead looking so I would think getting near a possibly booby trapped corpse to hand cuff it would be riskier than just leaving it...

Texasgal

(17,047 posts)
19. True.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:24 PM
Dec 2015

I am not sure if this was immediate cuffing or not. And yes, you are right about photos and the net. I'm not sure we'll ever get the official story. The photo I saw sure looked like a cuffed person.. but then again.. Who knows?

The thing that get's me is this weird back and forth about this being a terrorist act or workplace violence. They had rounds and rounds of amo along with vests and pipe bombs!! Dropping the kid off, renting a vehicle, wearing masks. Just seems odd that this would be a workplace violence issue.

onecaliberal

(32,898 posts)
43. The guy who checked into the mental
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 10:05 PM
Dec 2015

Hospital is a former neighbor and good friend of male shooter and it is believe he sold the male shooter the guns.

Skittles

(153,193 posts)
15. I think it needs to be researched why there are so many COWARDS
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:19 PM
Dec 2015

and why America insists on kowtowing to those fucking COWARDS

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
10. A list of weird stuff
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:15 PM
Dec 2015

Which I originally posted to a different thread:

Let me preface this by saying that I'm not a conspiracy theorist, nor am I espousing any theories.

Multiple witnesses reported three shooters (other posters are correct in saying how terrible eyewitness ID is).
The wife's "allegiance to ISIS? Not made on her regular FB account, but one that was pseudonymous and no one else knew about.
The post was deleted, which makes it, at the very least, pretty shitty terrorism.
There were pipe bombs found at the house, but none were ever used. Is it normal for terrorists to build bombs they're not planning on using?
No major organizations took believable credit.
They only killed the husband's coworkers.
They killed them within an hour of him arguing with the cowothers.

Again: not espousing CTs, just saying its unusual.

Kali

(55,019 posts)
14. me either, CT and woo are not my thing at all
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:19 PM
Dec 2015

but like you said - some strange details coming out of this

last I was following intently, they had this third person in hand, not sure if they were a bystander, an accomplice or what. but then I never saw any follow up about it.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
25. Your laughing about questions regarding a mass shooting is unbecoming.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:31 PM
Dec 2015

Not everyone can watch/listen/read the news 24/7.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
27. No, I'm laughing about the CT questions.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:34 PM
Dec 2015

(My FB was flooded by these today.)

But you already knew that.



tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
29. I don't see any CT questions, just questions.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:37 PM
Dec 2015

I have no idea what your FB feed looks like, I'm neither your friend nor would I want to be.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
33. I never said you know my Facebook.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:43 PM
Dec 2015

The CT such as a "third shooter", and Farook cuffed ( which is normal standard procedure, if that even happened)..

And about the " friends" thing, trust me, the feeling is mutual

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
36. ....
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:47 PM
Dec 2015
My FB was flooded by these today.

But you already knew that.


I'm only responding to your statement. "But you already knew that," immediately follows a statement about your FB feed.

The day of the shooting there was discussion about a third shooter and questions on why a dead person would be cuffed all seem like normal questions from someone that's admitted they haven't kept up with the news.

Kali

(55,019 posts)
40. this from someone who posts about the spirits of dead right wingers, UFOs, and mutant dolphins
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:55 PM
Dec 2015



sorry, I don't spend all day on FB and I sure as hell don't stalk you on there like you did to me.

Kali

(55,019 posts)
34. for those that might be following the idiotic exchange above (or ignoring it, but curious)
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:45 PM
Dec 2015

I found this quoted at this page - http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2014/08/why-cops-handcuff-dead-people.html

Lesson 8: Handcuff all downed suspects. Some officers might feel that it is not nice to handcuff suspects that have been shot, and others might believe that it is unnecessary to cuff all suspects because some are “obviously” dead. Counted among the suspects shot during incidents that officers reported during the VALOR interviews were some who appeared to be dead—for example, from multiple rifle rounds to the head—but who were still alive. As noted in the introduction, some human beings have a remarkable capacity to survive gunshot wounds. Fortunately, none of the thoughtdead offenders managed to injure any officers interviewed, but the fact that they were still alive meant that they maintained the capacity to do so. The capacity of downed suspects is hindered substantially when they are cuffed. No matter how severely injured they might be, therefore, all downed suspects should be handcuffed.


pretty much all you had to do there, dear

Texasgal

(17,047 posts)
42. Thank you.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 10:01 PM
Dec 2015

Good information.

This was kind of my thought in the beginning, they handcuffed him to make sure he was no longer a threat.

Still weird things with this story though.

Kali

(55,019 posts)
44. yeah, I have seen some bad situations with animals before
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 10:08 PM
Dec 2015

so I can understand that in general, but these people may have - did? - have explosives so I wonder if there are different protocols now that suicide bombings are "in the universe" and a strong possibility in a potential terror type attack.

although at the time I suppose the police didn't really know much of anything about these people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am a little behind on t...