Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tab

(11,093 posts)
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 02:37 PM Dec 2015

Angela Merkel - WTF?

Did not see this coming.


(CNN)In a year in which terrorism, refugees and protests of many stripes dominated headlines, Time magazine tapped German Chancellor Angela Merkel as its Person of the Year.

In announcing the winner on NBC's "Today Show" Wednesday, Time Managing Editor Nancy Gibbs pointed to Merkel's handling of a vast array of issues -- including the European economic crisis tied to countries such as Greece, the flood of refugees into the continent from the Middle East and Africa and several deadly terrorist attacks in the region.

"No one was tested the way she was," Gibbs said. "...She has stepped up in a way that was uncharacteristic, even for her."

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/09/europe/time-person-of-the-year-merkel/
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Angela Merkel - WTF? (Original Post) Tab Dec 2015 OP
I know, right. Android3.14 Dec 2015 #1
+1 valerief Dec 2015 #3
holy mackerel, Sanders has had next to no impact worldwide, to say they "censor" Sanders KittyWampus Dec 2015 #29
How were the finalists chosen? nt G_j Dec 2015 #35
Safe choice. 840high Dec 2015 #2
I don't think it's a good choice Renew Deal Dec 2015 #4
Me neither Yorktown Dec 2015 #27
I think it's a good choice. She sets a great example for the world. mainer Dec 2015 #5
I agree. trotsky Dec 2015 #6
I agree. Tipperary Dec 2015 #8
Well said, mainer. n/t pampango Dec 2015 #18
It's a good choice, but an odd picture of her on the cover. Johonny Dec 2015 #20
Oh, yes. That's a vastly important point. Her looks. PeaceNikki Dec 2015 #23
On the cover? Johonny Dec 2015 #24
She represennts austrity betterdemsonly Dec 2015 #25
I'm just glad neither Hillary nor Bernie got it. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2015 #7
I kind of wish the choice wasn't a politician. bigwillq Dec 2015 #9
Very good point. nt Tipperary Dec 2015 #15
It might be something was owed to her. lpbk2713 Dec 2015 #10
worst president ever saturnsring Dec 2015 #11
Chimpy never failed to embarrass the entire country hifiguy Dec 2015 #12
... and one video Dave used to like to play often. lpbk2713 Dec 2015 #14
He had a thing for her flamingdem Dec 2015 #16
Maybe if MSNBS and other media were less "All Trump, All the Time" Retrograde Dec 2015 #13
There is no "world out there" according to the M$M hifiguy Dec 2015 #17
+1 Person 2713 Dec 2015 #33
In terms of world impact, it was her, Putin or al-Baghdadi muriel_volestrangler Dec 2015 #19
Merkel being the lesser of evils .. ananda Dec 2015 #22
the US is not the center of the world JI7 Dec 2015 #21
Of coarse neoliberals at Time love her. betterdemsonly Dec 2015 #26
Good choice, she refused to bend to pressure. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #28
What difference does it make? Practically no one reads Time anymore. virgogal Dec 2015 #30
And you haven't either, and I may not either, but it's the thought that counts Tab Dec 2015 #31
If not Merkel it was going to be Trump... Blue_Tires Dec 2015 #32
Were I to actually give a damn, I would say that Merkel is a fine choice. nt ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #34
She's not even Murican. Time magazine traitors! Person 2713 Dec 2015 #36
 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
1. I know, right.
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 03:03 PM
Dec 2015

I can understand that they have to censor Sanders because of the threat he represents to the corporate interests, but why pick Merkel? Maybe it was the choice that would offend the least number of wealthy people.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
29. holy mackerel, Sanders has had next to no impact worldwide, to say they "censor" Sanders
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 01:36 PM
Dec 2015

is really kind of silly. He wasn't even a finalist.

mainer

(12,028 posts)
5. I think it's a good choice. She sets a great example for the world.
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 03:20 PM
Dec 2015

Tolerance and charity toward refugees. How can we discount that?

Johonny

(20,880 posts)
20. It's a good choice, but an odd picture of her on the cover.
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 07:58 PM
Dec 2015

She comes off looking like Boris Yeltsin. What's with that?

Johonny

(20,880 posts)
24. On the cover?
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 12:21 PM
Dec 2015

Yeah I understand your point in general, but the appearance of the cover of your magazine looks matter. That is one of the worse pictures of her I've ever seen. I have no idea why they did that to her.

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
25. She represennts austrity
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 12:54 PM
Dec 2015

and giving selling on public assets to bankers. She also promoted the war the created the refugees.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
9. I kind of wish the choice wasn't a politician.
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 03:30 PM
Dec 2015

It's kind of their job to be "tested" and "step up".

lpbk2713

(42,766 posts)
10. It might be something was owed to her.
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 03:30 PM
Dec 2015


For being humiliated and groped by the dumbest president ever.





 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
12. Chimpy never failed to embarrass the entire country
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 04:06 PM
Dec 2015

and humanity itself. You posted Exhibit A. Here are a few more.











Retrograde

(10,152 posts)
13. Maybe if MSNBS and other media were less "All Trump, All the Time"
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 05:34 PM
Dec 2015

we'd hear more about Merkel and other world leaders. Or about other things happening in the world: how many people have heard about the recent disastrous flooding in Britain?

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
17. There is no "world out there" according to the M$M
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 05:42 PM
Dec 2015

unless something happens, like Paris, that can be used to help catapult the corporate propaganda of fear. USA! USA!

muriel_volestrangler

(101,355 posts)
19. In terms of world impact, it was her, Putin or al-Baghdadi
Wed Dec 9, 2015, 06:50 PM
Dec 2015

They gave it to Putin in 2007, so they may have thought it was too soon for another. Giving it to the ISIS leader would have been really controversial.

ananda

(28,874 posts)
22. Merkel being the lesser of evils ..
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 10:25 AM
Dec 2015

.. is rather damning with faint praise.

It's like saying my tyrant is better than yours
because she is sometimes benevolent.

But she is the poster-leader for vicious austerity
and neofascist corporate globalism.

Never forget that.

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
26. Of coarse neoliberals at Time love her.
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 12:58 PM
Dec 2015

She has destroyed social security in most of Europe and sold their assets to the banks. Women and minorities that act as enforcers for the bank criminals are always loved by the corporate media.

 

virgogal

(10,178 posts)
30. What difference does it make? Practically no one reads Time anymore.
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 01:54 PM
Dec 2015

The cover will be discussed on-line but the reading of the actual magazine keeps going down.

In other words,virtually no one ever even sees the cover.

Tab

(11,093 posts)
31. And you haven't either, and I may not either, but it's the thought that counts
Thu Dec 10, 2015, 02:00 PM
Dec 2015

And people apparently use it as a touchstone, regardless of whether one might agree with it or not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Angela Merkel - WTF?