E. J. Dionne: The Stakes In The Walker Recall

[babylonsister]

http://www.nationalmemo.com/the-stakes-in-the-walker-recall/

The Stakes In The Walker Recall
May 31st, 2012 12:00 am E. J. Dionne

snip//

Walker is not being challenged because he pursued conservative policies but because Wisconsin has become the most glaring example of a new and genuinely alarming approach to politics on the right. It seeks to use incumbency to alter the rules and tilt the legal and electoral playing field decisively toward the interests of those in power.

The most obvious way of gaming the system is to keep your opponents from voting in the next election. Rigging the electorate is a surefire way of holding on to office. That is exactly what has happened in state after state — Wisconsin is one of them — where GOP legislatures passed new laws on voter identification and registration. They are plainly aimed at making it much more difficult for poorer, younger and minority voters to get or stay on the voter rolls, and to cast ballots when Election Day comes.

Rationalized by claims of extensive voter fraud that are invented out of whole cloth, these measures are discriminatory in their effect and partisan in their purpose. On their own, they are sufficient cause for the electorate to rise up and cry, “Stop!”

But Walker and his allies did more than this in Wisconsin. They also sought to undermine one of the Democratic Party’s main sources of organization. They sharply curtailed collective bargaining by most public employee unions and made it harder for these organizations to maintain themselves over time, notably by requiring an almost endless series of union elections.

snip//

Walker seems to enjoy a slight advantage in the polls, having vastly outspent his foes up to now. Barrett, however, should have enough money to level the competition in the final days. This recall should not have had to happen. But its root cause was not the orneriness of Walker’s opponents but a polarizing brand of conservative politics that most Americans, including many conservatives, have good reason to reject.

http://www.nationalmemo.com/the-stakes-in-the-walker-recall/2/

[Scuba]

1. Dionne nails it, as he often does. Huge K&R.

[kentuck]

2. Right on target...

Walker is very polarizing and is not common throughout the country. Although there are other states that are doing similar tactics or worse.

[HereSince1628]

4. So having a polarizing Gov is the what's at stake of the headline?

I looked right past that. I admit to having had a sense that the lede in that was so well buried that the grave had been camouflaged.

Somehow concern about the elections-have-consequences shove-it-down-their-throats style teahadists politics seemed to be prelude, not postscript.

What's at stake in that? It shouldn't be news to anyone that Americans are about to face a lot more corporate led ram-rodding state legislative majorities and governors either way the WI recalls turn out.

When WI recalls the one state senator needed to break the teahadis trifecta, it will be one lost legislative majority. When Walker is replaced it will be one lost governorship.

Are people outside Wisconsin really so naive that they think losing one governorship or one state legislature will stop the Great Coup D'etat of the Corporate Confederacy?

[Overseas]

3. K&R. Well said.

[malaise]

5. MUST READ

Rec

[hwmnbn]

6. K&R

[FarCenter]

7. The conflict between taxpayers and unions is fundamental and applies to other states

It is largely the result of most union members being public employees now.

[riderinthestorm]

8. Back to the top of GD. Great read. K&R nt