Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:45 PM Jan 2016

There are not 200 armed men holding that building. There are no more than 15

according to multiple accounts from reporters at the scene. Using force to evict them is idiotic. Simply cut power, communications and water. They'll be out of there in a few short days. Then prosecute them to the full extent of the law.

Escalating the situation would serve no positive resolution; only endanger the lives of law enforcement and potentially create martyrs and help these fuckwads.

At this point, these assholes are endangering no one. They don't have hostages.

Personally, I think they're hoping for a confrontation initiated by law enforcement. They obviously are seeking the spotlight. Deny them both.

I've been unpleasantly surprised by the calls here for escalation and violent confrontation to a situation that poses no threat and is obviously counterproductive.

And no, saying this doesn't make me a right wing terrorist sympathizer. It simply reflects my belief that violence is rarely the answer.


http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2016/01/militia_continue_occupation_of.html

263 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There are not 200 armed men holding that building. There are no more than 15 (Original Post) cali Jan 2016 OP
Spot on cali, spot on. GGJohn Jan 2016 #1
Gunners protecting gunners. These are the same racist gun yahoos who drew down Hoyt Jan 2016 #33
And if they refuse to walk out after 2 hours Hoyt? GGJohn Jan 2016 #37
Well GG, what was it you said you did when you got a mission? Surely, there are some more folks Hoyt Jan 2016 #58
Well Hoyt, I was in, you know, an actual war, something you probably know nothing about. GGJohn Jan 2016 #61
You chose to be, and were gung ho about it. But, I agree that was a long time ago. Hoyt Jan 2016 #69
Then we are in agreement. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #71
this area in summer is atrociously hot. cut off water and it would take longer now but they would ca roguevalley Jan 2016 #203
Cut the electricity and the well stops pumping. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #204
"Give them two hours..." I go along with Cali, instead. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #136
Do terrorists get/deserve trials? I basically agree with you, but do find it interesting how the Hoyt Jan 2016 #141
You try to make this into a gun/no gun DU argument and you fail spectacularly. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #152
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #176
What a bald faced lie. GGJohn Jan 2016 #182
Yes. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #161
A non violent (somewhat) eviction method would be to roomtomove Jan 2016 #245
Why am I not surprised RandySF Jan 2016 #183
Bullshit!! GGJohn Jan 2016 #184
Good on you. pangaia Jan 2016 #193
With some here, it'a always about race, GGJohn Jan 2016 #196
yeah sure heaven05 Jan 2016 #213
Whatever dude. GGJohn Jan 2016 #214
yeah, sure heaven05 Jan 2016 #212
So you're for more violence and killing? GGJohn Jan 2016 #215
you're welcome heaven05 Jan 2016 #239
"Their place" should be obscurity. n/t Beartracks Jan 2016 #227
Don't need to do anything violent, just lock them in there and ensure they don't leave snooper2 Jan 2016 #249
Yup, sooner or later, there will be dissent among the "troops". eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #251
My first thought was "Fuck the bastards" but saner thoughts came next. You're right. We don't.. BlueJazz Jan 2016 #2
They are not holed up in a single building passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #117
Ah...I see. I though there was a rather quick solution to this scenario. Now I know the facts,.. BlueJazz Jan 2016 #148
Bring the troops? GGJohn Jan 2016 #150
Yes. Exactly. Exactly what would happen if it were the Black Tigers (or whatever) and they had the BlueJazz Jan 2016 #164
So murder is your thing? GGJohn Jan 2016 #168
I disagree. Most people don't put themselves in a situation such as that. BlueJazz Jan 2016 #174
I am glad that someone in your present emotional state is not be making the decisions. pangaia Jan 2016 #195
Seems like we've tried everything else with the people that continue to vote us into the dirt. BlueJazz Jan 2016 #198
Learning from past experiences, the longer the standoff occurs, Jim Beard Jan 2016 #171
The higher the chance of public support? GGJohn Jan 2016 #172
Well here's something to consider. Cheviteau Jan 2016 #207
I'm not in favor of violence unless it's a very last resort. GGJohn Jan 2016 #208
Actually it tends to go the other way rpannier Jan 2016 #229
What do you suppose the reaction would have been if Stonepounder Jan 2016 #222
it's pretty fucking cold there, just use fire trucks and hoses LOL snooper2 Jan 2016 #250
Possibly the Use of Teargas??? Herman4747 Jan 2016 #254
Sure, that sounds reasonable. BlueJazz Jan 2016 #263
Agreed and well said GummyBearz Jan 2016 #3
Bundy thinks he's Robin Hood, so does his merry band of men. HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #4
you can turn um inside out and wear them another week. KentuckyWoman Jan 2016 #7
Now that was funny! ljm2002 Jan 2016 #90
"Okay men... form up! It's time to change underwear!" cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #113
I believe they are trying to provoke an armed confrontation The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #5
I know it sounds like it passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #119
Thank you. You are sane. oldandhappy Jan 2016 #6
I am amazed at the bloodlust I have seen on this board. demmiblue Jan 2016 #8
They're insulting the rule of law and the civility of our society. Anger isn't surprising. Bucky Jan 2016 #242
I agree with the call for non-violence. Aristus Jan 2016 #9
"cut power, communications and water" jberryhill Jan 2016 #10
I think wells have electric pumps. cali Jan 2016 #11
Have you done much winter camping? jberryhill Jan 2016 #15
If there's snow they can use that. But they'll need food eventually The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #18
There are ample fresh water supplies jberryhill Jan 2016 #19
I tried winter camping once and hated it, but The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #23
One deer can feed a lot of folks jberryhill Jan 2016 #44
Ineed. nt 2naSalit Jan 2016 #83
Not if the cops don't let them leave the building. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #121
The issue might be water that's actually in liquid form. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #56
I would expect a remote HQ to have a propane tank jberryhill Jan 2016 #79
It's not just a small stone cabin passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #127
Propane tanks have to be hooked up to something. davsand Jan 2016 #173
You can't run a generator indoors Travis_0004 Jan 2016 #181
Odds are these guys are also preppers hack89 Jan 2016 #38
I've been winter camping in northern Vermont. cali Jan 2016 #30
How does it sound that way jberryhill Jan 2016 #46
You are forgetting something important rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #70
Are they gonna be able to pump donuts and cheese doodles out of those wells? Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #186
It almost seems as though some want a repeat of Waco, Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #12
Yep. Barricade the roads so they can't run a get any food. Put in a cellphone jammer and LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #13
"so they can't run a get any food" jberryhill Jan 2016 #21
Never can tell. People will pack some food for a certain stay and go through it pretty quick. LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #22
How will they run out of water? jberryhill Jan 2016 #47
They're not? XemaSab Jan 2016 #72
Is that like White Sands? jberryhill Jan 2016 #77
That's going to be really dry snow XemaSab Jan 2016 #84
I would expect there is a sizeable water supply jberryhill Jan 2016 #94
Regardless of what you may think, Eastern Oregon is a desert. Maedhros Jan 2016 #165
There is apparently a large pond on the property jberryhill Jan 2016 #170
There are, indeed, ponds in the desert. Maedhros Jan 2016 #175
There do seem to be facilities they can draw upon starroute Jan 2016 #62
I would assume the entrances are covered by law enforcement. Gore1FL Jan 2016 #105
Good, the authorities can add poaching to the charges. nt dflprincess Jan 2016 #202
totally agree...especially this part... dhill926 Jan 2016 #14
Has this thread been alerted yet? Mika Jan 2016 #16
I wonder if the people who are calling for murdering the idiots in the building understand terrorism NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #17
+1 cali Jan 2016 #32
Agree!!! K&R!!! n/t RKP5637 Jan 2016 #85
^^^. Eleanors38 Jan 2016 #140
Not suprisingly, that happened in the past. Lancero Jan 2016 #218
Law enforcement now has drones with tazers Lorien Jan 2016 #231
Um, we attacked Iraq first Lorien Jan 2016 #232
Read up on Waco and Ruby Ridge. jeff47 Jan 2016 #258
Let them continue to advertise their ignorance JEB Jan 2016 #20
agreed...the calls to violence here are appalling. MindPilot Jan 2016 #24
The better way to treat these idiots is with total humiliation. avebury Jan 2016 #102
Just tow their autos leftyladyfrommo Jan 2016 #125
LOL--I kind of love your idea to rename it as a prison and let them sit there ad infinitum renate Jan 2016 #132
Yeah, it is both a funny & effective idea... Herman4747 Jan 2016 #255
wow, that's a very good point (I'm impressed!). but I wonder... renate Jan 2016 #262
Best idea ever. Just post some guards and they can start serving their time in captivity. The Wielding Truth Jan 2016 #180
And doing nothing will encorage them to do much worse Lorien Jan 2016 #233
They let them go after the Bundy Ranch episode. dogman Jan 2016 #25
Was thinking the same thing. These incidents are like dog whistles on DU LittleBlue Jan 2016 #26
You are level headed. Escalation is what evil people want PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #27
Or... treat them the same why non white Americans get treated? uponit7771 Jan 2016 #28
Why? Do you think that's good? Oh, and Ruby Ridge ring a bell? cali Jan 2016 #34
Which is the correct way to treat people? NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #48
Trump would kill their relatives, world wide wally Jan 2016 #29
Freeze them out. Arrest them when they come out. Throw the book at them. hobbit709 Jan 2016 #31
That will be the plan. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #52
Interesting that you mention FREEZE them out Herman4747 Jan 2016 #256
Shemya Island is currently not being used for much of anything. hobbit709 Jan 2016 #257
I'll bet every one of those idiots blames Tamir Rice for his death Gormy Cuss Jan 2016 #35
Yep Recursion Jan 2016 #36
Good post, I agree davekriss Jan 2016 #39
So, about twice the number that shot up Paris. tabasco Jan 2016 #40
From CNN - Plan is to wait them out Tab Jan 2016 #41
Except that none charged some of these same idiots nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #42
I am white. And I was just saying to my wife... retrowire Jan 2016 #50
Colonialism nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #53
Eric the Folder has moved on. GeorgeGist Jan 2016 #199
This did not even go all the way to the AG nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #220
They'll have to go back to work when their PTO runs out. ileus Jan 2016 #43
I see a double edged sword here... retrowire Jan 2016 #45
"I've been unpleasantly surprised by the calls here for escalation and violent confrontation" Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #49
I wonder how ignoring them would work? gwheezie Jan 2016 #51
My first response was shut off the electric and water. davsand Jan 2016 #54
Violence may not be the answer Bettie Jan 2016 #55
Who here is saying that they should be patted on the head and told they're GGJohn Jan 2016 #59
There's all this hand wringing about Bettie Jan 2016 #63
No, nobody is saying they should just be left alone, GGJohn Jan 2016 #66
I suggested a tourist attraction gwheezie Jan 2016 #73
I like it, and the Feds can charge a fee for the entertainment of watching these RW assholes GGJohn Jan 2016 #76
Send in the drones passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #142
I'm not sure if they're delivering by drone yet. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #143
that was a joke John eom passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #145
Sorry, my age is creeping, actually, roaring up on me, GGJohn Jan 2016 #149
I've not said that there should be bloodshed Bettie Jan 2016 #75
Ummm, wrong, GGJohn Jan 2016 #78
If they are charged, they might go to prison Bettie Jan 2016 #80
Of course they're going to be charged, GGJohn Jan 2016 #82
You are a funny guy Bettie Jan 2016 #86
Ok, then when they're arrested, and they will be, charged and convicted, GGJohn Jan 2016 #88
Sure, if I'm wrong, I'll be Bettie Jan 2016 #96
Absolutely. GGJohn Jan 2016 #106
What we need are a few generals like U.S. Grant who know KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #163
Yep, just isolate them, no food, no water in, no supporters, no comms, no internet, GGJohn Jan 2016 #167
Should we murder people in this situation, or should we not? NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #100
I have said over and over Bettie Jan 2016 #104
I think they will be charged this time. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #109
We'll see Bettie Jan 2016 #120
Why do you say that? NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #124
The wrong solution would be to shoot them when no one else is at risk. pnwmom Jan 2016 #226
Shooting them may indeed be the wrong solution Bettie Jan 2016 #241
Exactly. Thi roll over and take it bullshit Lorien Jan 2016 #234
And blaring the Barney Song at them on endless repeat. n/t eggplant Jan 2016 #57
Hey FailureToCommunicate Jan 2016 #97
It does. (shudder) eggplant Jan 2016 #99
Yikes! But hard to believe THIS one didn't make the list... FailureToCommunicate Jan 2016 #103
Not the Barney song. Blast rap music as that will get under their skin. Some N.W.A. for example. LonePirate Jan 2016 #101
I kinda like 'oh my goodness' gwheezie Jan 2016 #107
Muskrat Love. Over and over, 24/7. Demit Jan 2016 #118
Wildfire. SMC22307 Jan 2016 #189
I'd mix in some industrial, too: kentauros Jan 2016 #190
Why would the oligarchy's media ignore them? They want the white, male, and heavily armed rage valerief Jan 2016 #60
The occupation just began. It will take time for national news crews to get there. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #68
The story is on NBC, ABC, CNN, FOX, etc. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #111
Yep, they're getting what they want. nt valerief Jan 2016 #112
I know I know The Jungle 1 Jan 2016 #64
A major terrorist occupation of a United States government building? GGJohn Jan 2016 #74
Soon they'll look like Jack Nicholson sitting in the snow Gman Jan 2016 #65
OH OH OH better Idea The Jungle 1 Jan 2016 #67
By their act, these men have decided that violence is their method of choice. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #81
You are correct... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #87
Agree! Provoking violence will accomplish nothing but more violence down the road! RKP5637 Jan 2016 #89
Yep, cut all utilities. Helen Borg Jan 2016 #91
Although, not all of these are actually occupying the building, it's more than 15 terrorists Hoyt Jan 2016 #92
This is not the militarized group that is in the Wildlife Refuge passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #155
Plz, people, this is how you get them out. griloco Jan 2016 #93
The Feds should just cut off all the utilities to the building, avebury Jan 2016 #95
since they are 'sovereign' can we just send them to Guantanamo when they give up? JCMach1 Jan 2016 #98
Agree 100% nt Quixote1818 Jan 2016 #108
Thank you cali JackInGreen Jan 2016 #110
Shoot the hostage. Take him out of the equation. Orrex Jan 2016 #114
Seize their bank accounts under RICO. It is undoubtedly and admittedly organized crime. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2016 #115
And I do like another's suggestion of sending olestra AllyCat Jan 2016 #116
Nah. Haribo Sugar Free Gummy Bears. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #185
OMG! Laughing so hard my family came to check on me to see why I was crying! AllyCat Jan 2016 #192
Yeah, I damn near fell out of my chair a few times reading those. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #201
Starve 'em Out ProfessorGAC Jan 2016 #122
Agree 100% SickOfTheOnePct Jan 2016 #123
turn off electric, gas and water, gas them and arrest and send them to Somalia larkrake Jan 2016 #126
The problem with that is the physical location. Lizzie Poppet Jan 2016 #157
Build a fence around the place and call it prison. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #128
They plan on bringing children in today MissB Jan 2016 #129
That should be easy to thwart cali Jan 2016 #131
I'm rather hoping so. MissB Jan 2016 #133
Child endangerment avebury Jan 2016 #137
kick Liberal_in_LA Jan 2016 #130
K&R nt Live and Learn Jan 2016 #134
they should be tried in military court as insurrectionists larkrake Jan 2016 #135
Even an insurrection would be tried in normal court. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #138
they claim to be militias, hense, military larkrake Jan 2016 #144
LOL. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #147
yes, if so deluded. Seizing a federal building allows for Gitmo, fed prison or Rivendale larkrake Jan 2016 #153
No one is saying they shouldn't be punished and imprisoned. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #156
Perhaps you are correct, I wish the Supremes had the case larkrake Jan 2016 #158
They first need to be tried by a regular federal court nadinbrzezinski Jan 2016 #160
Why? cali Jan 2016 #146
I think for fun they should set off loud fireworks outside the building Quixote1818 Jan 2016 #139
Have Donald Trump build a wall around the whole area and just leave them there. phleshdef Jan 2016 #151
... YvonneCa Jan 2016 #166
oh, siege yes, but also sic the IRS on their asses. send them to somalia if they hate govt so much. pansypoo53219 Jan 2016 #154
Just block ingress. Yawn. Wait. Arrest. DirkGently Jan 2016 #159
Agreed. Just shut off their supply routes. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #162
I agree, cali. They're not a threat so we can afford to be smarter than they are. n/t pnwmom Jan 2016 #169
I can not believe all I have been reading here Jim Beard Jan 2016 #177
This is a different situation then Waco Kaleva Jan 2016 #187
#Y'allQaeda #Yokel Haram #YeeHawd & Vanilla ISIS underpants Jan 2016 #178
Oregon sheriff says the group occupying a national wildlife refuge came to town under false pretense Jim Beard Jan 2016 #179
In 1969 Native American activists occupied Alcatraz Island kiva Jan 2016 #188
Work Monday? rockodman Jan 2016 #191
You're right! Hopefully they will prosecute them this time! DrewFlorida Jan 2016 #194
Leave those guys locked in there together ... Kablooie Jan 2016 #197
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #200
Here's What The Government Should Do... chwaliszewski Jan 2016 #205
How about a steady barrage of tear gas? Hulk Jan 2016 #206
Chances are very good that they're ready for this with gas masks. eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #211
True; but it gets damn hard to eat and drink through a mask Hulk Jan 2016 #217
Would you prefer milk and cookies? Lorien Jan 2016 #236
Would you prefer death and destruction? eom. GGJohn Jan 2016 #237
Good Point. Just like an armed terrorist could come into... Herman4747 Jan 2016 #260
I was thinking about those new "nonlethal crowd control" weapons Bucky Jan 2016 #244
Good idea. kacekwl Jan 2016 #209
They want a Ruby Ridge or Waco. artislife Jan 2016 #210
Following the insurrection by the domestic terrorists. nt silvershadow Jan 2016 #216
Tell that to the mother of Tamir Rice MadCrow Jan 2016 #219
And these terrorists are threatening violence if they aren't Lorien Jan 2016 #235
Yep. They want martyrdom, they want publicity, senz Jan 2016 #221
I agree... wait them out. JohnnyRingo Jan 2016 #223
They think they are serious, Twitter seems to think they are comedic clowns. Ridicule they got. L. Coyote Jan 2016 #224
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. AtheistCrusader Jan 2016 #225
You're right on this one, for sure. PatrickforO Jan 2016 #228
I agree with you violence is not called for davidpdx Jan 2016 #230
Agreed, you are absolutely 100% correct! RR2 Jan 2016 #238
Let them have it, fence it off, name it New Somalia.... Bonhomme Richard Jan 2016 #240
hmmm rtracey Jan 2016 #243
when you break the law and are ARMED the race of the NoMoreRepugs Jan 2016 #246
Don't cut the water WhoIsNumberNone Jan 2016 #247
"cut power, communications and water" left-of-center2012 Jan 2016 #248
That wildlife area hosts migratory waterfowl in the spring and fall but right now you have a ... Botany Jan 2016 #252
No, their claim is 200. How they got to that number is telling. ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2016 #253
I'm not one to trust "reporters"! atreides1 Jan 2016 #259
Simply cut power, communications and water. AlbertCat Jan 2016 #261
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
33. Gunners protecting gunners. These are the same racist gun yahoos who drew down
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:36 PM
Jan 2016

on federal agents. Give them two hours, two weeks, or whatever to walk out unarmed, then arrest them. If they draw their weapons, what is it you guys would do with your gunz?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
37. And if they refuse to walk out after 2 hours Hoyt?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:40 PM
Jan 2016

Would you escalate the situation by assaulting the building, initiating a possible shootout with the resulting deaths and injuries?

So far, they've done nothing more that commit the crimes of B&E and Trespassing, does that deserve the death penalty?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
58. Well GG, what was it you said you did when you got a mission? Surely, there are some more folks
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:05 PM
Jan 2016

like that who can take these racist gun lovers out. We need to quit killing Asians and Muslims who have done nothing to us, and concentrate on home grown terrorists.

We let the yahoos walk last time, and here they are again.

I'm fine with waiting the racist terrorists out, arresting them when they've had enough and sending them to Gitmo as terrorists. If they choose to shoot -- like a Randy Weaver or Branch Davidians -- well, actions have consequences.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
61. Well Hoyt, I was in, you know, an actual war, something you probably know nothing about.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jan 2016

Glad to see you're willing to wait them out rather than go in with guns blazing, like some here are advocating.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
69. You chose to be, and were gung ho about it. But, I agree that was a long time ago.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:19 PM
Jan 2016

Waiting them out, is more than these armed racist terrorists deserve. But, I'm fine with it as long as they are treated like terrorists when they walk/crawl their worthless asses out.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
203. this area in summer is atrociously hot. cut off water and it would take longer now but they would ca
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:11 PM
Jan 2016

How u would do that with a well ...

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
136. "Give them two hours..." I go along with Cali, instead.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:50 PM
Jan 2016

There is plenty of time for arrests later on, and upon conviction, stiff sentences. We don't need unnecessary and martyring bloodshed.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
141. Do terrorists get/deserve trials? I basically agree with you, but do find it interesting how the
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:58 PM
Jan 2016

gunners here are so concerned about these armed racist militia terrorists. But, then, they support Zman and a lot of similar stuff.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
152. You try to make this into a gun/no gun DU argument and you fail spectacularly.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jan 2016

Just labeling someone as a terrorist doesn't remove their rights as a US Citizen to a trial. You try to make it seem as though we just defend them because they have guns, but actually this is a defense of Civil Rights period.

6th Amendment:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.




Response to NutmegYankee (Reply #152)

roomtomove

(217 posts)
245. A non violent (somewhat) eviction method would be to
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:58 AM
Jan 2016

send in an LRAD....then they can be deaf as well as dumb.

RandySF

(59,167 posts)
183. Why am I not surprised
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:22 PM
Jan 2016

To see DU's resident gun nuts advocating "restraint" in this particular case?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
184. Bullshit!!
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:25 PM
Jan 2016

I would advocate restraint no matter who was doing this.
Take your shit elsewhere, it's not needed nor welcomed.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
193. Good on you.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:21 PM
Jan 2016

What is the problem with some of these people?

I mean where in the world did they come from?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
196. With some here, it'a always about race,
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:28 PM
Jan 2016

myself, I could care less what color these loons are, this situation needs to be handled with restraint and level headedness so no violence happens.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
212. yeah, sure
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:01 AM
Jan 2016

you should take your own advice. I think it's quite welcomed and about time these type of clown patriots were put in their place.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
239. you're welcome
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 09:50 AM
Jan 2016

from Trayvon Martin up until today, violence and killing of unarmed men and women is the order of the day. The usual people here are always EXCEEDINGLY quiet about that violence, but when 'patriots' are threatened, red alerts about violence go up everywhere. Yeah sure, I get it. They should have been made to understand, at the ranch incident, that you can't have snipers ready to kill federal agents and that the POTUS is the POTUS no matter what color he is. With these clowns it is ALWAYS about race, white male domination and control. So let the chips fall where they may....

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
249. Don't need to do anything violent, just lock them in there and ensure they don't leave
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 11:36 AM
Jan 2016

eventually they will start offing each other

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
2. My first thought was "Fuck the bastards" but saner thoughts came next. You're right. We don't..
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:51 PM
Jan 2016

...need to make any of these nuts a Martyr. Let them get cold and hungry for a few days.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
117. They are not holed up in a single building
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:39 PM - Edit history (1)

This is a large compound with multiple buildings on it (I posted a picture lower in the thread). It can probably hold quite a few people for some time (what they were hoping for...that more militia would join them). They came with supplies, intending to stay for a long haul (they say years). They probably have generators for power and their own food and water to last them awhile. In small numbers (like 15) they may be able to hold on for weeks or even a month or two. What happens to the people who work there? Where do they go for that time?

I'm not advocating charging in guns blazing, but this is something that needs to be addressed if it's going to last very long. Most of us have said cut off power and water (if they have generators, they have power and can keep a well pump going) and block all roads (out there with the right vehicles, they may not need a road to get in and out. It will be interesting to see how this is handled.

I want to see them all arrested as terrorists. I don't want to see a blood bath.

but this is not as simple as a few people in a single building who can only hold out a couple of days.

I'm not advocating anything here, but they are escalating a situation that started in Nevada and they aren't going to stop until they are arrested or people are dead.

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
148. Ah...I see. I though there was a rather quick solution to this scenario. Now I know the facts,..
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:25 PM
Jan 2016

...I've changed my mind about the whole thing. I vote for direct action for 2 reasons.
1. This is blatant disrespect for the people and the laws of the United States. Plus, these people are not protesting something that's wrong with the system. They're pissed because they're pissed. The father broke the law and got caught and WE don't like it. Tough Shit assholes.
And

2. You know we Democrats/progressives put up with vote fraud, corrupt EVERYTHING, anti-women bullshit, a war machine that's dragging us into a debtor's prison, (Put 50 another things here) and we protest some but try to go about it in a non-violent way.

These people start this bullshit because "My Da-da got put in jail..You Government bastards are destroying his right to take and burn land that's not his and we'll fuck up the whole system and maybe even kill some of the populace."

In short, I want to say WHAT!! You get pissed about THAT?
I'm with you except more aggressive now. Bring in the troops and get these stupid-hicks out now!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
150. Bring the troops?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:28 PM
Jan 2016

And what? Storm the building and start a shootout, making them martyrs for the next bunch of loons?

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
164. Yes. Exactly. Exactly what would happen if it were the Black Tigers (or whatever) and they had the
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:13 PM
Jan 2016

...same "I'll show you" attitude going down.

I'd even tell them that. "We're going to make martyrs out of you people today and if the rest of you redneck mother fuckers want to be martyrs, come on down and git your crown...cause I and probably 100 million adult Americans are just about fed up with your ignorance and your pig-fucking friends"

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
174. I disagree. Most people don't put themselves in a situation such as that.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:38 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Mon Jan 4, 2016, 06:05 PM - Edit history (1)

Unless they are shown that their actions are illegal, the next stunt they pull will involve innocent bystanders.
They're always so afraid the government will take their guns? Did they REALLY think they would stand a chance against an army?
Sorry,,,not the brightest citizens.

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
198. Seems like we've tried everything else with the people that continue to vote us into the dirt.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:54 PM
Jan 2016

Perhaps it's time to treat them the same way as they've treated the other side of life.
Sort of "Do undo others as they have done to you"

 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
171. Learning from past experiences, the longer the standoff occurs,
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:29 PM
Jan 2016

the higher the chance of public support. Break it up, swift and strong.

Don't even give the media a chance to make it a story.

The people who were the real reason for this story are going back to prison.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
172. The higher the chance of public support?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jan 2016

Doubtful, and if the govt goes in heavy handed, then there will be a jump in public support for these loons.
The proper course is to just isolate them and wait them out, they'll tire of it soon and give up.

Cheviteau

(383 posts)
207. Well here's something to consider.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:30 PM
Jan 2016

These fools are not blocking doorways and sticking flowers in army rifle barrels. These men are armed to the teeth daring all comers. They have taken over a government facility by armed force. And we're supposed to wait them out? I'm not in favor of rushing in a killing them without notice. I am in favor of setting a deadline and letting them know what that deadline is. And letting them know what the consequences will be if they don't "surrender". Otherwise, we encourage this sort of thing from other so called militia groups. Enough of this crap is enough.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
208. I'm not in favor of violence unless it's a very last resort.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:33 PM
Jan 2016

There is no need for violence in this case, just isolate them and wait them out, without electricity, water, food, comms, internet, they'll soon tire and come out, then the Feds can prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

rpannier

(24,336 posts)
229. Actually it tends to go the other way
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 04:26 AM
Jan 2016

The public likes what they perceive as strong reactions from leaders
I am for sending in force to deal with this
They've brought provisions and supplies for a long time
You can use all the hyperbole of murder and such you want.
I would say doing zip at the Bundy compound lead those yahoos to threaten those BLM employees on the road and then this
They feel empowered
Show them power

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
222. What do you suppose the reaction would have been if
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 01:56 AM
Jan 2016

instead of a bunch of militant white guys calling themselves a 'militia', the occupiers had been from something like BLM? How quickly do you think the big guns would have come out? And do you think that they (BLM) would have become 'martyrs?

How come when right-wing white guys do it, it's "Oh, God! Reason with them don't make martyrs out of the!!" But if black folk do it, we shoot first and ask questions later; not worrying about 'making martyrs' out of them??

I am so sick and tired of this BS I could just scream!!

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
4. Bundy thinks he's Robin Hood, so does his merry band of men.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:54 PM
Jan 2016

Do you suppose that they have enough clean tights to get through the next week?

KentuckyWoman

(6,692 posts)
7. you can turn um inside out and wear them another week.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:56 PM
Jan 2016

If they stay out of the jalapeno dip they could probably last a month.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
113. "Okay men... form up! It's time to change underwear!"
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:10 PM
Jan 2016

"Johnson; you change with Richards! Smith; you change with Jones! Robertson; you change with Lee! Dodd; you change with..."

I can see them lasting for months that way.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,829 posts)
5. I believe they are trying to provoke an armed confrontation
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:54 PM
Jan 2016

which would be the worst possible result. Some people are calling for an armed attack on the building because that's what would be done if it were occupied by, say, BLM - justifying a violent response by law enforcement by citing previous but wrong violent responses. These goons deserve to be arrested and prosecuted, but the most sensible way of arresting them is by cutting off the building's utilities and communications, surrounding the place, and waiting until they get cold and hungry enough to surrender. These aren't tough Special Forces guys; they're sad little soldier wannabes who'll cave when they run out of beer and pizza. The dumbest possible thing to do would be to storm the place with a SWAT team and make martyrs out of these bozos.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
119. I know it sounds like it
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:23 PM
Jan 2016
ome people are calling for an armed attack on the building because that's what would be done if it were occupied by, say, BLM


But I think a lot of people are just pissed that the response to a colored person would be way different than the response to these white assholes. Yeah, they may sound like they want the Feds to go blazing in, but I don't really think anyone wants that. They just don't like the unfairness of how this is being handled compared to POC.

demmiblue

(36,875 posts)
8. I am amazed at the bloodlust I have seen on this board.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:58 PM
Jan 2016

One in particular is trying to walk it back in a most odious way. To be expected, though.

I agree with everything you have written.

Bucky

(54,041 posts)
242. They're insulting the rule of law and the civility of our society. Anger isn't surprising.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:45 AM
Jan 2016

Agreed, none of them deserve to be shot at... and no law enforcement lives should be risked.

But as an expedient, I kind of wonder if one of those big LRAD machines might be judiciously deployed.

Aristus

(66,446 posts)
9. I agree with the call for non-violence.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:59 PM
Jan 2016

Put them under seige, and watch them descend into in-fighting; likely over who should be in charge based on who is the most 'patriotic'.

When they run out of Skoal, and start missing binge-watching Duck Dynasty, they come crawling out of there...

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
10. "cut power, communications and water"
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:01 PM
Jan 2016

This place is 50 miles from nowhere. You think it's connected to municipal water or something?

I doubt they headed out to a wildlife refuge with the idea they were going to need any of the facilities.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,829 posts)
18. If there's snow they can use that. But they'll need food eventually
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jan 2016

and it will get pretty cold if the electricity is cut off. Maybe they can hold out for awhile but not indefinitely. I would also suggest that the less publicity these doofuses get, the better.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
19. There are ample fresh water supplies
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jan 2016

And one may assume they have a good supply of propane or other fuel, along with plenty of MRE's and freeze dried food.

I would assume the facility has its own big honking propane tank in the first place.

This is a very remote facility, and the notion that they need electrical power, running water or electricity for some unspecified purpose suggests that someone doesn't spend a lot of time outdoors.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,829 posts)
23. I tried winter camping once and hated it, but
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:27 PM
Jan 2016

I'm aware that people can get by for awhile with minimal resources if they don't mind being uncomfortable. However, their food won't last forever. At some point the MREs or whatever they brought will run out. My point is, surround them and wait. Maybe it will take awhile if they have water and a heat source but they can't stay there forever.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
56. The issue might be water that's actually in liquid form.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:04 PM
Jan 2016

It's not likely to get above freezing much in Burns for a couple of months. Currently 28F and snowing, going to see single-digit lows for much of the coming week. I have no idea how that facility keeps its pipes unfrozen, but if it involves electricity, that could be a problem for the protesters.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
79. I would expect a remote HQ to have a propane tank
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:30 PM
Jan 2016

It is just a small stone cabin. It's not the Yellowstone Visitor Center.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
127. It's not just a small stone cabin
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jan 2016

Look it up on google maps. It's a compound with multiple buildings on it. I assumed they'd have a generator, but I think propane is far more likely. I don't think they will have any trouble holding out there for some time.

davsand

(13,421 posts)
173. Propane tanks have to be hooked up to something.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:38 PM
Jan 2016

I'm pretty sure that propane tank can be made non-functional without much trouble. I'm also pretty sure that firewood is not gonna replenish itself. I doubt that terrain supports artesian wells--those are a lot more rare than you might think. A traditional well can be shut down at the well pit--again something on the exterior of the building... If they want to shut that place down, I'm betting it can be turned into a siege situation fairly easily.

I'm sadistic enough that I'd park a freaking mobile pizza oven outside the perimeter and give away slices to all the cops--or bake a turkey--or bake pies...



Laura

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
181. You can't run a generator indoors
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jan 2016

Most generators will last much less than a day before you have to go outside and refill them with gas/propane. Running it inside would be dangerous and stupid. If it was outside, I doubt anybody would go outside to refill it with federal agents around. And if it was running, it would be easy to put a large bullet through it and shut it down.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
38. Odds are these guys are also preppers
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:40 PM
Jan 2016

I suspect they have everything they need to survive for an extended period.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
30. I've been winter camping in northern Vermont.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:35 PM
Jan 2016

What's your solution? It sounds like you're avidly looking for a violent confrontation

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
46. How does it sound that way
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:54 PM
Jan 2016

At what point have I suggested the use of violence in any manner?

You want to escalate the situation by increasing stress on nutty people, thus increasing the likelihood they will do something stupid.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
70. You are forgetting something important
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:20 PM
Jan 2016

In order for them to use snow for water, hunt for food, or access (safely stored) fuel, they need to leave a building surrounded by armed agents. How's that going to work then? How are they going to get out far enough to bag deer, put down arms long enough to field dress them, get them back (with no ATVs) to the building, etc?

No way 20 guys brought in enough food and fuel to last more than a couple of weeks. And if they are storing any significant quantity of fuel inside that building then we could well have Waco II here if a shot is fired at all.

They're not afoot in the wilderness as I understand it. They are holed up in what amounts to a large cabin approachable by road and with cleared areas (and parking lots) around it. They can't be allowed to leave the cabin and return.

My preferred solution involves a firehose down the chimney or through a window, get everything inside nice and wet, and turn off the power and light. 6 or 8 hours later you'll have control of a bunch of freezing souls at 10 degrees outside. They'll either come out on their own or be half out of it when you storm the place. No one needs to die, but a few fingers and toes might pay the price.


Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
186. Are they gonna be able to pump donuts and cheese doodles out of those wells?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:38 PM
Jan 2016

Surround them, cut them off, no one in, anyone who comes out is arrested.

Eventually their supplies will run out.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
12. It almost seems as though some want a repeat of Waco,
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:06 PM
Jan 2016

to make a point about "white privilege" or something.

Waiting for them to get hungry, cold, or bored and then having them give themselves up certainly seems a better solution than storming in with guns blazing.

LiberalArkie

(15,728 posts)
13. Yep. Barricade the roads so they can't run a get any food. Put in a cellphone jammer and
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jan 2016

RF jammer for satellite TV and over the air tv. Cut them off and wait. No media allowed within 10 miles. Have a small federal presence so that it appears no one cares about them at all.

LiberalArkie

(15,728 posts)
22. Never can tell. People will pack some food for a certain stay and go through it pretty quick.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:27 PM
Jan 2016

They will run out of water first. The question is does the federal building have a well and does the group have a generator. Since they don't have any hostages, the FBI can just wait them out.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
77. Is that like White Sands?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:27 PM
Jan 2016

Because someone must have dumped a shitload of white sand out there:



Is that a salt flat?

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
94. I would expect there is a sizeable water supply
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jan 2016

I don't think anyone ran 50 miles of pipe to get water from the town of Burns.

Given the various facilities there, I also doubt water is supplied on demand to taps by electrically operated pumps.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
62. There do seem to be facilities they can draw upon
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:09 PM
Jan 2016

They're clearly not sleeping on the floor of the gift shop. There's a three-bedroom volunteer bunkhouse with full kitchen, bathrooms, laundry and shower facilities, satellite TV and wi-fi. Notice also the references to fuel tanks. It does seem as though they're pretty well set up for a siege, providing they've brought enough food.


http://www.fws.gov/refuge/Malheur/what_we_do/get_involved.html

A limited number of rooms are available in our Volunteer Bunkhouse for non-RV volunteers. The bunkhouse is fully accessible and has a full kitchen, two bathrooms, satellite television and Wi-Fi access.


http://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/Region_1/NWRS/Zone_2/Malheur/Documents/MalheurNWR_FCCP_chapter5.pdf

Administrative facilities located at Refuge Headquarters on the south side of Malheur Lake, 32 miles south of Burns, consist of offices, a small visitor center and gift shop, the George Benson Memorial Museum, a conference room/library, a maintenance shop, and storage areas for maintenance and fire equipment. Five of the buildings at Refuge Headquarters and two buildings at the Buena Vista substation were built by the CCC.

Other buildings located at Refuge Headquarters include public restrooms, hazardous materials storage space, fuel tanks space, and residential housing. Residential housing includes a two-bedroom house for seasonal staff, a fire bunkhouse, a three-bedroom volunteer bunkhouse, a volunteer/RV Park common room, and a laundry and shower/restroom facility.

Government-owned living quarters for Refuge staff are located at the three substations (Buena Vista, P Ranch, and Double-O units). In addition to residences, a maintenance shop, storage areas for equipment, and fuel tanks can be found at the main substation areas. Government-owned housing for the P Ranch substation is located at the South Place maintenance area. A three-bedroom volunteer bunkhouse, equipment storage areas, and fuel tanks are located at the P Ranch proper.

Gore1FL

(21,151 posts)
105. I would assume the entrances are covered by law enforcement.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:02 PM
Jan 2016

Gathering food, snow, wood, etc wouldn't go without a pretty high risk of capture. Even if they manage food, clean water, and fuel it'll be a pretty bleak self-inflicted experience.

They'll need outside resources long before the everyone else needs that building.

dhill926

(16,353 posts)
14. totally agree...especially this part...
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:07 PM
Jan 2016

"Personally, I think they're hoping for a confrontation initiated by law enforcement. They obviously are seeking the spotlight. Deny them both."

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
17. I wonder if the people who are calling for murdering the idiots in the building understand terrorism
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:09 PM
Jan 2016

At the moment it's just a pathetic bunch of racist trash brandishing firearms to pretend that they have power. Eventually they will leave and be arrested. If we instead kill them, all that will do is radicalize their family and other like minded individuals and then we WILL have terrorism - the kind where someone parks a truck bomb outside of a building.

We learned this the hard way in Iraq.

Lancero

(3,011 posts)
218. Not suprisingly, that happened in the past.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:27 AM
Jan 2016

The Oklahoma City bombing was done by people angry over the deaths at Ruby Ridge and Waco.

Lorien

(31,935 posts)
231. Law enforcement now has drones with tazers
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 06:02 AM
Jan 2016

I'm sure they wouldn't hesitate to use worse on them if they were black, or Occupy protesters. Doing nothing only makes their ilk bolder.

Lorien

(31,935 posts)
232. Um, we attacked Iraq first
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 06:06 AM
Jan 2016

Vanilla ISIS is demanding that they get to vandalize public property and be given public resources for free. They've never been attacked. They won't be martyrs for not being allowed to blackmail the U.S. into giving them free stuff.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
258. Read up on Waco and Ruby Ridge.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:28 PM
Jan 2016

In both cases, the people under siege were not exactly law-abiding.

And in both cases, those same people became martyrs for the militia movement. Heck, the Oklahoma City bombing happened because of those incidents.

They don't actually have to be selfless and noble to be turned into martyrs. The spin doctors can easily take care of that after-the-fact.

 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
20. Let them continue to advertise their ignorance
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:22 PM
Jan 2016

and watch them shrivel up and limp away. If they wait until the Spring Migration starts they will have to deal with an army of birdwatchers. Little old ladies with binoculars will set these bums straight.

 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
24. agreed...the calls to violence here are appalling.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:29 PM
Jan 2016

All they have to do is put up a cross and the government will give them the land.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
102. The better way to treat these idiots is with total humiliation.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:57 PM
Jan 2016

Totally cut off all their connections with the outside world, cut off all utilities, blast them with loud music 24 hours a day, and so on.

The Feds could just rename the facility as a prison facility and let them just rot there. It was awfully nice of them to voluntarily go into lockup.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,869 posts)
125. Just tow their autos
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:37 PM
Jan 2016

Cut off their communications and make them walk home. It's 25 miles to the nearest town.

renate

(13,776 posts)
132. LOL--I kind of love your idea to rename it as a prison and let them sit there ad infinitum
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jan 2016

Their pride would drive them out.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
255. Yeah, it is both a funny & effective idea...
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:10 PM
Jan 2016

I myself am most fond of this idea. Unfortunately, it may not be constitutional as it entails incarceration before a trial.

renate

(13,776 posts)
262. wow, that's a very good point (I'm impressed!). but I wonder...
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 02:03 PM
Jan 2016

If they're free to leave at any time, is it really incarceration? Do you think that would keep it from being unconstitutional?

The Wielding Truth

(11,415 posts)
180. Best idea ever. Just post some guards and they can start serving their time in captivity.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:59 PM
Jan 2016

Hahaha. They are caught red handed.

Lorien

(31,935 posts)
233. And doing nothing will encorage them to do much worse
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 06:08 AM
Jan 2016

the white male privilege is what's appalling!

dogman

(6,073 posts)
25. They let them go after the Bundy Ranch episode.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:30 PM
Jan 2016

Two members went on to assassinate police officers. If only one member were a Muslim it would have been over already. Jail them now.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
26. Was thinking the same thing. These incidents are like dog whistles on DU
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:31 PM
Jan 2016

BUST THROUGH AND KILL THEM! Yeah, DU, sure. Make them Ruby Ridge type martyrs.

As long as they're not hurting people, starve them out. Should only take a few days.

PufPuf23

(8,822 posts)
27. You are level headed. Escalation is what evil people want
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:31 PM
Jan 2016

and calls for violent confrontation at DU are repulsive and give one doubt about this place.

Back off, starve and bore them out, put them in jail, and make sure they are never near a weapon again.

The right wing noise machine breeds and encourages these assholes.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
48. Which is the correct way to treat people?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:56 PM
Jan 2016

Should we go barbarian on everybody, or solve the institutional racism that drives the mistreatment of minorities?

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
52. That will be the plan.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jan 2016

There has been no actual violence so far, no destruction. It's become SOP for law enforcement to isolate the suspects and wait them out in such situations.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
256. Interesting that you mention FREEZE them out
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:14 PM
Jan 2016

when they do get apprehended, I favor imprisoning them in Alaska. (To be sure, there may not be a federal penitentiary there -- I don't know).

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
35. I'll bet every one of those idiots blames Tamir Rice for his death
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:39 PM
Jan 2016

yet they'd be martyrs for white supremacy if they die in a shootout with LEOs.

I'm fine letting the Feds use negotiation to try to end this situation but the press shouldn't mince words: these are bad guys with guns who have illegally occupied Federal property.

Tab

(11,093 posts)
41. From CNN - Plan is to wait them out
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:50 PM
Jan 2016
CNN law enforcement analyst Art Roderick, a retired U.S. marshal who investigated anti-government militias for years, warned that Bundy's call for supporters to join him might "turn into a bad situation."

"What's going to happen hopefully (is) ... we don't go out there with a big force, because that's what they're looking for," he said. "The last thing we need is some type of confrontation."

He said that over the years, law enforcement has learned how to handle a situation like this; one that hasn't erupted in violence and in which a law may be broken, but there's no immediate threat to anyone's life.

The best approach now, Roderick said, is to wait the group out and to figure out how to bring a peaceful end to the standoff.
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
42. Except that none charged some of these same idiots
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:50 PM
Jan 2016

For taking sniper positions in Nevada and drawing on Frderal agents. Oh that is 10 to 20. That alone emboldened them. Waiting them out is standard police practice. Thought would argue this is not a job for local law enforcement, but the FBI special Weapons and Tactics.

But some here are very correct. These are survivalists. So the wait will be long. And if they were insert minority here, we already would be in a fire fight.

Charges, this time, need to be filed. Otherwise this will continue to happen over and over and over again

And yes this is white supremacy on display. Not even white privileges. White supremacy.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
50. I am white. And I was just saying to my wife...
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:57 PM
Jan 2016

"What is it with white people thinking that all land belongs to them?"

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
53. Colonialism
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jan 2016

Is part of it.

Some of the reading I have been doing into law enforcement tells me we need (as a country) a change collectively in how we think

End if empire, and it will come, will be very painful...and I bet will make these problems far worst too

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
220. This did not even go all the way to the AG
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:54 AM
Jan 2016

the decision to charge or not, belongs with the US Attorney.

A lot of this crap starts at far lesser levels.

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
45. I see a double edged sword here...
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:54 PM
Jan 2016

If we cut the power, and drive them out peacefully, then that is obviously the high road and it's the best way that law can work.

But on the other hand...

I reinforces the ideal that, since they're white, they get carefully carted back to the courthouse, every body is given a slap on the hand and all is okay.

But if they were any other type of group, it wouldn't end peacefully so...

I dunno. But we should just drive them out peacefully either way.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
49. "I've been unpleasantly surprised by the calls here for escalation and violent confrontation"
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:57 PM
Jan 2016

Those fools are from the wrong "tribe." Thus it's okay, in the eyes of many here, to kill them.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
51. I wonder how ignoring them would work?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:58 PM
Jan 2016

They aren't going to feel they accomplished anything until they have fed agents fire on them or back down. So if they continue to occupy the building they win by either 2 things happening. Either it escalates and they go out in a blaze of glory or there is a protracted stand off and eventually the feds back down.
What if LE just goes home? Maybe even turn it into a tourist attraction? Make like a re enactment and charge a parking fee.
I'm being sarcastic on the last part.

davsand

(13,421 posts)
54. My first response was shut off the electric and water.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:01 PM
Jan 2016

I agree, Cali! No water, no electric, and no additional food brought in. Cut all access to outside by locking down the cell coverage. If they really want to play hardball, that well can be disabled (if you have ever lived with a well instead of city water, you know just how easy that is to do!) and that will speed the process up a lot. Then you just sit and wait. The siege is an age old military tactic, and we know it will work. One way or another, it will end. That isolation increases in its power if the media just stops publicizing it and the loudmouths inside that building are prevented from giving any further grandiose statements of patriotic fantasy.

The last thing in the world that anybody should be talking about is any sort of armed confrontation with these idiots because they see themselves as martyrs. Screw that. Don't feed the beast. We all know that, yes, there is more than enough firepower in the local police station or in the state police arsenal (most probably) to leave nothing more than a stain on that ground, but that is giving them what they seek. Makes no sense to encourage that.

If the good ole' boys want to sit in silence inside that building till summer, then let 'em. Think of it as a form of "timeout."

Bettie

(16,121 posts)
55. Violence may not be the answer
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:04 PM
Jan 2016

but neither is patting them on the heads and telling them they're not doing anything wrong, which is the solution many seem to advise.

Were they not a bunch of white guys, they'd be dead already. Pointing that out is not advocating violence.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
59. Who here is saying that they should be patted on the head and told they're
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:05 PM
Jan 2016

not doing anything wrong?
Kindly provide a link.

Bettie

(16,121 posts)
63. There's all this hand wringing about
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:12 PM
Jan 2016

people who suggest that it might end violently. See any one of the threads about this...much talk about how they are not endangering anyone and should just be left alone.

And no acknowledgement that had these people been anything other than white males, they'd already be dead. That's the thing, there is a double standard and far too many seem unable to accept that and are just worried about the poor little gunners and how they might get hurt.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
66. No, nobody is saying they should just be left alone,
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:19 PM
Jan 2016

what's being said is the the Feds should just surround the building, cut off all utilities, jam their comms and internet, and wait them out rather than assault the building with the resulting shootout and deaths.

So far, all these assholes have done is commit the crimes of B&E and Trespassing, why escalate the situation into bloodshed?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
76. I like it, and the Feds can charge a fee for the entertainment of watching these RW assholes
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:27 PM
Jan 2016

self destruct.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
142. Send in the drones
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:07 PM
Jan 2016

Put their lives on live TV!

Oops...just thought of a way for them to get food...by drone delivery. Does Amazon do that now?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
149. Sorry, my age is creeping, actually, roaring up on me,
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jan 2016

I don't recognize humor as much as I used to in my younger days. LOL.

Bettie

(16,121 posts)
75. I've not said that there should be bloodshed
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:26 PM
Jan 2016

I have said that it is sick that no one will acknowledge that there is a HUGE double standard.

And yes, you've just said that they have "only" done B&E and Trespassing...that means, a little slap on the wrist and then they get to go home.

Did anyone get any sort of consequences for the Bundy ranch thing? Nope.

And yet, every day persons of color die at the hands of police or others for the crime of existing while being not-white.

I have no doubt that these guys will come out eventually, all their demands having been met, and will move on to whatever their next target will be and have the same outcome with that act of domestic terrorism. Oh, wait, next act of "2nd Amendment Usage".

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
78. Ummm, wrong,
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:29 PM
Jan 2016

B&E is a felony, and a federal one at that due to the building they broke into, they'll more than likely be headed off to a Fed. prison, where there is no parole, in the Fed. system, you do the whole sentence, unlike the state systems.

Bettie

(16,121 posts)
80. If they are charged, they might go to prison
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:31 PM
Jan 2016

but I'm not holding my breath. People like these tend not to be prosecuted.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
82. Of course they're going to be charged,
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:33 PM
Jan 2016

the govt is going to prosecute these idiots to the fullest extent of Fed. law.

Bettie

(16,121 posts)
86. You are a funny guy
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:34 PM
Jan 2016

Really.

They won't be charged. Just like the Bundy ranch guys, they'll all go on their merry way when they choose to leave.

I'd like to be wrong, but we'll see what happens. Not holding my breath though. There will be no prosecutions, no arrests.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
88. Ok, then when they're arrested, and they will be, charged and convicted,
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jan 2016

will you come back and acknowledge that I was correct?

Bettie

(16,121 posts)
96. Sure, if I'm wrong, I'll be
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:44 PM
Jan 2016

happy to be wrong.

Now, when they are let go without any charges will you acknowledge that there is a HUGE double standard?

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
163. What we need are a few generals like U.S. Grant who know
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:10 PM
Jan 2016

how to conduct a good, old-fashioned siege (a la Vicksburg or Petersburg

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
167. Yep, just isolate them, no food, no water in, no supporters, no comms, no internet,
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:20 PM
Jan 2016

they'd soon see the errors of their way and give it up.
They think they have the support of the people, they couldn't be more mistaken, not even the people in the town want them there.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
100. Should we murder people in this situation, or should we not?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:54 PM
Jan 2016

I realize that we have racist police who murder minorities. I also think that such an action is wrong and we should take appropriate steps to stop such acts.

I don't see how 2 wrongs make a right.

Bettie

(16,121 posts)
104. I have said over and over
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:02 PM
Jan 2016

that violence is not the answer.

But, these clowns will likely not even be charged. They'll go on their merry way to their next target, knowing that for them, there are no consequences, while people who don't look like them get killed regularly for simply existing.

Who knows, this might be the time that they kill some federal agents and everyone will wring their hands and explain how if they had just let the whole thing go, the poor victims inside that building wouldn't have been "forced" to kill.

The point is simply that there is a double standard. Were these people not-white, they would already be dead.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
109. I think they will be charged this time.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jan 2016

This is an easy case to prosecute. I don't agree that non-white people in the same situation would be dead already. Police shootings usually occur in the heat of the moment. Any assault on this building will take time given the remoteness and climate. I doubt police could have gotten the forces in place already.

Bettie

(16,121 posts)
120. We'll see
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jan 2016

you don't believe in the double standard. That's fine.

I don't believe at all that there will be any consequences at all for these people, except maybe a slap on the wrist, like a small fine that they will never pay.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
124. Why do you say that?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jan 2016

I believe there is a double standard by police officers involved in stops and such. I also think law enforcement would approach a situation with armed minorities in a remote place in a similar manner as is being done here.

Police only like to kill or injure unarmed people - otherwise they might get hurt.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
226. The wrong solution would be to shoot them when no one else is at risk.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 04:01 AM
Jan 2016

We are wrong when we allow authorities to shoot black people in situations that don't involve any risk to the police or other people. The solution isn't to do it shoot white people too -- it's to treat black people as fairly as we would want to be treated.

Bettie

(16,121 posts)
241. Shooting them may indeed be the wrong solution
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:44 AM
Jan 2016

but so is letting them do as they please and then sending them on their way with a pat on the head and a light tap on the wrist for being "naughty" and that is what happens in situations like this.

Given what happened after Bundy Ranch (zero consequences), I do not believe there will be any here either. Heck, from news reports from the area they are still being allowed to come and go as they please from their newly captured party house.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
60. Why would the oligarchy's media ignore them? They want the white, male, and heavily armed rage
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:07 PM
Jan 2016

on the teevees to incite the white, male, and heavily armed asshole teevee viewers into action. They want the race war played out on a bigger scale. While the little people cull their own herds, the oligarchs harvest the spoils.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
68. The occupation just began. It will take time for national news crews to get there.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:19 PM
Jan 2016

The reporters on the scene are mostly in-state people that went out to Burns when these out-of-state idiots began showing up. The occupation only began yesterday, and travel isn't easy right now in that part of Eastern Oregon (well below freezing, snowing). Burns only has a small municipal airport (which may not even be open, given the weather conditions), so highway travel is really the only option. It's a long way to any population center from there, so while I'm sure crews are braving the trip, they're probably mostly not there yet.

 

The Jungle 1

(4,552 posts)
64. I know I know
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:15 PM
Jan 2016

Drop a bomb on them it worked for Mayor Good in Philadelphia.

Oh wait these guys aren't Black or Muslim. Maybe we should just talk nicely to them and hope they go home.

What I find interesting is we have a major terrorist occupation of a United States government building yet there was not one word about in my local news paper. You can bet there would be major coverage if these dopes were Muslim or Black.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
74. A major terrorist occupation of a United States government building?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:25 PM
Jan 2016

15 RW assholes broke into and occupied an empty building, so far, the only crimes committed are B&E and Trespassing on Federal lands.
Just cut off the utilities and wait them out, they'll tire soon and give up.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
65. Soon they'll look like Jack Nicholson sitting in the snow
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:17 PM
Jan 2016

After the next El Nino energized winter storm.

 

The Jungle 1

(4,552 posts)
67. OH OH OH better Idea
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:19 PM
Jan 2016

Blast them with classical music and jam the goat roping stations.
Night and day.
They won't last 5 hours.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
81. By their act, these men have decided that violence is their method of choice.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:32 PM
Jan 2016

I would rather see them all sent to prison.

But if their act leads to their deaths, then I will not shed a tear over their choice to waste their lives for extreme conservative libertarian points of view.

A group that chooses to take up arms against the government is not to be coddled.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
87. You are correct...
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:35 PM
Jan 2016

...cut off their supplies and communications and wait them out. They won't last long. Then prosecute their asses.

But be ready in case they do start shooting.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
89. Agree! Provoking violence will accomplish nothing but more violence down the road!
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jan 2016
Personally, I think they're hoping for a confrontation initiated by law enforcement. They obviously are seeking the spotlight. Deny them both.
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
92. Although, not all of these are actually occupying the building, it's more than 15 terrorists
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jan 2016

involved.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
155. This is not the militarized group that is in the Wildlife Refuge
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:32 PM
Jan 2016

This group is here to protest the Hammond's prison sentence. The group in the wildlife refuge is the Bundy group and they don't care about the Hammonds. They have taken this opportunity to fight the Federal Government...or at least get in the news about it.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
95. The Feds should just cut off all the utilities to the building,
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:43 PM
Jan 2016

totally surround it to prevent anybody going in or out and then wait them out. Totally isolate them from the world is the way to go. Cell phones will only last until the batteries run out. Unless they took in food and water with them they will eventually get hungry. A person can last longer without food then they can water. With no electricity it will get cold.

They cannot win if the Feds refuse to engage them. Set up a large enough perimeter that even the media can't get anywhere near the building. Bring in cell phone jamming equipment to prevent them from communicating witht the outside with their cellphones until such time as their cellphones run out of juice. They could consider blasting them with loud music like they did Noriega.

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
110. Thank you cali
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:07 PM
Jan 2016

This mornings disagreements here gave painted pretty clear distinctions amd highlighted for me even more how our part of the left has been coopted by right wing hyperviolence.

AllyCat

(16,216 posts)
192. OMG! Laughing so hard my family came to check on me to see why I was crying!
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:21 PM
Jan 2016

Oh dear, that is fantastic.

ProfessorGAC

(65,159 posts)
122. Starve 'em Out
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jan 2016

They'll last 7 days, tops. They're weeines with guns. Just wait them out until they start calling for mommie.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
123. Agree 100%
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jan 2016

I'm curious as to what they've done in the way of terrorism - I keep seeing them referred to as terrorists.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
157. The problem with that is the physical location.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:35 PM
Jan 2016

I've been there quite a few times. Malheur Wildlife Refuge HQ is pretty isolated, with the nearest neighboring buildings being a couple miles away and the nearest town of any size (Burns, pop. c. 3000) 15 miles or so away. Moreover, it's in open country: the land right around the little compound it largely treeless and pretty level. Getting close enough to mess with the well (there's an actual spring about 1500 feet from the buildings) would expose the people doing it to fire. If there's gas there, it will be a propane tank in the compound, not a pipeline. Cutting off electricity should be easy...but these dipshits apparently brought generators, so their fuel would have to run out before that became an issue.

I have no problem with this taking time. That isolation that serves these guys so well also ensures that they're no threat to anyone and they're not going to be able to get away. Cut them off, wait them out...

avebury

(10,952 posts)
137. Child endangerment
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:52 PM
Jan 2016

And the charges just keep piling up.

These people are really not the brightest bulbs in the room. The Feds just need one really good spin master to turn this around and toally humilate these idiots. Just like groups like Isis and AlQeada use children for their terrorist goals, so does this group.

 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
153. yes, if so deluded. Seizing a federal building allows for Gitmo, fed prison or Rivendale
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:32 PM
Jan 2016

Good humor tho. Of course, so many have been disappeared for those not under NRA protection. Point is that lawbreakers must be punished, not let off. The 2nd amendment does not allow seizing a federal building, or poaching on a game reserve. I'd love to own the Rocky mountains but I dont have the law on my side to plant my personal flag.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
156. No one is saying they shouldn't be punished and imprisoned.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:35 PM
Jan 2016

I'm just pointing out that even a charge of treason doesn't wave the civil rights of the accused.

 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
158. Perhaps you are correct, I wish the Supremes had the case
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:41 PM
Jan 2016

not that five follow constitutional law, but at least they would be forced to actually define the limits of militias so we can do away with the runaway definition congress follows.($$$$$$$)

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
160. They first need to be tried by a regular federal court
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:54 PM
Jan 2016

then at the appellate level, and then the USSC needs to even accept to hear this case. And that is assuming charges are even filed, as they should have, and were not, at the Bundy Ranch.

Quixote1818

(28,960 posts)
139. I think for fun they should set off loud fireworks outside the building
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:55 PM
Jan 2016

at night and put a big red laser beam on the premises so they think a laser guided missile is coming. Then nab those that try to take off.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
159. Just block ingress. Yawn. Wait. Arrest.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:53 PM
Jan 2016

The Sovereign Citizen yahoos have screwed themselves pretty good here, so long as no one overreacts, which presumably is what they're counting on.

There's nothing there, so they have no leverage to create their dreamed-of stand-off with Government.

Doesn't matter how many freeze-dried crackers they have -- they have nothing to do, and there is no urgency to get them out or do anything at all. They have no hostages. No assets anyone needs to do anything with right at the moment.

They've basically locked themselves in an empty closet, expecting a dramatic showdown.

It sounded like the Bundy kid wanted to "claim" the place for future Militia Nut use, but so long as no one is permitted to join them, and anyone who comes out is arrested, 100% of the pressure is on them.

They're just sitting around, fingering their weapons, writing dire Facebook posts they probably can't even put up, hoping to attract attention.

That's going to get old very fast.
 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
177. I can not believe all I have been reading here
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:50 PM
Jan 2016

the longer the standoff runs, the more time for media support of these thugs. Already the news trucks are lined up and going to Washington to continue and spread any propaganda and make it a main news story what ever they choose but mark my words, they will be made out as heroes. Remember Waco???? News trucks were lined up for miles and stayed there for days. Power and water were cut and the situation was creating sympathy for the. They even let Koresh have TV time to discuss the bible or his bible. By the time the feds decided to do something, there was a large support the people.

They should have hit them from day one before they even got a chance to determine their suicide plan taken the children when they were visiting in town. Janet Reno caught hell anyway,

Same with the Iranian "students" taking our Embassy and holding the staff hostage, the longer it went on, the worse it was for the United States.

Kaleva

(36,333 posts)
187. This is a different situation then Waco
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:47 PM
Jan 2016

At Waco, there were children. There are none at the wildlife refuge. My guess is that as happened at the Bundy Ranch, the media and people will get bored of the standoff and turn their attention to other matters.

 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
179. Oregon sheriff says the group occupying a national wildlife refuge came to town under false pretense
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:55 PM
Jan 2016
Ranching Standoff

''An Oregon sheriff says the group occupying a national wildlife refuge came to town under false pretenses.

Sheriff David Ward says the men came to Harney County in remote southeastern Oregon claiming to be there in support of local ranchers, but were really there to spark a movement to overthrow the government.

The sheriff says he is working with local and federal authorities to keep the citizens in his county safe and to quickly and peacefully resolve the situation that began Saturday evening after a peaceful protest in the nearby town of Burns.

He is asking people to stay away from the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge for their own safety. Ward says he does not think any other parts of the county are in immediate danger.''

kiva

(4,373 posts)
188. In 1969 Native American activists occupied Alcatraz Island
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:53 PM
Jan 2016

for 19 months. The government didn't shoot at them or demand their surrender, they just waited. No deaths due to violence, one accidental death.

For posters who believe that the best thing the government should do to a bunch of people illegally occupying U.S. government land is to force them to surrender and kill them if they refuse...well, I'm just glad they weren't in charge in 1969.

rockodman

(20 posts)
191. Work Monday?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:07 PM
Jan 2016

What happens Monday when Federal employees return to work? Let then go in unprotected? That's when the rubber meets the road.

DrewFlorida

(1,096 posts)
194. You're right! Hopefully they will prosecute them this time!
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:21 PM
Jan 2016

After the "Bundy Ranch" standoff, where many militia wack-jobs were seen aiming guns at federal agents, I expected those people to be rounded up and arrested a short time later. But that never happened, those criminals were allowed to roam free with zero repercussions. I will be very disappointed if the same thing happens this time.

Kablooie

(18,641 posts)
197. Leave those guys locked in there together ...
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:30 PM
Jan 2016

For a few weeks and by the end they'll be shooting each other.

chwaliszewski

(1,514 posts)
205. Here's What The Government Should Do...
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:26 PM
Jan 2016

Do not engage in a battle with these gun-humpers. That is exactly what they want. Cut power & water. Blast some annoying music 24/7 (like Justin Bieber or Pentatonix). Air drop a bunch of skunk oil to stink'em out. But above all else, no shooting. That's what they want.

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
206. How about a steady barrage of tear gas?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:30 PM
Jan 2016

Nobody needs to die over this, but this bull shit needs to cease.

Allow these weak minded, paranoid idiots to gather strength by rounding up all the idiots from every corner of the country is going to make for even a bigger problem.

Cut the power...give them a warning, then drop the gas and get the dogs ready to take the terrorists down.

No need to kill anyone, unless they are crazy enough to open fire on the government.

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
217. True; but it gets damn hard to eat and drink through a mask
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:17 AM
Jan 2016

The Israelis have tested all the latest tear gas weapons we've produced....let's test them out for a week or two...steady. Plunk...plunk....plunk. What can it hurt?

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
260. Good Point. Just like an armed terrorist could come into...
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:34 PM
Jan 2016

a nuclear plant already wearing a bulletproof vest.

Bucky

(54,041 posts)
244. I was thinking about those new "nonlethal crowd control" weapons
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:48 AM
Jan 2016

They're ugly, but apparently quite effective.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
210. They want a Ruby Ridge or Waco.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:44 PM
Jan 2016

Death by police is their aim.


And yet....the police aren't frightened enough.

MadCrow

(155 posts)
219. Tell that to the mother of Tamir Rice
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:41 AM
Jan 2016

These people have committed a crime. They have real weapons, but violence is not the answer. But if you are a 12 year old black boy with a toy gun, you are dead in less than a minute. What is wrong with this picture? Just asking.

Lorien

(31,935 posts)
235. And these terrorists are threatening violence if they aren't
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 06:12 AM
Jan 2016

allowed to steal and destroy public lands, and all because the Kochs are paying them to do so. Saying "It's OK, no harm done!" will lead to much worse. BLM, for the record, is fucking livid!

JohnnyRingo

(18,640 posts)
223. I agree... wait them out.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 02:38 AM
Jan 2016

They want an armed confrontation to ignite support nationwide.

If denied power and water with no undue attention, they'll leave soon. Then they can be arrested individually. I'm sure the feds know who each and every one of them are.

Hopefully, the news organizations will stay away as well and starve them of the publicity they so desire.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
224. They think they are serious, Twitter seems to think they are comedic clowns. Ridicule they got.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 02:42 AM
Jan 2016

Some good new memes today.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
225. Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 03:52 AM
Jan 2016

(Hari Seldon, via the mind of Issac Asimov)

There are some unpleasant folks that were rooting for violence in places like Ferguson. Don't be like them. The siege of Waco led to the radicalization of a white, right wing terrorist that destroyed the Oaklahoma City federal building a few years later.

This kind of shit has consequences. Violence leads to the worst of them.

PatrickforO

(14,586 posts)
228. You're right on this one, for sure.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 04:11 AM
Jan 2016

The Bundys and that 'militia' is a group of heavily armed crazies in a nation FILLED with heavily armed crazies. If the president were anyone but Obama, I'd say roll in the tanks and hang 'em high. But alas, Obama has committed the high crime, in these peoples' eyes of being president while being black, so the heavily armed right wing crazies who have been propagandized with ejaculate from the Fox 'news' corporate propaganda organ and hate-talk radio for years and years might see an escalated police reaction as a call to revolution and come crawling out from under their crazy rocks all over the United States.

I think the police should just keep the area cordoned off don't let anyone out or in, and turn off the power. Seriously. They'll come out after a few weeks, especially after the 24 hour corporate owned media news cycle forgets them.

Otherwise will have Duck Dynasty looking 'militias' that are little more than hate groups, like the Stahlhelm was in its day, marching in jackboots and brown shirts through our streets.

And I shit you not. This is a really serious situation - not this one little thing, but what I've described above. Because it is REAL, and thse assholes will cheerfully beat you to death just for disagreeing with them. If these shits get in power the government will begin to build camps...

Let's not go there.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
230. I agree with you violence is not called for
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 05:56 AM
Jan 2016

Turn the power and water off. Make it as uncomfortable for them as possible. Then when they do come out make them face the music for their actions. They need to be put on trial for insurrection of the government.

 

rtracey

(2,062 posts)
243. hmmm
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:46 AM
Jan 2016

Last edited Mon Jan 4, 2016, 03:33 PM - Edit history (1)

Really. Just cut the power, communications and water?... Many of these "patriots" are survivalists, hunters, farmers, etc. I would bet many would still be able to survive without power. I think blockage of the roads in and out and allowing their food supply to dwindle. I believe a presence of the law to prevent them from hunting / fishing for food would work.

Also start blasting heavy metal music through some major amps from 8pm until 6am........hahahah

NoMoreRepugs

(9,454 posts)
246. when you break the law and are ARMED the race of the
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jan 2016

perpetrators should not matter. But this is 'Merica and its the only thing that matters. The longer
this goes on and the more attention it finally draws the more the open sore that is racism in this country will become evident to most (not all of course) of the country

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
248. "cut power, communications and water"
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 11:30 AM
Jan 2016

And block access so other armed "patriots" can't join them.
Oh ~ and no pizza delivery.

Botany

(70,567 posts)
252. That wildlife area hosts migratory waterfowl in the spring and fall but right now you have a ...
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 11:43 AM
Jan 2016

.... whole lot of nothing there except for jack rabbits, coyotes, and antelopes. This area is high
or cold desert and it gets cold and nasty in the winter so I agree w/cutting their electricity and
their water (if they have a well no power = no water) and close them off and they will be out in
no time.


BTW malheur national wildlife refuge is a very successful fed. program started by Teddy Roosevelt.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
253. No, their claim is 200. How they got to that number is telling.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 11:46 AM
Jan 2016

They first had everyone raise their hands and counted each one. Unfortunately, that resulted in the spillage of many beers, and the dropping of loaded weapons with their safeties off.
Once they replaced the beers, treated the self inflicted gunshoot wounds, they tried again, only this time they had everyone put their beer and guns down BEFORE counting.

Then they had two guys, one from each direction, start counting raised arms. they both had 30 each, so they decided to repeat from the opposite direction, to prevent any missing arms. That gave them another 30 each, totaling 120, which in YallQaidaStan rounds up to 200.

atreides1

(16,091 posts)
259. I'm not one to trust "reporters"!
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:31 PM
Jan 2016

There may not be more then 15 there right now, but since the local law enforcement has been in hiding, and the FBI hasn't gotten much in the way of assets on the ground, by the time the feds actually put any plans into place, there could be 200+...and that would probably include women and children!

Right now it's all about who gets there first!

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
261. Simply cut power, communications and water.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:50 PM
Jan 2016

Really.

Some Medieval Knights sieging the place would do the trick. Just cut them off and when they run out of beer, they'll come out.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There are not 200 armed m...