Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsImagine a jury of your peers composed of 7 free republic members, 2 independents, and 3 du members
The Edwards trial is political and it's happening in the jury room.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1351 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Imagine a jury of your peers composed of 7 free republic members, 2 independents, and 3 du members (Original Post)
itsrobert
May 2012
OP
I have to agree with you. Edwards is a dick jerk. But this case should never have seen the
southernyankeebelle
May 2012
#2
freshwest
(53,661 posts)1. Agreed, generally speaking.
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)2. I have to agree with you. Edwards is a dick jerk. But this case should never have seen the
light of day. There it is taxpayers money going down the drain. Whoever brought this case in the first place should be fired. Politics.
patrice
(47,992 posts)3. Crappy case goes forward due to DOJ Capture? in order to make an example of anyone who even
flirts with the idea of betraying our Masters and their pet Hedge Funds . . . especially an insider.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)4. And the judge doen't sound much better - send them back to continue the deliberation. I doubt they
will ever agree on much.