Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNate Silver: One Big Reason To Be Less Skeptical Of Trump
But the reason Ive been especially skeptical about Trump for most of the election cycle isnt listed above. Nor is it because I expected Trump to spontaneously combust in national polls. Instead, I was skeptical because I assumed that influential Republicans would do almost anything they could to prevent him from being nominated.
Im in the midst of working on a long review of the book The Party Decides, so well save some of the detail for that forthcoming article. But the textbook on Trump is that hed be a failure along virtually every dimension that party elites normally consider when choosing a nominee: electability (Trump is extremely unpopular with general election voters); ideological reliability (like Sarah Palin, Trumps a maverick); having traditional qualifications for the job; and so forth. Even if the GOP is mostly in disarray, my assumption was that it would muster whatever strength it had to try to stop Trump.
But so far, the party isnt doing much to stop Trump. Instead, its making such an effort against Cruz. Consider:
-The governor of Iowa, Terry Branstad, said he wanted Cruz defeated.
-Bob Dole warned of cataclysmic losses if Cruz was the nominee, and said Trump would fare better.
-Mitch McConnell and other Republicans senators have been decidedly unhelpful to Cruz when discussing his constitutional eligibility to be president.
-An anti-Cruz PAC has formed, with plans to run advertisements in Iowa. (By contrast, no PAC advertising has run against Trump so far in January.)
You can find lots of other examples like these. Its the type of coordinated, multifront action that seems right out of the The Party Decides. If, like me, you expected something like this to happen to Trump instead of Cruz, you have to revisit your assumptions. Thus, Im now much less skeptical of Trumps chances of becoming the nominee.
Im in the midst of working on a long review of the book The Party Decides, so well save some of the detail for that forthcoming article. But the textbook on Trump is that hed be a failure along virtually every dimension that party elites normally consider when choosing a nominee: electability (Trump is extremely unpopular with general election voters); ideological reliability (like Sarah Palin, Trumps a maverick); having traditional qualifications for the job; and so forth. Even if the GOP is mostly in disarray, my assumption was that it would muster whatever strength it had to try to stop Trump.
But so far, the party isnt doing much to stop Trump. Instead, its making such an effort against Cruz. Consider:
-The governor of Iowa, Terry Branstad, said he wanted Cruz defeated.
-Bob Dole warned of cataclysmic losses if Cruz was the nominee, and said Trump would fare better.
-Mitch McConnell and other Republicans senators have been decidedly unhelpful to Cruz when discussing his constitutional eligibility to be president.
-An anti-Cruz PAC has formed, with plans to run advertisements in Iowa. (By contrast, no PAC advertising has run against Trump so far in January.)
You can find lots of other examples like these. Its the type of coordinated, multifront action that seems right out of the The Party Decides. If, like me, you expected something like this to happen to Trump instead of Cruz, you have to revisit your assumptions. Thus, Im now much less skeptical of Trumps chances of becoming the nominee.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/one-big-reason-to-be-less-skeptical-of-trump/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 881 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nate Silver: One Big Reason To Be Less Skeptical Of Trump (Original Post)
brooklynite
Jan 2016
OP
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)1. Trump has a lock on the nomination...
When FL GOPers most likely to vote were recently polled his lead over Cruz, Rubio & Bush COMBINED was in the double digits; more importantly, his "favorable" ratings are rising. Democrats should plan accordingly.
For FL haters: Obama carried the state twice.
Johonny
(20,856 posts)2. But we all knew already that no one within the party likes Cruz as a person.
He's embarrassed what's left of the power base with stupid government shutdowns and power plays in the senate. He's made mostly enemies since getting elected, and few friends.