= new reply since forum marked as read
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2016/02/2_georgia_state_students_kicke.html
By Erin Edgemon | eedgemon@al.com
Email the author | Follow on Twitter
on February 27, 2016 at 8:12 PM
Two Georgia State University freshmen claim they were kicked out of a Hillary Clinton rally on Friday for writing "Black Lives Matter" on the back of a Clinton sign.
"The ironic thing is that the staffer gave me the sign in the first place. If they hadn't given it to us, I would not have written it down," Ashona Husbands told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
Her friend, Meagan Mwanda, who was also ejected, said: "Why are these three words such a threat to her and her campaign?"
The Clinton campaign told the newspaper the Secret Service nor the campaign kicked anyone out of the rally at Atlanta City Hall. Atlanta police did escort two people out of the rally for having signs, according to the report.
FULL story at link.
https://twitter.com/shelbyholliday/status/703284100191416321/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Just pointing out Hillary's record isn't squeaky clean with super predators and click to heel.
There are bad actions by DUers here too.
Don't you know that you've got a whole internet full of white people eager to explain race to you?
There, ya got another one. 
Perhaps some hate is superior to others.
Is the poster, Madhound, authorized to represent JPR, or this post ref in the OP just his?
Which is what the OP's author explicitly said happened. Put aother way, much garbage has been puked up on DU and other sites. It doesn't necessarily mean everyone, including site administrators, endorse that garbage. Of course people might conclude that it does if they are pre-disposed to think along those lines anyway.
Heavens, can you imagine the consternation among some if Eleanors38 said that the anti-gun policies of DU are crippling the Democratic Party? Probably not, but if Skinner and the Ads said so it would give pause.
I've come to realize that so many so-called progressives are "Not My Comrades."
TWiLA! TWILA!
I just realized that, of the people I know who were/are for Bernie or Jill, of those who say they're voting FOR Trump in their anger and disgust, they're all men.
Certainly I know women who refuse to vote for Hillary or Trump, but those I see changing their vote TO Trump are men.
Never thought about that until just now.
Sadly I also know conservative women who have been pro-Trump the entire time.
(I am a Bernie supporter, btw.)
What to do?
They do have their following, though.
to keep them off the street corners. 
Bernie screamed that he said "Black Lives Matter 50 times"
Look, I don't like to dismiss Bernie, but there is a reason he did not resonate with minorities and women.
He believes that social issues are wedge issues. He believes that everything can be solved through economics alone. He refuses to address social and equality issues in any way, except economically.
along with others in this thread. Crackpot "ignorant elitists" in desperate need of jobs!
Howzabout you stop analyzing me, Sigmund, and start talking policy. A good place to begin would be the parallels between the BLM and Sanders' platforms. No one seems to want to discuss that. Why is that? 
to acknowledge that since it made her look good in the face of phony "Wall Street" blah blah blah.
She was also for Single Payer 20-something years ago, but her phony detractors can't acknowledge that since it makes her look good. She realized 20-something years ago that it would never pass, so she adopted other more passable measures.
I could go on, but you get the picture. It's more her detractors that are "sticking their head in the sand" about her. And about Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton was one of the only Presidents to leave office with a surplus. But instead we heard bullshit about Gore being the same as Bush so that surplus went away.
And we all know Trump is all insults. That's it. It's hilarious now how all of a sudden "fear" is a really big "issue" when you all said the same thing about people being afraid of Sanders. LOL. 
Good Lord, I voted in my state of California on June 7th, and here we are almost two months later with this phony and continued hostile imaginary superiority complex associated with the losing campaign. Enough is enough.
UGH!
The first few items on the BLM list were actual items that Bill Clinton/Al Gore championed some 25 years ago. They are hardly a "Sanders" platform. They are a Democratic platform. Bill Clinton rolled back the Reagan tax cuts which raised taxes on the rich. Remember? Huh? Go! Al Gore is the original author of climate change. Remember??
The rest are just friggin common sense items with the TPP being a bludgeoning tool adopted by Sanders to attack. And a couple Sanders didn't address because what his main goal as stated in his campaign was to appeal to disaffected white voters. It's obvious as you read BLM's items what I'm referencing. And it's obvious you are being disingenuous when you state that all BLM's policy issues are the sole ideas of Sanders. I'm so sick of this phoniness. Primaries are over, so let's support the nominee now.
I'm sick and tired of it. I can't imagine what would happen if I told you to go take drugs and lie down, insinuating I am superior to you. Good Lord. And look at your own posts in this thread. They are completely irrational.
And LMAO at you going back 25 years to insult the Clintons if it makes them look bad. But anything that makes them look good is dismissed. Now you get the idea that talking "policy" is really a one-sided dealio with the phony talking points you throw out. So it was you who was "twisting away."
And the candidates didn't differ all that much, with you completely ignoring that Sanders did, in fact, lose the minority vote by wide margins. Completely lost them. So it's pretty ridiculous for you to insist they were aligned with Sanders when the FACTS are that he completely lost them. Now I wonder if you'll ever acknowledge that fact, but I doubt it.
I replied with correct info. Is the correct info not allowed on the DU?
Got a link to your opinion? "And he didn't resonate with minorities and women, as those results indicate."
Age gap cuts into Clinton’s support among female voters: http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/07/25/age-gap-cuts-clintons-support-among-female-voters/87556856/
Maureen Feighan, The Detroit News 11:49 p.m. EDT July 25, 2016
As Hillary Clinton pushes toward the White House, she has strong support among women in their mid-30s and older, but her message and historic campaign haven’t resonated as much with younger female voters.
In early June, a CNN analysis of entrance and exit polls during the primaries in 27 states found that the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee soundly beat Sen. Bernie Sanders among all female voters — 61 percent to 37 percent overall. But it wasn’t the case among female voters 18 to 29, where Clinton lost by an average of 37 percentage points to Sanders.
In Michigan, Sanders shocked the Democratic establishment when he narrowly upset Clinton in the March 8 primary, 49.8-48.2 percent. A CNN exit poll found 51 percent of white women voted for Sanders compared with 47 percent for Clinton. Clinton had stronger support among African-American women – 66 percent.
For Audra Flores, a senior at Central Michigan University who started “feeling the Bern” after she saw an interview of Sanders a year ago, he is just the all-around better candidate.
FULL story at link.
But it does ask some interesting questions about the parallels between BLM's demands and Bernie's platform. No one is touching that, of course, because it doesn't fit the narrative. Imagine!
And with that, I'm off. One can take only so much online victimhood in one night.
rather than discussion of the parallels between BLM's demands and the Sanders campaign, conveniently glossed over by the OP. Doesn't fit the narrative, eh? LOL
backatcha.
I salute you. 
you are a horrible person.. >>>> <<<<
My Dad, of all people told me about that--he was a racist young guy who grew into a racist old guy before he passed on. I wonder if this is what the poster is referring too?
Comments in the game focus on the opposite player's intelligence, appearance, competency, social status, financial situation, and disparaging remarks about the other player's family members—mothers in particular ("yo? mama..."
—are common.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dozens
If so, I find it innapropriate given the topic.
