General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow much intolerance should be tolerated?
Yes, we believe in free speech and free expression but does there come a moment where we must say, "No, we cannot tolerate something that is so corrosive and divisive that it is a danger to our country"?
Isn't that the position that the Democrats have been put in - with regards to the going to the Trump inauguration or whether or not Trump is a "legitimate" President?
Perhaps we have tolerated too much already?
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)exactly that.
That the left should tolerate their intolerance.
They *really* believed it too.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)tells me that they do not think very highly of our country or themselves and have very low expectations for our future? They heard it all. Yet, they voted to take our country down that dirty low road.
NRaleighLiberal
(60,015 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)Oh wait, they do.
Tolerance is not about never objecting to a single thing. I could go into more detail, but it would got over the heads of the trolls who are the only ones who need the explanation. Immature, simplistic inability to understand complicated issues and a tendency to by a total fucking asshole is the trademark of the RW troll.
GaYellowDawg
(4,447 posts)That ought to take them a little while to unpack.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Originally found here: https://extranewsfeed.com/tolerance-is-not-a-moral-precept-1af7007d6376#.yme69etfd
Tolerance is the peace treaty we live by so people of multiple religions, cultures, and so on, can live together without strangling each other.
When the intolerant violate that peace, that peace treaty we call tolerance is in abeyance, and we're well within our rights to be intolerant towards the intolerant.