General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFreudian slip? Trump's denial of pee-pee-gate surely has an odd wording:
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/trump-offers-odd-denial-of-pee-pee-gate-i-was-never-even-in-that-room-for-that-period-of-time/Its made up. Never existed. Never happened, Trump continued, speaking specifically about the unverified report regarding the prostitutes. And the reason I say that so strongly because nothing is ever going to show up. Theres never going to be a tape that shows up. Theres never going to be anything that shows up. Now, I would be very embarrassed if a tape actually showed up, saying something like that. It would be double embarrassed because Im saying there is no tape. There is no event. I was never even in that room for that period of time.
---------
What period of time?
How do you even define "that period of time" if nothing happened during "that period of time"?
IIRC there is no consensus when the golden shower incident happened, only that if it happened then it must have happened during Trump's 2013 stay in Moscow.
Is Trump saying that he wasn't in that suite of the Ritz Carlton during that stay?
BSdetect
(8,999 posts)All his claims are obvious lies to me.'
He is full of shit. Period.
iluvtennis
(19,891 posts)Alice11111
(5,730 posts)As he said, he could shoot someone.... His hypocritical ignorant followers believe his lies, even if he contradicts himself mid sentence.
If they produce the tape, his sycophants will say it's fake, just like the sexual predator tape.
TheBlackAdder
(28,237 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 18, 2017, 12:37 PM - Edit history (1)
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)is (nor a "scat fest" for that matter). Egads, were that Mark Twain were alive now!
7962
(11,841 posts)B & D is bondage & domination
madokie
(51,076 posts)and an ignoramus to boot
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,224 posts)Putin never showed. But the pageant went off smoothly, crowning 25-year-old Gabriela Isler of Venezuela before what NBC claims was a worldwide audience of 1 billion. (To the disappointment of some LGBT activists, no mention was made of the anti-gay law.) After the contest, Trump attended a vodka-infused 1 a.m. afterparty at which ticket holders were promised a meeting with the New Yorker, along with the pageant contestants.
He also met with the Agalarovs to talk business.
bdamomma
(63,941 posts)it says June 19th and when did he actually stay in that hotel, could we catch him lying again?
Thanks Tommy.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028489259#post5
it is post 4 to read
Initech
(100,118 posts)uponit7771
(90,370 posts)... data the Russians have on MiniPoot is way bigger than some pissing vids people.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,858 posts)than such a thing actually happening.
Theres never going to be a tape that shows up. Theres never going to be anything that shows up. Now, I would be very embarrassed if a tape actually showed up, saying something like that. It would be double embarrassed because Im saying there is no tape.
DK504
(3,847 posts)IF there's a tape, but my boyfriend Pootie Poots said he's never release it. So there my peeps.
Ligyron
(7,640 posts)Phoenix61
(17,023 posts)He said it wouldn't show up which implies there is a tape. Classic lie, close to the truth, provides too many details and details that are not relevant.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)WTF does that mean? "I'd be double embarrassed if a non-existent tape showed up"?
I keep waiting to wake up from this nightmare.
Baitball Blogger
(46,775 posts)Without the tape this becomes another example of political mudslinging.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Ok, I went to the doc yesterday but it never happened b/c I don't have a tape of it? Really?
kairos12
(12,891 posts)VOX
(22,976 posts)Think he's worried about a damning TAPE???
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)remember puppet puppet puppet
ProfessorPlum
(11,279 posts)Also, what the hell? Instead of saying "it never happened", he says "the tape will never show up"? Talk about incriminating himself.
Botany
(70,627 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,758 posts)Grammy23
(5,815 posts)He is way too shrewd to get caught on tape. (Wink wink). He told us at his last press conference that he knows all about hidden cameras and that he warns people not to do naughty stuff in foreign countries because it may be taped to be used against them. And he is just waaayyyy too savvy to get caught on tape. "Buh-leave me. "
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,858 posts)it didn't happen, and little else, not that they were careful about hidden cameras!
Augiedog
(2,549 posts)He is saying he did it but you (we) can't prove it. If there is a video it WILL be released. Just a matter of time and someone's idea of opportunity. If I was in possession of the the tape I would release it while he is taking the oath. But that's me and when it comes to disgusting politicians tRump, dickless Chaney and Ayn Rand Ryan have coming whatever karma serves them.
Bozvotros
(786 posts)It is in mp4 on a USB drive on Putin's keychain.
Ligyron
(7,640 posts)He'd be embarrassed if a tape showed up? What tape? The one that doesn't exist?
That's an admission of guilt right there.
OTOH, I'd be surprised if it ever shows up too.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)"showers." The mind works, as God, in mysterious ways.
"Show(s)(ed)" up 4 times + "tape"/"if a tape"/"I'm saying...no tape" 3 ---> 7 NON-denials.
His statement was a message to Putin: DESTROY ALL TAPES.
Hekate
(90,928 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Turbineguy
(37,386 posts)"I'm not guilty and I won't do it again."
Historic NY
(37,457 posts)this story keeps leaking out in drips and drabs.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)politicat
(9,808 posts)That didn't happen.
And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
And if it was, that's not a big deal.
And if it is, that's not my fault.
And if it was, I didn't mean it.
And if I did,
You deserved it.
This is the thought process. Every time, this is how he will deflect and obfuscate and lie and gaslight.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)Perfectly describes the P Elect.
politicat
(9,808 posts)That's where I saw it first, years back.
Seriously, if you don't know someone raised by a narcissist... well, actually, you probably do, but they don't talk about it because growing up with a narcissist is a level of the special hell. And now you do. Hi!
Almost all of the coping techniques for dealing with a personality disordered parent apply to Cheeto Pissolini. Never believe anything they say. Document everything. Always get it in writing, explicitly. Disengage from the direct behavior as much as possible; ignore the words, pay attention to the policy; when forced to interact, either go as passive-aggressive and unresponsive as possible (Grey Rock), or go on the attack and mock, belittle and dismiss. Narcissists cannot bear the idea that the puppets (i.e. All of us) don't worship them. They thrive on attention -- good or bad, they don't care, it's all just fuel. Depriving them of it whenever possible is the only long-term effective strategy, but when interaction and attention are required -- make them as uncomfortable as possible. And the strategies apply to the true-believers, as well. Don't reward them with attention. It's about the only mass strategy available.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)Sorry you had to deal with that. Even if there were an instruction manual, you'd have been too young to read it as soon as you needed it.
I'll take your word that they're good techniques, but the problem with using them on (I love this name!) Pissolini, is that even if we employ them, his adoring masses will not. They will continue to fuel his disorder. I expect he'll get worse and worse as time goes on.
politicat
(9,808 posts)Most of them don't have disordered personalities -- they're just enthusiasts. They're social creatures, they want approval from their fellow humans. So when they do or say something approving of Orange Julius Caesar, don't react. Just give them a blank, disapproving, disgusted look and several seconds of awkward, uncomfortable silence, before pointedly changing the subject.
Here's how approval or disapproval works in the brain -- our emotional signaling system works a lot faster than our reason, so when someone says "that sounded racist/that was really sexist/you're being homophobic" in response to an actual awful statement (or similar, negative, spoken disapproval), the emotional core processes "They said I'm bad, I am not bad person, therefore they're being mean to me" faster than the reasoning capacity can play back the tape, hear the problem and process it. Since the emotion wins, the person who has just been accused gets defensive and combative. Which is why it's really important that we don't say what their bad behavior has been. If we let an awkward, uncomfortable silence with a contemptuous expression hang on for several seconds, that forces the person to replay their own mental tape without the emotional core getting dragged in, and makes them think it through. Telling someone they are a racist has a 1% chance of changing behavior. Telling them they sound like a racist has a 5% chance of changing behavior. Being cool, silent, and disdainful has a 50% chance of changing behavior over time.
Of course, this doesn't work with a narcissist, because their social shame sensors are defective, but most people aren't disordered.
Further, if someone is being consistently a problem -- and I include being a fascist as being a problem -- that person needs to be pushed out of polite society, excluded, dismissed and ignored. Any direct argument only reinforces their behavior, because of the emotional core process speed vs reason. So the emotional jujitsu is to make them think through their own behavior and come to the realization of their own problem for themselves... or at least isolate them to the point where the only people speaking and interacting with them are in their bubble.
I refuse to refer to Fool's Gold by his name, in part because it pisses him off.
If you haven't read the last few pages of the Simple Sabotage Field Manual -- that remains the gold standard for how to hack an organization. it's a good idea to read it anyway, because seeing those behaviors in our own organizations means there's a problem (intentional or not) that needs to be addressed, but knowing how to deploy them against others is useful. (The first 25 pages are pretty useless at this point, given surveillance and the difference in our manufacturing environment, though they can be useful for period fiction writers.) And those techniques work with just about anyone.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)into the topic of the Simple Sabotage Field Manual, so I'll put that off until I have the time to go there and back. Thanks for the tip.
Can't believe I'd never heard of it. Would have explained a lot of workplace situations I've personally experienced or heard about from family and friends!
Chakaconcarne
(2,474 posts)was just that I was having a bad day and the prostitute I was with was ugly and, well, things just weren't working down there for me... but the next night... oh boy!!! Uhhh... oops.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,572 posts)you respect the No Peeing zones."
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)You pee on the People!
Hekate
(90,928 posts)His lying is pathological, and knowing that any observer can follow the clues to the truth.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Denzil_DC
(7,287 posts)He's used the word "tape" numerous times in quick succession, as he usually does to reinforce his message.
So I guess there must be a tape.
Tell me more about this tape, Donny boy.
I'll be sure to look out for any more information about it now, since you've sensitized me the the word "tape."
(P.S. Tape?! How very 1980s, even in Russia!)
lark
(23,182 posts)Is he so very stupid that he actually believes Pootie gave him the original and didn't keep copies? That's what he seems to be saying. He's not saying he didn't do it, not even close. He's also saying he wasn't in "that" room for "that period of time". How odd. So he stayed in another room but went to that room for the "pee party"? Weirdest denial yet because it's yet another of the million (and growing) Drumpf lies.
central scrutinizer
(11,665 posts)Ergo - guilty
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)But I'm not so sure we can ascribe any meaning to his phraseology.
He's a very sloppy speaker. He's always just throwing words around. It works for him, too, as gives him deniability because even a language expert can't pin down exactly what he's said, because his sentences are structurally weak.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Alice11111
(5,730 posts)Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Did anyone ask him what time of day this golden shower supposedly happened? I haven't heard anyone really pontificate on the timing of the alleged incident. I think he is describing the period of time as a certain time of day, as opposed to how long some alleged event may have taken.
He has brought new evidence into the discussion.
It seems that he has decided to base his defense on "I wasn't even in the room at that time". I wonder when his best friend Pooty showed it to him.
rtracey
(2,062 posts)and the phrase "doth protest to much" ...theres a tape, and someone has it and either is holding it for ransom, or will release when this guy is in office.... either way.....