Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 10:31 AM Jan 2017

Frontline: Divided States of America - Did anyone else watch?

Two part PBS series, the first episode aired last night and finishes tonight.

Very informative programming, as usual.

The biggest takeaway IMHO was John McCain essentially giving birth to the tea party movement by dragging Sarah Palin out of the wilderness and into the national spotlight.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Frontline: Divided States of America - Did anyone else watch? (Original Post) TheCowsCameHome Jan 2017 OP
I couldn't bear it cilla4progress Jan 2017 #1
I don't think McCain realized TheCowsCameHome Jan 2017 #3
Watch Game Change, it's about just that issue Hamlette Jan 2017 #12
My son has HBO, so I'll check it out when I babysit on Thursday. LeftInTX Jan 2017 #15
Palin's awakening of the wingnut racist troglodytes begat Trump. HughBeaumont Jan 2017 #2
It's a failure of imagination cilla4progress Jan 2017 #4
I vote "just not willing to go there". HughBeaumont Jan 2017 #8
oh, yeah? What were we supposed to do? Hamlette Jan 2017 #13
I'd like to see EVERY Dem senator and congressperson cilla4progress Jan 2017 #14
It's surely on my DVR, but I haven't seen it yet. Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #5
The Teaparty would have happened with or without McCain. Did he "normalize" them? KittyWampus Jan 2017 #6
False equivalency much? kenfrequed Jan 2017 #17
It was both sad and fascinating eissa Jan 2017 #7
Watched the first hour, then changed to a serial killer movie milestogo Jan 2017 #9
Good one. cilla4progress Jan 2017 #10
We were already on that path long before Palin ended up as McCain's VP pick Lurks Often Jan 2017 #11
Yes. I watched part of it. Will finish watching this evening. LeftInTX Jan 2017 #16

cilla4progress

(24,726 posts)
1. I couldn't bear it
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 10:38 AM
Jan 2017

I'm sick of the rehashing. I probably should.

I agree with the Palin conclusion. Ironic because McCain is more or less one of the good Republicans. He definitely tapped into a recurring vile populist thread in America. Do you conclude he knew that when he picked her? I wonder if the pick was someone else on his team?

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
3. I don't think McCain realized
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 10:57 AM
Jan 2017

what would eventually happen to the party by bringing her to the forefront.

Why her? Other than because she was rather good looking woman who would appeal to a lot of males, I have no idea. It certainly wasn't her intellectual properties.

But look at the results of his action - everything changed.

Hamlette

(15,411 posts)
12. Watch Game Change, it's about just that issue
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 02:56 PM
Jan 2017

McCain wanted Lieberman but the party told him no. He went through the other possible VP picks with his top aids and they all decided none of them would be the game change they needed to win the election. In large part that was because he was doing poorly with women. So McCain said "find me a woman" They went through all the republican women they could and rejected them (some because they were pro choice!) and finally found Palin. There were a couple of people pushing her (not shown in the show but in the book) and she had hosted a stop on some GOP cruise and impressed some GOPers (also not in show) but she sounded good on paper. Remember Palin had an 80% approval rating in Alaska at the time and they did not know how stupid and mean she was until after the GOP convention.

The movie is great because it shows Steve Schmidt (sp?) and Nicole Wallace coming to terms with how awful she was. It starts with Steve being interviewed after the election and being asked "would you pick her again?" and the show is in flashback.

I can understand how they did it but they needed more vetting (only had 5 days). That being said, I remember when the news broke on the Internet. The first responses were "she looks great" but within about 24 hours the shit hit the fan (online) as people from Alaska (the 20%) started letting us know about how awful she was. Even moderate republicans turned on her early (I remember Andrew Sullivan chasing the "its not her baby" rumor for a long time).

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
2. Palin's awakening of the wingnut racist troglodytes begat Trump.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 10:44 AM
Jan 2017

It was a glacial avalanche that the Democrats did little to combat. They got bested by a party whose values and thinking are stuck in the 15th century.

cilla4progress

(24,726 posts)
4. It's a failure of imagination
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 11:01 AM
Jan 2017

Seems like Dem leadership is often caught flat-footed on the depths to which the right will stoop. Or just not willing to go there.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
8. I vote "just not willing to go there".
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 01:16 PM
Jan 2017

Sorry to tell the Democratic party, "Being the better person" will get you beat in a fight with a sociopath. Politics aren't fair. The leadership needs to figure this out and FAST, lest they want yet another REDMAP to happen.

Hamlette

(15,411 posts)
13. oh, yeah? What were we supposed to do?
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 03:00 PM
Jan 2017

Once Palin was picked we destroyed her and they lost. I admit she awakened the troglodytes but how could we have stopped that? We were not flat footed nor were we afraid to go there. They just don't give a shit. They love Trump because he is crude so the more we point out he is crude, the more people come to his cause. Same with Palin.

cilla4progress

(24,726 posts)
14. I'd like to see EVERY Dem senator and congressperson
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 03:08 PM
Jan 2017

take it to them, like Warren.

More than that, fight dirty.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
6. The Teaparty would have happened with or without McCain. Did he "normalize" them?
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 11:03 AM
Jan 2017

Perhaps.

But part of the same dynamics have and are happening on the Left.

Extremist ideologues on the Left who were legitimized by a 'mainstream' politician.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
17. False equivalency much?
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 03:20 PM
Jan 2017

Yeah... those extreme ideologues?

I haven't heard a lot of "workers of the world" speeches lately, nor have I heard anyone calling on workers to organize to smash the state and seize the means of production to be run collectively. Not a lot of violence being called upon by the left either.

At best The Left is asking for watered down versions of Canadian and Scandinavian policies.

So maybe you should quit it with the false equivalency a bit.

eissa

(4,238 posts)
7. It was both sad and fascinating
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 12:58 PM
Jan 2017

A great president could have been so much more if not for the unprecedented level of obstruction he faced.

P.S. Fuck Palin.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
11. We were already on that path long before Palin ended up as McCain's VP pick
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 02:38 PM
Jan 2017

as a country we grow farther and farther apart every year and condemning the ones you don't agree with isn't working and won't change the growing split in the country. Equally, neither side is going to embrace the other side.

I don't know what the future holds and I have no ideas on how to fix the divide.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Frontline: Divided States...