Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 03:49 AM Feb 2017

George Takei is on CNN talking about what FDR did to the Japanese including his family

It was a powerful discussion. He says Trump reminds him of that time. If "progressives" want democrats to go back to the time of FDR... I want NO part of it and will fight it in every way I can.

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
George Takei is on CNN talking about what FDR did to the Japanese including his family (Original Post) fun n serious Feb 2017 OP
Let's not forget what FDR did to the Americans HoneyBadger Feb 2017 #1
Indeed. fun n serious Feb 2017 #2
I'm uncomfortable with your reference... FarPoint Feb 2017 #3
It was wrong no matter what era. fun n serious Feb 2017 #4
Post removed Post removed Feb 2017 #30
He turned away 200k Jews.. Lets not be like repukes and ignore facts. fun n serious Feb 2017 #5
Yes learn from history.... FarPoint Feb 2017 #6
Yes. FDR did many great things but he also made many mistakes. fun n serious Feb 2017 #7
Winning World War ll, ending the Great Depression, and creating the safety net is mediocre? DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2017 #13
Your metrics certainly validate your narrative LanternWaste Feb 2017 #39
Nothing is ever simple. Trying to save a nation from collapse takes uncommon nerve and nikibatts Feb 2017 #8
That's a good point. fun n serious Feb 2017 #9
From what I understand he failed with taking Jews in and with the Jews in Europe... TrekLuver Feb 2017 #15
There is no doubt about it. fun n serious Feb 2017 #16
I don't know about him..I don't think he was it was the American People who were. He saw TrekLuver Feb 2017 #18
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2017 #23
FDR would have got into WW ll a lot sooner if it wasn't for the America Firsters. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2017 #38
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2017 #22
What would be wrong with speaking Japanese or German? fun n serious Feb 2017 #34
" What would be wrong with speaking Japanese or German? " DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2017 #36
FDR wasn't a white nationalist. He spoke of American ideals, not of a white race. DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2017 #35
You mean America first? fun n serious Feb 2017 #37
The America Firsters were led by the anti-semitic aviator, Charles Lindbergh, who... DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2017 #40
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2017 #31
Japanese-Americans weren't the only ones interned DeminPennswoods Feb 2017 #10
Also learned last night that there were some yuiyoshida Feb 2017 #12
There were just a handful of German Americans interned. NutmegYankee Feb 2017 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2017 #29
I see things much different than you do. fun n serious Feb 2017 #41
And that's an excellent thing! Rhiannon12866 Feb 2017 #47
"He assimilated" insinuating he was better? That others did not? I guess having Asian features Maru Kitteh Feb 2017 #46
"If "progressives" want democrats to go back to the time of FDR"... oh FFS phleshdef Feb 2017 #11
+ 1 million melman Feb 2017 #17
"I can't believe it's allowed." Really? BzaDem Feb 2017 #19
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2017 #24
Yes, and the presidents you speak of (70 years before FDR) are roundly criticized. BzaDem Feb 2017 #42
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2017 #26
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2017 #27
If you think anything we are doing now is comparable in scope BzaDem Feb 2017 #43
Well he can be trashed for Japanese internment. That is fair. phleshdef Feb 2017 #21
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2017 #28
Agreed. It's always odd to me when presidents are defined by one thing BannonsLiver Feb 2017 #20
Post removed Post removed Feb 2017 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2017 #32
We get it. You're better than us taught_me_patience Feb 2017 #44
You call George Takei a whiny BITCH, and then you demand he apologize to the Chinese Maru Kitteh Feb 2017 #45
Disgusting and unforgivable. egduj Feb 2017 #33

FarPoint

(12,437 posts)
3. I'm uncomfortable with your reference...
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 05:51 AM
Feb 2017

FDR was highly progressive for that ERA....It was what it was... Helped set the foundation for civil rights movement. We can learn from history as to not repeat what we know now as being unacceptable..That point is what George Taki was trying to make.

Response to fun n serious (Reply #4)

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
5. He turned away 200k Jews.. Lets not be like repukes and ignore facts.
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 06:03 AM
Feb 2017

Internment[edit]
Further information: Japanese American internment
Executive Order 9066, which sent 120,000 Japanese expatriates and American citizens of Japanese ancestry to be confined at internment camps, has been charged by critics as being racist. The Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality.

Treatment of Jesse Owens[edit]
After the 1936 Berlin Olympics, only the white athletes were invited to see and meet Roosevelt. No such invitation was made to the African American athletes such as Jesse Owens, who had won four gold medals. A widely believed myth about the 1936 games was that Hitler had snubbed Owens, something that never happened. Owens said, "Hitler didn't snub me--it was [Roosevelt] who snubbed me. The president didn't even send me a telegram."[47] However, Hitler had left after Owens's first gold medal win and did not meet him. Subsequently, he did not meet with any of the gold medalists. Owens lamented his treatment by Roosevelt, saying that he "wasn't invited to the White House to shake hands with the President."[48]

Hugo Black[edit]
When Roosevelt appointed Hugo Black to the Supreme Court he apparently did not know that Black had been a member of the Ku Klux Klan.[49]

Anti-lynching legislation[edit]
Roosevelt condemned lynching as murder but did not support Republican proposals to make it a federal crime, although his wife Eleanor did so. FDR told an advocate, "If I come out for the anti-lynching bill now, they [Southern Democratic senators] will block every bill I ask Congress to pass to keep America from collapsing. I just can't take that risk."[50]

Failure to do enough for the Jews of Europe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Franklin_D._Roosevelt#Accusations_of_racism

FarPoint

(12,437 posts)
6. Yes learn from history....
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 06:06 AM
Feb 2017

They did the best they could with in the boundaries of that ERA. ..No malice intended. Today, we understand it was unacceptable and why. Then, they did not understand.. To repeat the travesty as with tRump Mafia. Now that deserves the outrage.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
7. Yes. FDR did many great things but he also made many mistakes.
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 06:09 AM
Feb 2017

I would not call him a great president. More mediocre.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
13. Winning World War ll, ending the Great Depression, and creating the safety net is mediocre?
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 12:13 AM
Feb 2017

Along with George Washington and Abraham Lincoln he is one of the three most consequential presidents ever.

Did he makes mistakes? Of course, but they need to be evaluated in light of his entire record.



 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
39. Your metrics certainly validate your narrative
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 10:12 AM
Feb 2017

Your silent metrics certainly validate your narrative, regardless of any objectivity they may lack.

 

nikibatts

(2,198 posts)
8. Nothing is ever simple. Trying to save a nation from collapse takes uncommon nerve and
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 06:13 AM
Feb 2017

stamina. Less than perfect decisions and choice must be made. Unless you walk in those shoes and carry the weight of a nation on your shoulders we should not rely on the nobility of hindsight to condemn the actions of people trying to do good for as many as possible. Barack Obama faced the like dilemma of going for the good of many in the face of fighting for the perfect for a few. Bill Clinton faced much the same.

History always condemns the good that fails to usher in the perfect.

 

TrekLuver

(2,573 posts)
15. From what I understand he failed with taking Jews in and with the Jews in Europe...
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 12:42 AM
Feb 2017

because of populism at home. The good old American people wanted no part of that war...or it's "problems"... While Britain was getting bombed to shit...and Churchill & the English were literally dying for help... America didn't want to get involved. Good old populism is to blame for that. And looks at what's happening now...we've come on round back again but now it's Muslims.

The internment without question is the biggest stain on his Presidency. Please let me know which President was perfect. He did pretty damn well considering the times.

 

TrekLuver

(2,573 posts)
18. I don't know about him..I don't think he was it was the American People who were. He saw
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 01:10 AM
Feb 2017

the dangers of what the hell was going on with the Axis but public sentiment was really against getting involved.

He's ranked as the 3rd greatest President and for good reason. I'm sorry you think so poorly of him. He did a lot more good than bad and like I said no President is perfect. It's important to remember the mistakes...but these mistakes don't define him.

Response to TrekLuver (Reply #18)

Response to fun n serious (Reply #16)

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
34. What would be wrong with speaking Japanese or German?
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 10:05 AM
Feb 2017

I don't have a republican bone in my body! I have a hatred for nationalist given the current climate. I am a proud globalist. I believe in globalization and strongly believe the people who do not will be indeed "left behind."

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
35. FDR wasn't a white nationalist. He spoke of American ideals, not of a white race.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 10:09 AM
Feb 2017

White nationalism is patriotism predicated on blood and soil. Patriotism is based on shared ideals.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
40. The America Firsters were led by the anti-semitic aviator, Charles Lindbergh, who...
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 10:13 AM
Feb 2017

The America Firsters were led by the anti-semitic aviator, Charles Lindbergh, who spoke glowingly of Hitler and opposed U S intervention in WW ll. He changed his tune after Pearl Harbor.

Response to fun n serious (Reply #5)

DeminPennswoods

(15,290 posts)
10. Japanese-Americans weren't the only ones interned
Mon Feb 20, 2017, 06:35 AM
Feb 2017

Years ago Terry Gross (Fresh Air) interviewed author Lisa Scottoline about her then latest book, "Killer Smile". Scottoline said the plot came about after she was going through things from her deceased grandparents. She said they kept virtually nothing so she found it odd that one of the few things they'd kept were their immigration papers. That lead her to research and find that during WWII, many Italians were also sent to internment camps (in Montana, iirc) and that the FBI often conducted raids in Italian communities during the middle of night, terrifying them. The justification for the raids and round ups was that Italians living along the east coast might be sending signals (by light, iirc) to enemy ships.

yuiyoshida

(41,861 posts)
12. Also learned last night that there were some
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 12:12 AM
Feb 2017

Taiwanese and Koreans interned and they never dropped bombs on anyone.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
14. There were just a handful of German Americans interned.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 12:23 AM
Feb 2017

I imagine that knowledge of how they had reacted to the last world war and the logistics prevented any mass internment efforts. I say logistics because German Americans are the largest ancestry in the United States, both in 1940 and 2010, and there is a "German belt" from Eastern PA all the way across to Oregon. From 1820-1870, so many Germans came to the US that the countries population doubled.

Given that 1/6th of the country was German, FDR's hand was fixed on that front.

Response to DeminPennswoods (Reply #10)

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
41. I see things much different than you do.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 10:24 AM
Feb 2017

I believe it was FDR's Executive Order 9066 that made your grandfather fearful of speaking Italian. It's a crying shame. I can not defend it. I will not. I agree FDR did many great things but the bad things were real bad. I am USA born but English is not my first language. I speak 3 languages in my home daily, always have. I teach my kids to do the same.

Rhiannon12866

(206,006 posts)
47. And that's an excellent thing!
Wed Feb 22, 2017, 05:32 AM
Feb 2017

In this increasingly global world, it's a definite advantage to speak more than one language. My mother was Polish, though she was born here, but Polish was her first language and she was fluent, actually went to special classes when she was a kid so she could learn to read and write it, too. I've often regretted that she didn't pass it on to my brother and me.

In other countries, speaking more than one language is more common than not. Children are taught languages in the grades while here it's not considered a priority. I took five years of French, but not having the chance to practice, I've lost most of it. As Americans, we tend to assume that everyone can speak English - and we're usually right.

Maru Kitteh

(28,342 posts)
46. "He assimilated" insinuating he was better? That others did not? I guess having Asian features
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 03:00 PM
Feb 2017

Black hair, brown eyes and brown skin had nothing to do with it right?

In another post you say that if it were not for the very kind, benevolent actions of FDR for rounding up all the Japanese and putting them in camps they surely ALL would have been lynched!

So which is it? Was gramps some kind of superior being because "he assimilated?' or maybe did he have the choice of trying to "pass" while others did not.



 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
11. "If "progressives" want democrats to go back to the time of FDR"... oh FFS
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 12:04 AM
Feb 2017

We want to go back to the economic / social safety net mindset of FDR and you KNOW thats what progressives mean.

What FDR did to the Japanese Americans was a horrendous stain on his legacy.

But if you don't want to go back to the following, you aren't worth a damn:

FDR's Second Bill of Rights:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
17. + 1 million
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 12:56 AM
Feb 2017

FDR is the greatest Democratic president of all time. To see this icon trashed here is unbelievable. I can't believe it's allowed.

BzaDem

(11,142 posts)
19. "I can't believe it's allowed." Really?
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 01:37 AM
Feb 2017

FDR permitted an entire race of American Citizens to be imprisoned in detention camps, solely on the basis of their race. And you are saying that you can't believe criticizing him for that is allowed?

One can celebrate a president's actions when they deserve to be celebrated, and criticize a president's actions when they deserve to be criticized.

Response to BzaDem (Reply #19)

BzaDem

(11,142 posts)
42. Yes, and the presidents you speak of (70 years before FDR) are roundly criticized.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 12:25 PM
Feb 2017

Funny how only FDR seems exempt from such criticism.

Response to BzaDem (Reply #19)

Response to BzaDem (Reply #19)

BzaDem

(11,142 posts)
43. If you think anything we are doing now is comparable in scope
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 12:29 PM
Feb 2017

then a common factual basis for us to continue the discussion is not present.

Have a nice day.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
21. Well he can be trashed for Japanese internment. That is fair.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 04:08 AM
Feb 2017

But defining him by it and using it as an excuse to turn away from his social safety net legacy is just dumb.

Response to melman (Reply #17)

BannonsLiver

(16,448 posts)
20. Agreed. It's always odd to me when presidents are defined by one thing
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 04:04 AM
Feb 2017

Presidencies are complex. We have the benefit of 75 years of hindsight. In the 1940's intelligence was in the stone ages. There were no satellites. Radar was in its infancy. FDR was operating under the assumption that the Japanese had eyes on attacking the west coast. There were fears that they could pull off another Pearl Harbor with the aid of spies already in the United States.

Those fears may appear overdone now, but I bet they didn't seem that way in real time. This in no way excuses internment. It's meant to add context. Takei has a damned good reason to hate FDR just as anyone would who lived through such a brutally unfair experience.

But I happen to love FDR for all of the other good stuff he did, like getting the country through the depression and defeating tyranny, among many other things. And all from a wheelchair.

Response to fun n serious (Original post)

Response to fun n serious (Original post)

Maru Kitteh

(28,342 posts)
45. You call George Takei a whiny BITCH, and then you demand he apologize to the Chinese
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 02:41 PM
Feb 2017

and other Asians on behalf of Japan?

You do realize he is an AMERICAN right?

Just where is your claim to moral high ground against racism and misogyny? Because those are some outrageously racist, misogynistic statements you just set out there.

And then there's this nice statement you made in this thread:

Some people are ruled by spite. He did not save every Jew and interred some Japanese? Guess what, if he had not there is a very good chance they would have all been lynched.


George Takei is ruled by spite? Yes, of course. How dare he speak up about his unconstitutional detainment that the benevolent, kind, white government awarded him for his own good, the good of his family and everyone who looked like him?

I guess it's not that hard to figure out how we ended up with racist internment camps in this country after all.





egduj

(805 posts)
33. Disgusting and unforgivable.
Tue Feb 21, 2017, 08:39 AM
Feb 2017

Saying he needed to get his "hands dirty" doesn't excuse these despicable actions.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»George Takei is on CNN ta...