Ivanka Trump tweeted that our houses of worship must be protected but

[riversedge]

when I went to copy and paste-it was no longer there!
Deleted! Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!

You can search Twitter using the search box below or return to the homepage.




Maggie H had commented:

Link to tweet

[pkdu]

1. apparently she typed "God Bless American" nt

[dewsgirl]

2. Have none of these people heard of spell check?

[riversedge]

7. umm. I read it quickly but do not think that phase was in the tweet.

[pkdu]

10. many comments to Maggie Haberman retweet like this one..

@maggienyt @portlandmercury Now, we’re the nation of American? When did this happen?

[Louis1895]

3. Is this what you are looking for?

Link to tweet

[BeckyDem]

4. She is talking about banks.

[pkdu]

5. Lol - good one. nt

[lunasun]

6. +1 She is just pushing tolerance to remove Dodd-Frank act

[Behind the Aegis]

16. Not funny.

There was NO reason to mention banks. NONE!

[BeckyDem]

18. Of course there was, Trump and his kids are only interested in their brand of merchandise.

Money is the only interest Trump worships, not people, that is their religion, banks represents that more accurately.
That you can't see the hypocrisy of her declaring places of worship to be protected while their enterprises have ripped people off for money is interesting.

[Behind the Aegis]

19. What's really interesting...

...is that you can't see the bigotry, in a thread about anti-Semitism, you are accusing a Jewish woman of being more concerned about money and not anti-Semitism.

[BeckyDem]

20. No, that's not what occured. Your non-sequitor is just that, a non-sequitor.

She is a fraud and hypocrite, money is what she and her fathers administration is about, not keeping any place of worship safe. If she cared about her faith, she would call out her father and his friend Bannon. Money is her interest, and a bank is that representative, thus my comment.

[Behind the Aegis]

21. Your's is the non-sequitor.

The topic: condemnation of anti-Semitism
Your non-sequitur: Ivanka's love of money

[KittyWampus]

22. She worships money. That was at the intent.

[Behind the Aegis]

23. And saying it in this context is anti-Semitic.

Intent or not.

[Beartracks]

28. So Jesus was an anti-Semite...

... when he threw the money-changers out of the Temple. Because they were Jews, he was wrong to harangue them for their love of money, and in that context he was being anti-Semitic, intent or not.

Right...

=================

[Behind the Aegis]

29. BWHAHAHAHA!

Classic!

[BeckyDem]

24. She has no condemnation of substance, none. Over looking her ability to condemn her father and

Bannon is a choice she made. Her words and deeds are empty. That you find her sincere is unfortunate.

[Behind the Aegis]

25. I never said I find her sincere.

What is unfortunate, is the use of an ancient, and I do mean ancient, anti-Semitic slur about Jews loving money above all else.

[BeckyDem]

27. That is a stretch on your part and without merit.

We are talking about her and only her. She has no credibility due to her own interests, money. That she is Jewish and speaking about places of worship only highlights her hypocrisy. An administration her father with her blessing and help may be the worst thing that ever happened to Jewish people in my life time.

[Behind the Aegis]

30. The stretch is on YOUR part.

The topic: anti-Semitism
The non-sequitur: Her love of money

Had she made a comment about anti-Semitism out of context, then fine, claim she loves money. If she made a comment about the poor of Africa were her concern, then fine claim she loves money. But, in this context, your comment is inappropriate, but highly predictable.

[BeckyDem]

31. No, you have baseless claims, and a desire, evidently, to imagine her history and all her

help with her father winning the presidency should be ignored. YOU are off base. She is a hypocrite, that you do not see it in her statements is on you.

[Hortensis]

33. Becky, you may done it completely cluelessly, but when you

accused a Jew of regarding banks as places of worship you advanced a rabidly antisemitic theme, one so common that most people reading it would immediately recognize it as an iteration of this ancient slur on an entire people.

Imo, understanding how well received it would be by, for instance, typical Breitbart and other antisemitic readers, should apologize and remove it.

[Sissyk]

34. +1000

Thanks, Hortensis!

[BeckyDem]

35. No, you're ignoring her history, her intent. She is a hypocrite who has helped advanced a

white supremacist. She has no interest but to continue to profit from her fathers position. Pointing out her intentions, which are not to safe guard anyone in any place of worship is why she needs to be called out, her religion is irrelevant. I am well aware of the meaning of anti-Semitism, well aware she is in fact Jewish, that doesn't change her enabling a racist. She did not have to campaign for him, she lies every time she opens her mouth. Every time she said her father was not a sexist pig, and most especially with his friend and advisor, Bannon. Adult children have abandoned their parent for a lot less. You're suggesting her history and intent be ignored, she gets no pass from me.

[Hortensis]

37. You're ignoring your own behavior. Whatever you intended

it to mean, at best you posted a double entendre, and one of the messages was extremely offensive. Certainly everyone wishing to give you all benefit of the doubt would see it that way, with you initially understanding only one and, unfortunately, later refusing to admit the other when pointed out.

I repeat, it doesn't belong here on DU, and I believe you owe DU an apology for, if nothing else, not removing it...yesterday. (!)

[BeckyDem]

38. I owe you an apology? You have that backwards. What you are saying is, ignore the fact she

is insincere about her desire to safe guard any place of worship and will continue to profit from a father she should condemn because of her religion/ethnicity but she has not and likely never will. You are barking up the wrong tree, you don't ignore what she does due to her religion, she is a hypocrite. Ivanka and her entire family are about self promotion and brand recognition for Trump for profit.

[Kimchijeon]

36. Ahhahaha !

Makes more sense, then. LOL

[riversedge]

8. Yes, that is the one. Perhaps it was a tweeter technical clitch. thanks

[Princess Turandot]

11. She reposted the tweet; the one you referenced *was* deleted...

perhaps for a spelling error!

[chowder66]

13. Ding Ding Ding!!!

Someone captured it. She wrote American instead of America.

http://forward.com/sisterhood/363694/ivanka-tweets-reaction-to-jcc-threats/

[muriel_volestrangler]

9. She should try asking her father's twitter account that reporter's question

and see if he tells her to shut up, and that it's outrageous that someone thinks he's anti-semitic.

[Princess Turandot]

12. She's getting a lot of on-point push back in the replies...

if you click on the tweet, you can read them. Numerous 'tell that to your father' and asking her if she's oblivious to irony.

The Trumpeteers are fighting back with references to bad mooslims who hate America, and (sigh) Robert Byrd.

Link to tweet

[Cha]

15. 'tell that to your father' and asking her if she's oblivious to irony."

Really.. that's key.

[riversedge]

14. Most tweets are knocking it to Ivanka-not giving her any slack....

HOMEFRONT HUGS USA ?@HomefrontHugs 44m44 minutes ago

@IvankaTrump your father needs to speak out now before things get worse and use the names of victims - JEWS. Enough is enough .

Link to tweet

Andi Zeisler ?@andizeisler 10m10 minutes ago

@IvankaTrump
2 replies 3 retweets 23 likes





Maureen Shaw ?@MaureenShaw 5m5 minutes ago

@andizeisler this. Is. Perfect. Bwahahaha

[Behind the Aegis]

17. The don't need to be protected, but they do need to be left alone.

This shit has to stop!

[coco22]

26. What did she say..

when black churches and mosques were burned?