Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTraffic deaths have red state-blue state divide
November's presidential contest was bizarre in many ways, but there is one peculiarity that pundits haven't pounced on: The states with the worst rates of traffic deaths in the country went solidly for Donald Trump while Hillary Clinton swept states with the lowest fatality rates.
That odd association between traffic deaths and how states voted echoes what happened just over four years ago, when this red-blue divide first came to light. As FairWarning reported in 2012, low fatality states voted blue to re-elect President Obama, while states with higher death rates went for GOP challenger Mitt Romney.
This November's presidential voting reshuffled the deck somewhat. Six states that were Obama blue in 2012 turned red in 2016, delivering a victory to the GOP's Trump. Yet the correlation between traffic death rates and presidential voting actually appears slightly stronger.
http://www.timesunion.com/tuplus-local/article/Traffic-deaths-have-red-state-blue-state-divide-10898946.php?cmpid=123
I'll refrain from speculating, but a well-known line from the movie Animal House immediately came to mind.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 733 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Traffic deaths have red state-blue state divide (Original Post)
djg21
Feb 2017
OP
CrispyQ
(36,447 posts)1. "Don't drive angry!"
A lot of them are very angry. Angry at the wrong people, but angry, still.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)2. Mandatory Drivers Ed doesn't exist in TN,
And people don't have the money for private lessons.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)3. Might not spending on transit systems be the actual variable here?
I have not looked into it but it seems reasonable to assume that states which skew (D) would spend more on infrastructure such as transit while states which skew (R) would spend less.
P.S. Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?
djg21
(1,803 posts)6. The article . . .
Attributes the varying fatalities rates to the urban/rural divide, and ponders whether there ar more fatalities because people tend to drive faster on rural roads than people on more conceited city streets can. I'm sure this is one variable, but I have suspicions that there are other factors involved. I'd like to see statistics as to how many traffic fatalities in the various states involved alcohol or other substances.
Johnny2X2X
(19,029 posts)4. Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life son.
Let's call it what it is, deep red states are basically hell holes bordering on 3rd world territory.
djg21
(1,803 posts)7. You read my mind. ;-)
njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)5. That's interesting,thanks
SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)8. That extrapolates to almost all state statistics
Blue states generally have higher positives(income, education) and lower negatives(deaths, crime rates) while the opposite is true of red states.