Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

djg21

(1,803 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 01:57 PM Feb 2017

Traffic deaths have red state-blue state divide

November's presidential contest was bizarre in many ways, but there is one peculiarity that pundits haven't pounced on: The states with the worst rates of traffic deaths in the country went solidly for Donald Trump while Hillary Clinton swept states with the lowest fatality rates.

That odd association between traffic deaths and how states voted echoes what happened just over four years ago, when this red-blue divide first came to light. As FairWarning reported in 2012, low fatality states voted blue to re-elect President Obama, while states with higher death rates went for GOP challenger Mitt Romney.

This November's presidential voting reshuffled the deck somewhat. Six states that were Obama blue in 2012 turned red in 2016, delivering a victory to the GOP's Trump. Yet the correlation between traffic death rates and presidential voting actually appears slightly stronger.

http://www.timesunion.com/tuplus-local/article/Traffic-deaths-have-red-state-blue-state-divide-10898946.php?cmpid=123

I'll refrain from speculating, but a well-known line from the movie Animal House immediately came to mind.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Traffic deaths have red state-blue state divide (Original Post) djg21 Feb 2017 OP
"Don't drive angry!" CrispyQ Feb 2017 #1
Mandatory Drivers Ed doesn't exist in TN, Lars39 Feb 2017 #2
Might not spending on transit systems be the actual variable here? Motown_Johnny Feb 2017 #3
The article . . . djg21 Feb 2017 #6
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life son. Johnny2X2X Feb 2017 #4
You read my mind. ;-) djg21 Feb 2017 #7
That's interesting,thanks njhoneybadger Feb 2017 #5
That extrapolates to almost all state statistics SecularMotion Feb 2017 #8
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
3. Might not spending on transit systems be the actual variable here?
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 02:10 PM
Feb 2017

I have not looked into it but it seems reasonable to assume that states which skew (D) would spend more on infrastructure such as transit while states which skew (R) would spend less.




P.S. Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?


 

djg21

(1,803 posts)
6. The article . . .
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 02:24 PM
Feb 2017

Attributes the varying fatalities rates to the urban/rural divide, and ponders whether there ar more fatalities because people tend to drive faster on rural roads than people on more conceited city streets can. I'm sure this is one variable, but I have suspicions that there are other factors involved. I'd like to see statistics as to how many traffic fatalities in the various states involved alcohol or other substances.

Johnny2X2X

(19,029 posts)
4. Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life son.
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 02:13 PM
Feb 2017

Let's call it what it is, deep red states are basically hell holes bordering on 3rd world territory.

 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
8. That extrapolates to almost all state statistics
Thu Feb 23, 2017, 02:41 PM
Feb 2017

Blue states generally have higher positives(income, education) and lower negatives(deaths, crime rates) while the opposite is true of red states.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Traffic deaths have red s...