Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump: "I think we ought to go back to the first [ban], and go all the way.
Thats what I wanted to do in the first place.
Dude is deranged!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1423 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump: "I think we ought to go back to the first [ban], and go all the way. (Original Post)
Cattledog
Mar 2017
OP
What does that mean? Is this something he actually said? If so, do you have link? nt
tblue37
Mar 2017
#1
Thanks! That comment will be used to justify another stay on implementing the ban.
tblue37
Mar 2017
#7
Being generous, that may mean "appeal it all the way to the Supreme Court"
muriel_volestrangler
Mar 2017
#6
tblue37
(65,488 posts)1. What does that mean? Is this something he actually said? If so, do you have link? nt
Last edited Thu Mar 16, 2017, 03:12 PM - Edit history (1)
Cattledog
(5,919 posts)5. Link to quote
tblue37
(65,488 posts)7. Thanks! That comment will be used to justify another stay on implementing the ban.
He and Giuliani shoot themselves in the foot all the time because they just have to run their yappers.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)2. He might as well after his "it's just a watered down version of the first"
He's stupid enough to think he's smart
FSogol
(45,527 posts)3. Go all the way? Is Trumpy going to have a final solution?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)4. Trump will create a false flag in order to
get one of these suckers to be upheld.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)6. Being generous, that may mean "appeal it all the way to the Supreme Court"
which is how Politico has interpreted it:
"This is, in the opinion of many, an unprecedented judicial overreach....This ruling makes us look weak," the president declared before appearing to vow to take the issue to the Supreme Court. "This is a watered-down version of the first one....I think we should go back to the first one and go all the way which is what I wanted to do in the first place."
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-revised-travel-ban-judge-hearing-236086
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-revised-travel-ban-judge-hearing-236086
Though I'm sure they wouldn't try that before getting Gorsuch or a similar RWer appointed - I think the current SC would have a guaranteed 4 votes to reject his original ban, which is good enough to uphold a rejection in the 8 member court.