General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAdam Schiff is laying it all out on the table....he's got a 15-minute opening statement....
...bringing in Carter Page, Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Breitbart, wikileaks, Gucifer 2, emails, et. al. and all the involvement of the Russians in the campaign.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,227 posts)My fingers are crossed that Comey confirms this versus running interference.
Wounded Bear
(58,773 posts)put it all on record. Write it down. Get the video recordings.
Mars and Minerva
(369 posts)CincyDem
(6,418 posts)The fact that no republican is interrupting for some bull chit point of order...tells me this was well orchestrated and none of the committee members are hearing this opening statement for the first time.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,227 posts)But maybe down the road whenever Feinstein decides to retire.
BainsBane
(53,122 posts)superpatriotman
(6,254 posts)"I am unable to comment about an ongoing investigation."
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Because that statement in itself confirms there is an ongoing investigation.
mobeau69
(11,167 posts)flamingdem
(39,335 posts)Schiff:
Why did Putin do what he did in the summer of 2016? What else was happening?
1 reply 6 retweets 7 likes
Shareblue?Verified account @Shareblue 4m4 minutes ago
Schiff:
[walks through timeline of Trump campaign associates activities re Russia]
Page goes to meeting in Moscow w Trump campaign approval
1 reply 5 retweets 12 likes
Shareblue?Verified account @Shareblue 2m2 minutes ago
Schiff:
Page meeting with Rosneft exec, friend of Putin and former KGB
1 reply 5 retweets 5 likes
Shareblue?Verified account @Shareblue 1m1 minute ago
Schiff:
Page and Manafort meet with Russian Ambassador at GOP convention;
GOP platform changed favoring Russia
2 replies 7 retweets 4 likes
Shareblue?Verified account @Shareblue 52s52 seconds ago
Schiff:
Goes through Wikileaks involvement, Roger Stone's involvement, Trump's praise of Wikileaks and invitation to Russia to hack Clinton
0 replies 2 retweets 5 likes
George II
(67,782 posts)MineralMan
(146,350 posts)This is a very good summary of the collusion.
Satch59
(1,353 posts)Nunes is totally out of his league, hence his 5min opener...
A popcorn day...
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)Not fake news, Donnie.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)cilla4progress
(24,798 posts)Do you say this???
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)I feel that way
I think he will say if Obama did surveil Trump they had no knowledge
Orrex
(63,263 posts)That would make Comey look like he has no idea what's going on during his watch. Would he throw himself under the bus like that, simply for the sake of an after-the-fact zinger on Obama?
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)Orrex
(63,263 posts)This has never happened to me before!
You crack me up.
Blue_Roses
(12,894 posts)So that's done
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)or foreigner without many people in the intelligence community finding out about the effort. Plus, the President ordering such surveillance was made illegal 39 years ago. Why would Obama risk his reputation and prison to wiretap Trump. Trump lied about Obama ordering wiretaps, pure and simple.
True Blue American
(17,995 posts)No proof of wire tapping. Takes 3 to do that.
cilla4progress
(24,798 posts)I had trouble sleeping last night for this!
I bet he did too!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Hekate
(91,003 posts)Girard442
(6,088 posts)Girard442
(6,088 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)ismnotwasm
(42,023 posts)cilla4progress
(24,798 posts)what is Gowdy's point?
Again...leaks?
George II
(67,782 posts)....than the illegal contact itself.
cilla4progress
(24,798 posts)I suppose the deplorables still don't get it...
Duppers
(28,132 posts)hamsterjill
(15,224 posts)Gowdy trying to make Comey appear that he hasn't been taking the leaks seriously enough.
JohnnyLib2
(11,212 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)iluvtennis
(19,905 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)ananda
(28,895 posts).. that would be great!
But what does "investigation" mean. Well ..
.. for the Reeps who control Congress it means finding
and punishing leakers.
.. for the FBI I have no idea. I have this picture in my head
of agents pushing paper from one department to another
in some kind of vicious circle.
I hope that's just my overactive imagination, but I will only
believe it when I see it.
HAB911
(8,945 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....as being very quiet, unassuming and almost going through the motions. Damn, I was wrong!! He's being a bulldog this morning.
One other thing, he's going after Manafort mercilessly. Manafort is a resident of his neighboring district in Connecticut and more than rumors of "illegal activity".
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Amaryllis
(9,527 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)pronounced like it rhymes with Lucifer, or Gucci, the shoes?
mcar
(42,464 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,578 posts)But I don't think we have to expect quite that low a threshold of evidence, do we?
With a brief outline of each of the topics in the paragraph above, beginning at Carter Page, but perhaps not stopping at the end of it.... is there even a bit of doubt in anyone's mind that a DA could get an indictment against any defendant off the street?