Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(D) or (I) Bernie was the MAN on Rachel tonight! (Original Post) JoeOtterbein Mar 2017 OP
How are you going to get Medicare for all when we lost the WH and still_one Mar 2017 #1
If nobody talks about it - it will never happen... Talk Is Cheap Mar 2017 #3
It has and it is being talked about. Those who felt so inclined to still_one Mar 2017 #5
Can't keep blaming Bernie supporters, every last one voted for Hillary in the general FailureToCommunicate Mar 2017 #9
excuse me, where did I say anything about Bernie supporters? The ass Jill Stein is still_one Mar 2017 #10
Since the thread was about Bernie, I read into your comment as FailureToCommunicate Mar 2017 #12
i am upset with the green party. It is the loss in the Senate that made this a disaster still_one Mar 2017 #19
Were there Green Party candidates truebluegreen Mar 2017 #20
Indirectly. Hillary lost Michigan by .3%, Stein received 1.1% of the vote. Similar still_one Mar 2017 #23
So Stein wasn't running for Senator truebluegreen Mar 2017 #27
Yes she did. She undermined the Democratic party, by preaching to her followers that there still_one Mar 2017 #34
keep thinking that. truebluegreen Mar 2017 #36
No doubt. I'd totally pay higher taxes for single payer. PatrickforO Mar 2017 #25
People are already paying into Medicare and Social Security through their payroll taxes. still_one Mar 2017 #32
Don't apologize melman Mar 2017 #26
Yes, stillone was definitely talking about stein voters and I thank Cha Mar 2017 #39
By standing up for what we believe in. Like Single Payer. JoeOtterbein Mar 2017 #15
Simple. get both Houses of Congress and the WH back. mwooldri Mar 2017 #22
Sanders the statesman... Talk Is Cheap Mar 2017 #2
KICK! furtheradu Mar 2017 #4
Here: Bernie interview starts at 2:24mark Donkees Mar 2017 #6
Thank YOU! furtheradu Mar 2017 #7
He is inspirational. "This is a pivotal moment in American history. Either these guys get away with JudyM Mar 2017 #11
Thanks for posting this Donkees! JoeOtterbein Mar 2017 #13
He was criticizing the Democratic Party. LiberalFighter Mar 2017 #8
Democratic Party. n/t murielm99 Mar 2017 #14
I welcome criticizing if it wins us single payer JoeOtterbein Mar 2017 #16
The Democrat (sic) Party is perfect? truebluegreen Mar 2017 #21
The "Democrat" Party does not exist. The Wielding Truth Mar 2017 #28
It needs criticizing. alarimer Mar 2017 #42
Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2017 #17
Thanks Man! JoeOtterbein Mar 2017 #18
Fight is the key word. Always love Bernie's ideas and principles. NRaleighLiberal Mar 2017 #24
Yep! Fight because flight is not an option! JoeOtterbein Mar 2017 #30
I keep thinking----if only Doitnow Mar 2017 #29
If only what? Maru Kitteh Mar 2017 #31
Me, too. If only he'd conceded in early May, when the numbers made a win impossible, pnwmom Mar 2017 #33
Yep. joshcryer Mar 2017 #37
That was a good post. Thanks, joshcryer. We need to remember this in 2020. pnwmom Mar 2017 #38
Bernie is an inspiration. We're lucky we have him in these difficult times. jalan48 Mar 2017 #35
I'm grateful Bernie is still out there talking with voters about Medicare for all. democrank Mar 2017 #40
big deal Cane4Dems Mar 2017 #41
Those of us who follow Bernie know he hasn't stopped criticizing Twitler and his agenda. beam me up scottie Mar 2017 #43

still_one

(92,061 posts)
5. It has and it is being talked about. Those who felt so inclined to
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 09:48 PM
Mar 2017

vote third party though, insured that it will be quite a while before that door opens again.

The only way it will happen now if if the republicans actually wanted to help people, and that isn't in the cards

still_one

(92,061 posts)
10. excuse me, where did I say anything about Bernie supporters? The ass Jill Stein is
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 10:32 PM
Mar 2017

who I am talking about, and those who voted for Stein

FailureToCommunicate

(14,007 posts)
12. Since the thread was about Bernie, I read into your comment as
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 10:37 PM
Mar 2017

dissing voters that didn't vote for Hillary due to being disgruntled BOBs.

My apologies.

still_one

(92,061 posts)
19. i am upset with the green party. It is the loss in the Senate that made this a disaster
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 10:49 PM
Mar 2017

As an aside I called my Democratic Senators and representative, encouraging that now would be the time to push for Medicare for all. I even called Ryan's office, left a voice mail, saying if they really wanted to help people they would do Medicare for all.

In California there is a bill going through our state legislature to implement single payer. I would gladly pay higher taxes if necessary for that


still_one

(92,061 posts)
23. Indirectly. Hillary lost Michigan by .3%, Stein received 1.1% of the vote. Similar
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 11:17 PM
Mar 2017

results in Wisconsin and the other swing states.

It was that third party influence and undermining of the third party leadership, along with the other election shenanigans, like the FBI interference, that I believe discouraged those third party voters from voting in the down ticket races.



 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
27. So Stein wasn't running for Senator
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 11:31 PM
Mar 2017

but she cost us that seat, along with a few other factors.

Are you aware that self-identifying Democrats have dropped from a high of nearly 40% of voters in early 2009, to around 25% now? Republicans don't score any better. Independents meanwhile have climbed as high as 44%.

It's pretty obvious why Rs are unpopular (at least to us); why are we?

still_one

(92,061 posts)
34. Yes she did. She undermined the Democratic party, by preaching to her followers that there
Fri Mar 24, 2017, 12:19 AM
Mar 2017

was no difference between the two parties. It is similar to what Nader did in 2000, except it was worse this time

As to your point regarding less Democratic voters, there are a lot of factors for that. A big part that is the false equivalency that has been setup by the media for decades.

The fact is 47% didn't bother to vote. That has been pretty consistent through the years. Americans still have got it through their heads that elections have consequences.

Well they most certainly are going to feel the impact of it now

PatrickforO

(14,559 posts)
25. No doubt. I'd totally pay higher taxes for single payer.
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 11:28 PM
Mar 2017

Hell, I pay a GIANT tax right now! It's called 'PREMIUMS' and it costs me over $14,000 per year. AND, I 'enjoy' $30 copay for general treatment, $45 copay for a specialist appointment, even on the phone, and a WONDERFUL, financially crippling copay of $3K for hospitalization per year, per member of my family.

Yep...GREAT coverage.

And you know what? If we had fucking single payer, I wouldn't have to worry about anything. I'd just go, like they do in England, or Canada or Australia, and get treated.

This republican monstrosity does nothing but take. Those assholes don't give a rat's rear end about ANYBODY. The Freedom Caucus is a joke. Their shitty motto ought to be, "Yep, under our policies you're free to DIE if you can't PAY."

Gotta get the profit motive OUT of healthcare, period.

still_one

(92,061 posts)
32. People are already paying into Medicare and Social Security through their payroll taxes.
Fri Mar 24, 2017, 12:11 AM
Mar 2017

That essentially covers the current recipients. They still have to pay a premium for Medicare Part B, and that premium is determined according to income. There are still expenses not covered by Medicare, and those are covered by a supplemental or advantage plan, plus a drug plan. The drug plans and supplementals are up to the individual if they want the extra coverage.

If we had Medicare for all, as I see it, those who were under 65 would be able to buy into Medicare, and of course pay a premium for that right, but the amount of that extra premium would be offset by a younger, and presumably a healthier demographic. It would definitely be cheaper than buying insurance on the open market because there are more people in that pool.

For those who cannot afford the Medicare premium, they would need to be covered by Medicaid.

I personally believe that it is very doable, but I don't see it happening in this environment. We didn't have the votes in 2008. The blue dogs would not go for a public option or Medicare for all, and we needed every vote, since not one republican voted for it. We had a small window to pass something, or have nothing, and we got the ACA, which even with its deficiencies, is still superior to nothing.

Unfortunately, we are in a bad place where we may go back to where we were before the ACA.

Until people believe that healthcare is a right, I don't see how it will happen



Cha

(296,875 posts)
39. Yes, stillone was definitely talking about stein voters and I thank
Fri Mar 24, 2017, 03:20 AM
Mar 2017

you for your "apology" to him, FailureToCommunicate

mwooldri

(10,301 posts)
22. Simple. get both Houses of Congress and the WH back.
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 10:56 PM
Mar 2017

With a Medicare-for-All friendly admin and Congress.

JudyM

(29,204 posts)
11. He is inspirational. "This is a pivotal moment in American history. Either these guys get away with
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 10:32 PM
Mar 2017

what they're doing, and decimate our people, or else we stand up, fight back and transform the American society.

For those who don't have time to watch the clip, he implied that the Dems are going to go out to the red states in an attempt to educate folks about what's actually at stake here. He believes that if people rise up in opposition we can not only defeat the GOP bill, we can have single payer.

Thanks for posting this, Donkees!



LiberalFighter

(50,793 posts)
8. He was criticizing the Democratic Party.
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 10:29 PM
Mar 2017

Last edited Fri Mar 24, 2017, 08:58 AM - Edit history (1)

Corrected. Late and dealing with a high fever.

JoeOtterbein

(7,699 posts)
16. I welcome criticizing if it wins us single payer
Thu Mar 23, 2017, 10:43 PM
Mar 2017

Even if Obama (or Hillary & Bill) could not do it, does not mean WE cannot do Medicare for All.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
42. It needs criticizing.
Fri Mar 24, 2017, 01:34 PM
Mar 2017

Because it just isn't good enough. Nobody complained when they were rightly criticized for not standing up to Bush, back in the day, because they were completely spineless in the run-up to the Iraq war.

They do seem to have found a spine lately, at least most have. But they also have to push for policies that help everyone, that are not corporate giveaways. If they had pushed for a public option, we would be in a much different position now.

We could have used less welfare "reform" or drug wars (brought to us at least partially by Democrats).

So the right thing is to argue for universal health care (NOT universal insurance), even if we are many decades away from achieving it. Ultimately it is inevitable, because insurance will continued to be more and expensive until no one can afford it, but in the meantime people will still die and go broke, even with the ACA.


pnwmom

(108,959 posts)
33. Me, too. If only he'd conceded in early May, when the numbers made a win impossible,
Fri Mar 24, 2017, 12:13 AM
Mar 2017

and didn't let his young supporters spend two more months thinking he could overturn the results of the primary.

And if only he'd campaigned for Hillary before the two events in September, instead of working on that book.

He could have been so effective.

Oh well. If only.

pnwmom

(108,959 posts)
38. That was a good post. Thanks, joshcryer. We need to remember this in 2020.
Fri Mar 24, 2017, 02:17 AM
Mar 2017

Whoever is the nominee, it is vital that we all come together ASAP to support him or her.

democrank

(11,085 posts)
40. I'm grateful Bernie is still out there talking with voters about Medicare for all.
Fri Mar 24, 2017, 05:26 AM
Mar 2017

That's far better than sitting in Washington telling voters it just can't possibly happen. Bernie consistently draws a sizable crowd, no matter where he goes in the country. I believe that many who come to listen to him are (or could be) open to the idea of Medicare for all.

To my way of thinking, raising the issue of Medicare for all is what's important, not what initial the advocate of that policy has after his/her name.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
43. Those of us who follow Bernie know he hasn't stopped criticizing Twitler and his agenda.
Fri Mar 24, 2017, 06:56 PM
Mar 2017

Town halls, rallies, editorials, interviews, marching, his constant presence on social media - he's like the Energizer Bunny - he never stops.

He was as focused and passionate as ever on Rachel, I love watching angry Bernie take the piss out of Republicans.

More Americans are coming around on universal single payer health care, now is not the time to give up, we can fight to save the ACA and still remind people that health care should be a basic human right.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(D) or (I) Bernie was the...