Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP Health Bill Changes Could Kill Protections For Those With Pre-Existing Conditions
http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/03/23/521220359/gop-health-bill-changes-could-kill-protections-for-people-with-preexisting-conditionsWhen House Speaker Paul Ryan says he wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act so that people can buy insurance that's right for them, and not something created in Washington, part of what he's saying is that he wants to get rid of so-called essential health benefits.
That's a list of 10 general categories of medical care that all insurance policies are required to cover under the Affordable Care Act.
Getting rid of that requirement, or trimming it, is central to the Republican strategy, because they say those benefits drive up insurance premiums so much that healthy people won't buy coverage.
But if Republicans repeal that list, they essentially renege on a promise they've repeated over and over to voters, that they will protect people with pre-existing medical conditions.
"Protections for pre-existing conditions only work as long as plans have to cover the services you need because of your pre-existing condition," says Rodney Whitlock, a vice president at the consulting group ML Strategies who was a Republican staffer on the Senate Finance Committee when the Affordable Care Act was passed. "By repealing [essential health benefits], a plan may no longer have to cover those services, making the protection potentially meaningless."
That's because if insurance companies don't have a list of medical services they have to include in their policies, they can sell stripped-down policies and then charge extra for specific types of coverage. more...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1444 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP Health Bill Changes Could Kill Protections For Those With Pre-Existing Conditions (Original Post)
wordpix
Mar 2017
OP
Ryan is having multiple orgasms at the very thought of killing thousands of the poor
Eliot Rosewater
Mar 2017
#1
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)1. Ryan is having multiple orgasms at the very thought of killing thousands of the poor
and making millions of us homeless.
Some of the people he will kill, will still want to vote for him.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)3. a friend said he's a Xtian---true?
If so, we should bombard him w/tweets and FB posts about his "charity" work.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)5. Christ would have to
slap the shit out of this little fucking punk
Am I the only one who realizes he is trying to kill me?
Some others better start realizing and reacting accordingly.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)2. That would produce the ultimate damage to people. Of course, GOPers are fine with that.
dalton99a
(81,468 posts)4. Kick.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)6. Why bother having Insurance..you pay, you get nothing..
Imagine if everyone cancels policies.....then what - seems to me that is exactly what the feds are doing...and saying...you pay, you still get no coverage..why bother having ins. at all!!!!
-