Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorro

(15,740 posts)
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 10:29 PM Jan 2015

US says 'no' to handing Guantanamo back to Cuba

Source: AFP

Efforts to improve ties with Cuba will not extend to handing control of Guantanamo Bay back to Havana, the White House said on Thursday.

"The president does believe that the prison at Guantanamo Bay should be closed down," said White House spokesman Josh Earnest. "But the naval base is not something that we wish to be closed."

The base, on Cuba's southeastern tip, is currently the site of a large naval base as well as a deeply controversial prison used to detain terror suspects without trial.

Cuban President Raul Castro on Wednesday said handing back control of the 45 square mile (116 square kilometer) site was a precondition for normalizing ties with the United States.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/us-says-no-handing-guantanamo-back-cuba-201916697.html

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
1. There it is...
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 10:37 PM
Jan 2015

A hundred years ago, we coerced the Cuban Government to give us a virtually-unlimited "lease", and we, apparently, cannot let it go, despite better options regarding base placement and how it affects national security...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban%E2%80%93American_Treaty

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
2. Thought just the same. There it is.
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 10:45 PM
Jan 2015

Why though?
Why can we not just go home?
Why must we continue to occupy land in other countries?

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
5. The US Military love Guantanamo, due to its isolation.
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 11:53 PM
Jan 2015

Yes, the US has more isolated bases, Thule in Northern Greenland was considered the worse base (and to be sent they was viewed by many as some sort of punishment, i.e "who did you offend, and you were RIGHT and get them mad at you to be posted at Thule?", Officially Thule was NOT a punishment post, unofficially many people thought it was, especially for Officers,

Back to Guantanamo. It is the only US base that people on the base can NOT go into the town next to it. Everything is on base, if you want to go off base you have to fly to Florida. At the same time it is NOT US Soil, so US laws, outside of Military law, does not apply (Thus the massive resistance in the Courts to rule the long detention without a trial violates the US Constitution, the courts have ruled the application of the US Constitution outside the US is limited, and there have ruled the right to a speedy trial really does not apply to someone held in Guantanamo.).

Thus the US Military LOVES Guantanamo, the nearest non-Cuban area is Haiti, a place most people do NOT want to go to. In Guantanamo you are completely isolated from the rest of Society, even Michael Moore was threaten with hostile action as he sailed near Guantanamo (See Moore's Movie "SICKO" for the incident).

Thus the US loves Guantanamo for it is the most isolated US base (other then in the arctic and antarctic) in the world.

Response to Cooley Hurd (Reply #1)

MADem

(135,425 posts)
12. Better options? Not from a cost-benefit analysis....
Fri Jan 30, 2015, 02:20 AM
Jan 2015

I'm not getting into the whole "right or wrong" stuff, but from a practical standpoint, Gitmo is convenient, it's OFFSHORE (no "US rules" that can interfere with management, no minimum wage considerations for foreign nationals--Jamaicans, often as not--who are making good money from their POV), it has a well developed infrastructure, and it's compact. Oh, and it's built.

Again--I'm not talking about moral conversations, but practically speaking, Gitmo is a lot of bang for our buck, and close, too.



 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
8. Yeah, some pittance... Which they don't even accept, but...
Fri Jan 30, 2015, 12:18 AM
Jan 2015

... It's not really about that. It just a political symbol more than anything.

At least until Camp X-Ray.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
7. The Cubans are blowing it, IMO.
Fri Jan 30, 2015, 12:16 AM
Jan 2015

I think they could get Gitmo back, have the embargo lifted, and number of other things too once relations were restored as part of bilateral agreements, but by insisting on those things as preconditions, they aren't gonna get anything.

I think Obama would gladly negotiate Gitmo away. But not as a precondition. It won't happen, IMO.

We don't really need Cuba. If they don't wanna normalize, no skin off our nose.

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
11. I am not surprised really but imo until the time that the US changes its mind
Fri Jan 30, 2015, 01:25 AM
Jan 2015

Cuba should consider trying to get part of the area turned into a special economic zone instead.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
14. IMO
Fri Jan 30, 2015, 06:39 AM
Jan 2015

I don't know how we obtained it to begin with, but it should be given back so a real normalization can take place. Of course, the return could not take place until we clean it up and get all of our military junk out. How many years would that take? I say 10 years.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US says 'no' to handing G...