Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,556 posts)
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 01:17 AM Jan 2015

Incredible 50-foot 'dragon' dinosaur unearthed by Chinese farmers

Source: CNN

By Naomi Ng

Hong Kong (CNN)Paleontologists have discovered a 50-foot "dragon" dinosaur species in China that may have roamed the earth 160 million years ago during the Late Jurassic period.

The long skeleton was found in 2006 by farmers digging for a fish pond in Qijiang city in the southwestern Chongqing province.

Lida Xing, a member of the research team from the University of Alberta who made the discovery, told CNN it was named Qijianglong, the "dragon of Qijiang" because farmers thought the bones resembled the shape of Chinese mythical dragons.

"We found the dinosaur's huge vertebrae with the skull and the tail, but couldn't find any bones from the hands or the legs. So the locals began to say the long body looked just like a dragon from ancient Chinese stories," said Xing.

FULL story & video at link.



The reconstructed skeleton of Qijianglong in Qijiang Museum in China


Read more: http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/30/asia/china-dragon-dinosaur/

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Incredible 50-foot 'dragon' dinosaur unearthed by Chinese farmers (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jan 2015 OP
Did it breathe fire? shenmue Jan 2015 #1
Pity they didn't find it in 2012 forest444 Jan 2015 #3
Chinese dragons don't breathe fire. nt List left Jan 2015 #5
Especially if they've been dead for millions of years. :) Cal33 Jan 2015 #9
"Fear dragon" William Seger Jan 2015 #13
Lying ass Commies..... Cryptoad Jan 2015 #2
Praise the Lord! forest444 Jan 2015 #4
Careful nxylas Jan 2015 #6
If Mitch McConnell isn't a dinosaur, then I don't know what is Kennah Jan 2015 #7
"If Mitch McConnell isn't a dinosaur..." greiner3 Jan 2015 #11
Why do they have such long necks? nt bemildred Jan 2015 #8
Probably for the same reason giraffes do BumRushDaShow Jan 2015 #10
I suppose. bemildred Jan 2015 #12
It also doesn't look like a dragon with that long a neck. randome Jan 2015 #14
The European concept/imagery of a dragon was different from the Chinese BumRushDaShow Jan 2015 #19
I stand corrected. randome Jan 2015 #20
I expect the carnivores were not grazing in the same territory BumRushDaShow Jan 2015 #18
Thanks, that's interesting. bemildred Jan 2015 #21
They were Vegetarians eating only the very Tree-Top branches of Trees as their main FOOD source. Johnny Rash Jan 2015 #15
Yeah, I guess that's what I'm saying, it looks like a dead-end strategy. bemildred Jan 2015 #16
Hmm, that's for sure! Johnny Rash Jan 2015 #17
Orgies Kennah Jan 2015 #22

forest444

(5,902 posts)
3. Pity they didn't find it in 2012
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 01:42 AM
Jan 2015

The Year of the Dragon.

Mark your calendars for February 19, and make your (Chinese) New Year's resolution to put a little more aside if you can. Tradition has it that Wooden Goat years tend to be lean.

William Seger

(10,778 posts)
13. "Fear dragon"
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 11:06 AM
Jan 2015

I had heard somewhere that the Chinese word for dinosaur is the same as the word for dragon. According to Google translation, that isn't quite true. Simplified Chinese for "dragon" is 龙 while "dinosaur" is 恐龙 which is a combination of the characters for "fear" and "dragon."

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
6. Careful
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 03:43 AM
Jan 2015

The use of the word "dragon" in the headline already gives ammunition to the young earth creationists. They maintain that the existence of dragons in mythology and folklore prove that humans and dinosaurs lived at the same time.

BumRushDaShow

(128,699 posts)
10. Probably for the same reason giraffes do
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 09:20 AM
Jan 2015

and why elephants have long trunks. The food source for these herbivores is the foliage of very tall trees.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
12. I suppose.
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 11:03 AM
Jan 2015

It just seems like it would be easy for something to bite it off too, and awkward to maneuver. That skeleton looks worse than any giraffe.

I've seen various other theories too, but yours is the best, the high food idea, but that is one heck of a long neck there.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
14. It also doesn't look like a dragon with that long a neck.
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 11:56 AM
Jan 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

BumRushDaShow

(128,699 posts)
19. The European concept/imagery of a dragon was different from the Chinese
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 05:07 PM
Jan 2015

European (tended to have wings) -





Chinese -



 

randome

(34,845 posts)
20. I stand corrected.
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 06:43 PM
Jan 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

BumRushDaShow

(128,699 posts)
18. I expect the carnivores were not grazing in the same territory
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 04:52 PM
Jan 2015

as the herbivores so you wouldn't have that type of competition for food.

There was a little article on a potential theory about the characteristics of the long neck...

http://www.livescience.com/38895-sauropods-had-stiff-necks.html

 

Johnny Rash

(227 posts)
15. They were Vegetarians eating only the very Tree-Top branches of Trees as their main FOOD source.
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 02:06 PM
Jan 2015
Most Trees in those days were very enormous and tall, because it was the best DEFENSE mechanism TREES could have in order to escape all those seriously heavy Vegetarians.

Still, I wonder if this IDEA could be used as basic for the Explanation on "why" Evolution choose Carnivores (such as T-Rex) over Vegetarians Dinosaurs?

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
16. Yeah, I guess that's what I'm saying, it looks like a dead-end strategy.
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 03:04 PM
Jan 2015

Something you'd find on an island or with some sort of arms race. Yet they were around for a long time, I suppose things were different back then.

 

Johnny Rash

(227 posts)
17. Hmm, that's for sure!
Sat Jan 31, 2015, 03:41 PM
Jan 2015
Maybe the availability produced by a LARGE Land Mass Size could explain the fact they were around for a long time?
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Incredible 50-foot 'drago...