Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Tue Feb 10, 2015, 11:58 PM Feb 2015

Obama Welcomes Supreme Court Move To End 'Patchwork' Marriage Laws

Source: BuzzFeed

President Obama Tuesday welcomed the Supreme Court’s signals that marriage equality is on the verge of becoming the law of the land, adding that he expected local Alabama officials resisting the shift to be swept aside by federal courts.

... “My sense is that the Supreme Court is about to make a shift, one that I welcome, which is to recognize that — having hit a critical mass of states that have recognized same-sex marriage — it doesn’t make sense for us to now have this patchwork system,” Obama said in an interview with BuzzFeed News. “It’s time to recognize that under the equal protection clause of the United States (Constitution), same-sex couples should have the same rights as anybody else.”

... In the interview, Obama said comparisons to Alabama’s civil rights past — Gov. George Wallace infamously blocked the door of Foster Auditorium at the University of Alabama on June 11, 1963 — aren’t exact, but that the same legal principle is involved.

... Obama also dismissed Moore’s attempts to foil the various federal courts’ moves, invoking Moore’s last high-profile clash with federal law over his efforts to bring a religious monument into the state supreme court building. That dispute ended with his removal from the bench.

Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/obama-welcomes-supreme-court-move-to-end-patchwork-marriage

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama Welcomes Supreme Court Move To End 'Patchwork' Marriage Laws (Original Post) Newsjock Feb 2015 OP
The problem - then as now - is the Seditious South (and a lot of other states besides). forest444 Feb 2015 #1
Isn't it terrific that Judge Moore has offered to go to jail! TexasTowelie Feb 2015 #2
What if SCOTUS decides only that it's a state issue? Are we then back to those few states that 24601 Feb 2015 #3
Then we have a real mess. Ms. Toad Feb 2015 #4
Thank you PBO Ruby the Liberal Feb 2015 #5
-$ DeSwiss Feb 2015 #6
And then the 'brilliant' LittleGirl Feb 2015 #7

forest444

(5,902 posts)
1. The problem - then as now - is the Seditious South (and a lot of other states besides).
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 12:18 AM
Feb 2015

And today's teanecks are a lot more brazen than even Orval Faubus, George Wallace, or Ross Barnett were in their day.

Back then, when Kennedy or Johnson gave ultimatums, these demagogues thought twice. Now, their attitude is a lot like those gun nut bumper stickers one sees so much of these days:

"Come and Take It."

TexasTowelie

(112,387 posts)
2. Isn't it terrific that Judge Moore has offered to go to jail!
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 12:46 AM
Feb 2015
And while Moore doubled down Tuesday, telling Bloomberg Politics he would go to jail over the issue, Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley distanced himself from Moore, telling the Associated Press that he is “trying to move this state forward” and “do{esn’t} want Alabama to be seen as it was 50 years ago when a federal law was defied.”


Who could resist such an offer? We shouldn't disappoint him.

24601

(3,962 posts)
3. What if SCOTUS decides only that it's a state issue? Are we then back to those few states that
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 12:49 AM
Feb 2015

chose same sex marriage by legislative or referendum action as opposed to the vast majority where it was decided by a federal judge?

Then what?

Ms. Toad

(34,086 posts)
4. Then we have a real mess.
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 01:18 AM
Feb 2015

They will have to decide how to handle all of the marriages that have taken place in states where the state discrimination statute/amendment was declared unconstitutional.

That involves taking rights away (legally a much harder thing to do than to refuse to grant them in the first place)

or

Defending the unequal status between same gender couples married within the window and same gender couples who missed the window. They can make a rational basis argument for not granting marriage at all - but it is far harder to make a rational basis argument that the state should grant rights to couples married in the window - but not to couples who missed the window.

Neither is a legally attractive option.

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
6. -$
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 01:57 AM
Feb 2015
- Neil says the answer is obvious:

[center]

''Too much BigPharma campain munies would be lost. It's science!''[/center]

LittleGirl

(8,291 posts)
7. And then the 'brilliant'
Wed Feb 11, 2015, 02:08 AM
Feb 2015

folks of Alabama re-elected him last term. sigh.

My cousin, who is gay, lives in AL and he had a link up on his facebook yesterday to get Moore removed from the bench AGAIN.

edit typo

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama Welcomes Supreme Co...