Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,639 posts)
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 09:03 AM Feb 2015

Baby Griffin is measles-free, mom confirms after an agonizing week of isolation

Source: The Star

Jennifer White, who wrote a much-shared Facebook post blasting anti-vaxxers, is glad to see the end of a 21-day period after his possible exposure to measles.

By: Katrina Clarke

It’s a happy ending for Jennifer White and her healthy, smiling baby boy.

Baby Griffin was just 15 days old when a measles-infected person shared the same Markham doctor’s waiting room with him in late January, in turn possibly exposing him to measles.

White put herself and her unvaccinated son in self-imposed isolation for a week — waiting anxiously for the 21-day measles incubation period to pass.

At 2 p.m. Tuesday, that point came.

FULL story at link.



Griffin White was just 15 days old when he was potentially exposed to measles at a Markham doctor's office in late January. After a week-plus of self-imposed isolation by mom Jennifer, Griffin is now confirmed to be measles-free.

Read more: http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/02/17/baby-griffin-is-measles-free-mom-confirms-after-an-agonizing-week-of-quarantine.html



See this earlier LBN story: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141016075
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Baby Griffin is measles-free, mom confirms after an agonizing week of isolation (Original Post) Omaha Steve Feb 2015 OP
Much drama about next to nothing. Chemisse Feb 2015 #1
Hopefully she got the attention of ant-vaxxers and made them think csziggy Feb 2015 #4
+1000 DeSwiss Feb 2015 #5
Probably baby was still immune; but you can't fully rely on it LeftishBrit Feb 2015 #16
Your concern for the health of the baby in duly noted NickB79 Feb 2015 #22
Lol! I would've been concerned had there been a significant danger that he would actually get sick. Chemisse Feb 2015 #23
one infected person with measles on average infects 12 others CreekDog Feb 2015 #25
Babies are born with temporary immunity to this disease, Chemisse Feb 2015 #27
Whoosh! NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #26
Thank goodness shenmue Feb 2015 #2
Not the baby griffin I was expecting geomon666 Feb 2015 #3
Same here. I was thinking "Wait? Griffins are reals?" -nt Liberal Veteran Feb 2015 #10
Nor I..... MADem Feb 2015 #17
Glad to hear it. jwirr Feb 2015 #6
She screaming at the anti-vacs people yet her son hasn't been vaccinated diabeticman Feb 2015 #7
"R" is for rubella YarnAddict Feb 2015 #8
Thanks for the info. Maybe my shot rec was a mis-print I have been trying to load her original diabeticman Feb 2015 #11
If you were not born after 1971, you didn't get an MMR. MADem Feb 2015 #18
You are correct. MMR is a 2 stage vaccination, the 1st at 12-15 months and FSogol Feb 2015 #13
Just so no one freaks out over what I know was a typo... 3catwoman3 Feb 2015 #20
Forgoting the dash certainly changed that. Thanks for the correction. n/t FSogol Feb 2015 #21
Rubella is German measles, the "R". uppityperson Feb 2015 #12
how can anyone think that a 15 day old baby is old enough to be vaccinated for MMR? CreekDog Feb 2015 #14
I'm surprised that you got it at 3 days; because the general consensus is that it doesn't work LeftishBrit Feb 2015 #15
In 1963 took newborn home to older kids with measles dem in texas Feb 2015 #9
How lucky. Now they can get back to getting to know each other. midnight Feb 2015 #19
Were they separated during their quarantine? JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2015 #24
As a parent, anytime an illness pops up- life takes a different tone. midnight Feb 2015 #28
I believe they were quarantined together. Ilsa Feb 2015 #29

Chemisse

(30,813 posts)
1. Much drama about next to nothing.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 09:15 AM
Feb 2015

Since this baby almost certainly had immunity from his mother, and will for some months to come.

But mother sure got a lot of attention over it.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
4. Hopefully she got the attention of ant-vaxxers and made them think
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 10:56 AM
Feb 2015

About possible consequences of their selfish decisions.

Immunity conferred from the mother is not guaranteed so exposure to a very contagious disease like measles is still extremely worrying especially to a mother who had lost one child.

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
16. Probably baby was still immune; but you can't fully rely on it
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 02:22 PM
Feb 2015

If a young baby does get measles, it can have serious consequences, and probably doesn't even immunize them for the future (see my other post).

Mum did get some attention; but fortunately so did the problem of unvaccinated kids.

Chemisse

(30,813 posts)
23. Lol! I would've been concerned had there been a significant danger that he would actually get sick.
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 05:04 PM
Feb 2015

But it was exceedingly unlikely, which made this whole episode rather unseemly.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
25. one infected person with measles on average infects 12 others
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 06:53 PM
Feb 2015

and this baby was exposed.

are you substituting "oh, everything will be fine" for science?

you shouldn't.

Chemisse

(30,813 posts)
27. Babies are born with temporary immunity to this disease,
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 07:57 PM
Feb 2015

Provided the mother has either been infected with it or been inoculated for it.

The immunity lasts about 12 months in the children of those who have had the disease. Studies indicate it may not be as long in those babies whose mother only had a vaccine for it.

Either way, this infant was almost certainly NOT going to contract it.

I thought the mother's blog unnecessarily hyperbolic, but who's to say what is a normal response for a woman who has lost a child.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
26. Whoosh!
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 07:27 PM
Feb 2015

Right over their head.

Everyone's a doctor when it comes to certain topics. I love the OMG WTF kinds of conversations that go on among laypeople who feel obliged to add their two cents.

Subtlety and humility are characteristics that seem to have all but vanished among our modern race of humans.

At least in this country!

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
7. She screaming at the anti-vacs people yet her son hasn't been vaccinated
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 12:15 PM
Feb 2015

White put herself and her un vaccinated son in self-imposed isolation for a week — waiting anxiously for the 21-day measles incubation period to pass.


Granted I don't have kids but when I was born according to my shot record I got the MMR 3 days after I was born. the shot for Measles and mumps (I don't know what the R stands for)

 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
8. "R" is for rubella
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 12:20 PM
Feb 2015

I don't think they give the MMR that early. In fact, I believe it isn't given til a child is over a year old.

If you read the mom's original Facebook post you will understand the situation better, and will know that particular mother will do everything she can to protect her children from illnesses.

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
11. Thanks for the info. Maybe my shot rec was a mis-print I have been trying to load her original
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 12:39 PM
Feb 2015

post it won't come through.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
18. If you were not born after 1971, you didn't get an MMR.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 03:43 PM
Feb 2015

It was introduced in USA that year, and in UK in 1988.

FSogol

(45,485 posts)
13. You are correct. MMR is a 2 stage vaccination, the 1st at 12-15 months and
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 02:09 PM
Feb 2015

Last edited Fri Feb 20, 2015, 08:24 AM - Edit history (1)

the 2nd part at age 4-6. Most schools require the 2nd before entering Kindergarten.

If you got the vaccination between 1963 and 1984, you probably need a booster.
If you got it before 1963 or after 1984 you are most likely safe.

Ask you doctor.

3catwoman3

(23,993 posts)
20. Just so no one freaks out over what I know was a typo...
Thu Feb 19, 2015, 10:51 PM
Feb 2015

...my nurse practitioner background is compelled to point out that the second MMR is given between 4-6 years.

I hope I caused no offense.

LeftishBrit

(41,205 posts)
15. I'm surprised that you got it at 3 days; because the general consensus is that it doesn't work
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 02:18 PM
Feb 2015

before about a year. So the baby could not have been successfully vaccinated at this stage. Fortunately, he was probably still relatively immune due to maternal antibodies; but you can't always rely on this.

Indeed, people who caught measles as babies in the pre-vaccination past sometimes got it again later, because the first time was too early to 'take'. My dad had it twice for that reason, once at 6 months and once at 5 years.

So I'd suggest checking your immunity and perhaps getting a booster, if you're sure you got the vaccination at 3 days.

dem in texas

(2,674 posts)
9. In 1963 took newborn home to older kids with measles
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 12:21 PM
Feb 2015

My 2 year old and 4 year old had red measles, but doctor said newborn baby Judy was immune and so I took her home, she did not get the measles. By the time she was 12 months old, the measles vaccine was available. Thank god for vaccines, I am old enough to remember all the damage childhood diseases did. The sickest I was ever in my life was when I was years old and got the red measles.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
24. Were they separated during their quarantine?
Fri Feb 20, 2015, 06:31 PM
Feb 2015

I thought the mother was with the kid during quarantine.

So I'm guessing no damage done to the kid. Mom's patience, on the other hand ...

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
29. I believe they were quarantined together.
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 07:44 AM
Feb 2015

An infant needs to be held, not just have his physical needs tended to.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Baby Griffin is measles-f...