CIA looks to expand its cyber espionage capabilities
Source: WaPo
CIA Director John O. Brennan is planning a major expansion of the agencys cyber espionage capabilities as part of a broad restructuring of an intelligence service long defined by its human spy work, current and former U.S. officials said. The proposed shift reflects a determination that the CIAs approach to conventional espionage is increasingly outmoded amid the exploding use of smartphones, social media and other technologies.
U.S. officials said Brennans plans call for increased use of cyber capabilities in almost every category of operations whether identifying foreign officials to recruit as CIA informants, confirming the identities of targets of drone strikes or penetrating Internet-savvy adversaries such as the Islamic State.
Several officials said that Brennans team has even considered creating a new cyber directorate a step that would put the agencys technology experts on equal footing with the operations and analysis branches that have been pillars of the CIAs organizational structure for decades.
U.S. officials emphasized that the plans would not involve new legal authorities, and that Brennan may stop short of creating a new directorate. But the suggestion underscores the scope of Brennans ambitions, as well as their potential to raise privacy concerns or lead to turf skirmishes with the National Security Agency the dominant player in electronic espionage.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/cia-looks-to-expand-its-cyber-espionage-capabilities/2015/02/23/a028e80c-b94d-11e4-9423-f3d0a1ec335c_story.html?postshare=7501424727445250
Ah, the news we miss while busy polishing Academy Awards....
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Obama should have canned his sorry lying ass a year ago.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Folks must still be hungover from the Oscar party
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)It's difficult to cross man with details on every secret drone strike you've authorizedespecially the legally dubious ones.
When
John Brennan assured the country that the CIA hadn't improperly monitored the Senate team that compiled a report on Bush-era torture, he fed us false information. That much is clear from Thursday's news that "the C.I.A. secretly monitored a congressional committee charged with supervising its activities." Either the CIA director was lying or he was unaware of grave missteps at the agency he leads. There are already calls for his resignation or firing from Senator Mark Udall, Trevor Timm, Dan Froomkin, and Andrew Sullivan, plus a New York Times editorial airing his ouster as a possibility.
President Obama could surprise the country by axing his former counterterrorism adviser, explaining that under Brennan's management, employees broke laws and undermined the separation of powers core to our democracy. Obama may well make a good-faith effort to act in the national interest. But it's impossible to believe that he won't be aware of the following: No U.S. official knows more than Brennan about Obama's many drone killings. Some of the killings were solidly grounded in international law. And others may have violated the Fifth Amendment, international law, or the laws of war.
In the past, Brennan has been willing to lie about those drone strikes to hide ugly realities. For example, he stated in the summer of 2011 that there had been zero collateral deaths from covert U.S. drone strikes in the previous year, an absurd claim that has been decisively debunked. What if he grew more forthright, either in public statements or by anonymously leaking information?
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/08/does-john-brennan-know-too-much-to-be-fired-by-barack-obama/375431/
In December 2005, he described President Bushs rendition program as an absolutely vital tool on PBS. And when the Associated Press revealed in 2011, in a Pulitzer Prizewinning series of articles, that the New York City Police Department had orchestrated an intensive spying campaign directed at Muslims, without any basis for suspicion of criminal, much less terrorist, activity, Brennan defended the NYPD for striking the right balance between civil liberties and national security.*
John Brennan Was Number Two at the Bush/Cheney CIA During Renditions, Enhanced Interrogations, and the Iraq War
John Brennan, was a Bush/Cheney man at the top level of the intelligence agency during the post 9/11 period. BuzzFlash at Truthout doesn't usually resort to quoting Wikipedia, but it has a good summary of his service for Bush/Cheney and the get-along-to-go-along George Tenet at the CIA:
In 1999 he was appointed chief of staff to George Tenet, then-Director of the CIA. Brennan became deputy executive director of the CIA in March 2001. He was director of the newly created Terrorist Threat Integration Center from 2003 to 2004, an office that sifted through and compiled information for President Bush's daily top secret intelligence briefings and employed the services of analysts from a dozen U.S. agencies and entities. One of the controversies in his career involves the distribution of intelligence to the Bush White House that helped lead to an "Orange Terror Alert", over Christmas 2003. The intelligence, which purported to list terror targets, was highly controversial within the CIA and was later discredited. An Obama administration official does not dispute that Brennan distributed the intelligence during the Bush era but said Brennan passed it along because that was his job. His last post within the Intelligence Community was as director of the National Counterterrorism Center in 2004 and 2005, which incorporated information on terrorist activities across U.S. agencies.
Remember, this was at a time that Cheney, as vice president, was taking unprecedented trips to CIA headquarters in Virginia to muscle the intelligence officers there to create facts to fit the propaganda justification for invading Iraq. There is no indication that Brennan objected or tried to keep the agency independent of the coercion.
More than that, Brennan was a cheerleader for torture and rendition, as Glenn Greenwald noted back in 2008, when he expressed concern about Brennan's role as a national security advisor in the Obama White House:
It simply is noteworthy of comment and cause for concern though far from conclusive about what Obama will do that Obamas transition chief for intelligence policy, John Brennan, was an ardent supporter of torture and one of the most emphatic advocates of FISA expansions and telecom immunity.
http://truth-out.org/buzzflash/commentary/john-brennan-was-number-two-at-the-bush-cheney-cia-during-renditions-enhanced-interrogations-and-the-iraq-war/17820-john-brennan-was-number-two-at-the-bush-cheney-cia-during-renditions-enhanced-interrogations-and-the-iraq-war
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Isn't it time we got some answers about the Republicans and Bush supporters/appointees in the cabinet of a Democratic President?
Not just Brennen, Clapper, another one who lied to Congress and still has his job.
Makes you wonder, is the CIA running things due to the information they have on everyone?
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)Secrecy around police surveillance equipment proves a cases undoing
..
But before trial, his defense team detected investigators use of a secret surveillance tool, one that raises significant privacy concerns. In an unprecedented move, a state judge ordered the police to show the device a cell-tower simulator sometimes called a StingRay to the attorneys.
Rather than show the equipment, the state offered McKenzie a plea bargain.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/secrecy-around-police-surveillance-equipment-proves-a-cases-undoing/2015/02/22/ce72308a-b7ac-11e4-aa05-1ce812b3fdd2_story.html
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)
especially for the recent Academy Award win for the documentary on Edward Snowden (shown on HBO for the first time last night
"Citizen Four"
This should be viewed by everyone.
I was going to OP this, if you hadn't. My
What big biceps the CIA tries to flex in the face of it plans to elevate espionage efforts?
Somebody please get a sledge hammer to smash the CIA into a thousand pieces. We need to take back everything they've stolen from us, one packet at a time.
JEB
(4,748 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)It certainly raises privacy concerns. And questions about effectiveness of these operations.