Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,278 posts)
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:00 PM Apr 2015

Jeb Bush Backs Hike in Social Security Retirement Age

Source: National Journal

MANCHESTER, NH—Jeb Bush grabbed one of the third rails of American politics on Friday, declaring that the retirement age for Social Security should be raised and "in relatively short order."

"I think we need to raise the retirement age, not for people that are already nearing, receiving Social Security, or already on it, but raise it gradually, over a long period of time for people that are just entering the system," Bush said. "And I think we need to do that in relatively short order."

Bush made the comments at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College in Manchester—the same venue that potential presidential rival, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, outlined an entitlement-reform package of his own earlier this week that also included raising the Social Security retirement age.

Christie called for eventually bringing the retirement age to 69. Bush offered no such specifics during his appearance at the institute. Asked by National Journal afterward if he had a specific age in mind, Bush said, "No—not yet."


Read more: http://www.nationaljournal.com/2016-elections/2016-jeb-bush-social-security-retirement-age-20150417



Jeb, here's a hint. If you're going to say something stupid and pandering, it helps to say it first...
54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeb Bush Backs Hike in Social Security Retirement Age (Original Post) brooklynite Apr 2015 OP
Reced for exposire. n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2015 #1
Of course. Need money to fund tax cuts for the rich. Helen Borg Apr 2015 #2
and their wars SummerSnow Apr 2015 #26
Yes the Greedy 1% warrant46 Apr 2015 #42
Certainly. He won't need it, so why should he care about any one else? hamsterjill Apr 2015 #3
Newsflash jackass. The average Fox News viewer is around that age. onehandle Apr 2015 #4
fake news viewers are beyond logic Iliyah Apr 2015 #13
They won't touch anyone born before 1960 yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #21
and they will back him up 100%... SummerSnow Apr 2015 #27
Jeb Bush turbinetree Apr 2015 #5
Alternate Headline, "Prez Candidate Looking to Lose Home State" n/t itsrobert Apr 2015 #6
"No - Not Yet" Is The Answer Someone Not Ready For Prime Time Would Give DallasNE Apr 2015 #7
And we were told that Jeb is the smart one groundloop Apr 2015 #8
He clearly is the smarter Bush brother. Frank Cannon Apr 2015 #35
JEB... ELIMINATE THE FUCKING CAP AND SOCIAL SECURITY WILL BE FINE groundloop Apr 2015 #9
Marie Antoinette: "Let them eat cake." tabasco Apr 2015 #10
Well Put !! warrant46 Apr 2015 #43
A reality he does not get is this: dixiegrrrrl Apr 2015 #11
I Have a Friend RobinA Apr 2015 #49
When she reaches 65, she will be automatically switched over to reg. SS. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2015 #53
IIRC, Clinton's also on record to raise the age and/or cut benefits MannyGoldstein Apr 2015 #12
Which Clinton? I hadn't heard that one before. (wouldn't be surprised though) nm progree Apr 2015 #15
Both. Bill actually made a deal with Newt to starve grannies, MannyGoldstein Apr 2015 #20
I don't give a FF what Bill did. He's not running AFAIK. As for Hillary, you should back up what progree Apr 2015 #25
I found this article... christx30 Apr 2015 #37
There is already a sliding scale in place, adding time to when you can retire, with full benefits. SoapBox Apr 2015 #14
Yes. I think the so-called full retirement age maxes out at 67 for people born in 1960 and later progree Apr 2015 #16
I wish someone could conduct a study Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2015 #48
And experts are determining that since people Iliyah Apr 2015 #17
25 is for college people. If you are not in that group, you probably started working at 16 LiberalArkie Apr 2015 #18
Only the affluent are living longer. The trend among lower income people is negative. LongTomH Apr 2015 #34
I can't retire until I'm 67 now....my mom died at 68. ileus Apr 2015 #19
+1 area51 Apr 2015 #47
Seriously? chapdrum Apr 2015 #22
Ask yourself, "To what electorate is this statement intended to appeal?" lostnfound Apr 2015 #23
So his plan is to slash SS for young people, to divide & conquer. Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #24
How about raising the cap instead of trying to deny Social Security benefits to folks, hoping they still_one Apr 2015 #28
If they raised it to age 90, they could really save some money! Larry Engels Apr 2015 #29
Beware of Republicans saving something Tommy2Tone Apr 2015 #30
And of course no one that wants to "fix" Social Security, mentions anything about our Defense Budget -none Apr 2015 #52
$118,000 FICA tax for millionaires and billionaires + corporations that don't pay any taxes. YOHABLO Apr 2015 #31
Who the hell wants to work till they are 69? Klong Apr 2015 #32
Who the hell can work until they are 69? DallasNE Apr 2015 #38
"...the physical pounding is more than people past 62 can take." KansDem Apr 2015 #51
Just make it kacekwl Apr 2015 #33
That Will Really Go Over Well With Floridian's Corey_Baker08 Apr 2015 #36
The ones who already 'have it' often don't care... JCMach1 Apr 2015 #50
Old folks in walkers, delivering newspapers and waiting on tables daleo Apr 2015 #39
Here's another idea, Jeb-boy: have your fam pay back to the Treasury all your crony $/benefits....nt JudyM Apr 2015 #40
Buck Fush. N/t roamer65 Apr 2015 #41
People forget, but... davekriss Apr 2015 #44
GOP plan is raise the age until most are dead... freshwest Apr 2015 #45
I would back exile to a remote Pacific island for the entire bush* clan nolabels Apr 2015 #46
The less money Social Security pays out... bikebloke Apr 2015 #54

hamsterjill

(15,220 posts)
3. Certainly. He won't need it, so why should he care about any one else?
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:12 PM
Apr 2015

He's a Bush. Nuff said.

More years for people to die before they can collect and more money for the rich that way.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
4. Newsflash jackass. The average Fox News viewer is around that age.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:14 PM
Apr 2015

So you want to go after your own people?

Please proceed...

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
13. fake news viewers are beyond logic
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:59 PM
Apr 2015

and with so much vile hatred they are easily convinced that everybody and everything that does not following their suit is the DEVIL.

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
5. Jeb Bush
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:14 PM
Apr 2015

Jeb Bush: Net worth of $10 million how much of this did he pay into Social Security.
Well boys and girls since you might ask---after $118, 000.01 cents (2015 funding requirement) he doesn't pay one single solitary dime---not one.
At this and only $118,000.00 he pays only $7,316.00 dollars---that's it nothing more--zilch---nadda.
So if this logic is correct he pays a whopping $7,316.00 @ 6.2%,for $10 million in worth (nice game huh-----just like any other republican--saying the system is broken--and they want there wall street hedge fund cronies to get there mitts on this---its not going to happen---there buck and buckettes)
Then if you subtract that from his $10 million that leaves him with $9.992,648.00 dollars and some change to just to go around and say:
Let me get my hands on this program so please let me screw some people while the slobs pay for my and my corrupt friends social security---what a deal, just like a typical republican car salesman with his billionaire and millionaire backers and the republican slobs (suckers) that one day they will be like bushy

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
7. "No - Not Yet" Is The Answer Someone Not Ready For Prime Time Would Give
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:28 PM
Apr 2015

Bush looks weak and vacillating here. He has been out of office for around 10 years so he has had plenty of time to formulate a position on this issue. And with his blood lines everybody knows he was only waiting for the right time to run. And, no, I don't think you can attribute mistakes like this to rust from the long layoff. He is showing that he has his brother's brainpower - which is to say is underwhelming.

Frank Cannon

(7,570 posts)
35. He clearly is the smarter Bush brother.
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 11:25 AM
Apr 2015

In the same way that Moe was clearly the most competent of the Three Stooges.

groundloop

(11,510 posts)
9. JEB... ELIMINATE THE FUCKING CAP AND SOCIAL SECURITY WILL BE FINE
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:38 PM
Apr 2015

DON'T RAISE THE RETIREMENT AGE. Most of us will NEVER be able to retire if those repub assholes have their way.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
11. A reality he does not get is this:
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:52 PM
Apr 2015

Loads of people went on Soc. Sec. disability, during these past 10 years of lousy economy, cause they were not old enough for retirement Soc. Sec.
( I am NOT talking about the state's SSI disability program).

So they got the disability, plus at least Medicare A.
When they turned 65, they were automatically switched over to reg. Soc. Sec. and could get Medicare B also.

Thus the Soc. Sec. system overall was paying out a lot of money.

Now, what happens when people have to wait till 69 for Soc. Sec.?
They will go on Disability if they can qualify, for longer, until they reach the 69 birthday mark.

What Jeb and his cohorts are not saying:
Since so very many Americans have been forced into minimal wage jobs, any Soc. Sec. due them is going to be much lower, cause it is based on amount earned.
But there is no plan for Washington to stop spending Soc. Sec. taxes as fast as they come in, leaving the program high and dry.
Washington takes the money and sticks an IOU in the ledger, payable in future Treasury bonds.
Lot of countries that used to buy these debo bonds are now selling them off.
Gonna be an interesting future.


RobinA

(9,884 posts)
49. I Have a Friend
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 08:50 AM
Apr 2015

in just this position. A good worker, smart, laid off at age 60 in yet another round of cost saving cutbacks. Had some disabilities that developed over the 20 + years she worked for them, but was able to work the job well having developed some work arounds that cost the company 0$.

Now its time to look for a new job. At age 60, needing health insurance, with understanding of the need for doctor's appointments. Needless to say, that didn't work real well. Hired a lawyer and got SSD without much problem. Now the government pays this person starting at age 60 instead of normal retirement age. A company saves some money and a person who would prefer to work doesn't. I think we see who the winner is here.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
53. When she reaches 65, she will be automatically switched over to reg. SS.
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 10:54 AM
Apr 2015

If she is getting full disability now, there will be change in her income.


But..the Repugs are seriously looking at the disability part of SS for cuts. Now.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
12. IIRC, Clinton's also on record to raise the age and/or cut benefits
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 03:53 PM
Apr 2015

to address the fully-fake crisis! crisis! in Social Security.

Republican/Third-Way Granny Starving brigade.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
20. Both. Bill actually made a deal with Newt to starve grannies,
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:12 PM
Apr 2015

but Congress stopped it. In 2008, Hillary was prattling on about the need to "reform" Social Security or some such crap, without raising taxes.

progree

(10,884 posts)
25. I don't give a FF what Bill did. He's not running AFAIK. As for Hillary, you should back up what
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:42 PM
Apr 2015

you say if you wish to have any credibility, and not just being another worthless polemicist.

And by the way, I probably don't like Hillary any more than you do ( http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6520767 ). But around here "IIRC" blah blah doesn't convince anyone of anything.

12. IIRC, Clinton's also on record to raise the age and/or cut benefits to address the fully-fake crisis! crisis! in Social Security.


20. In 2008, Hillary was prattling on about the need to "reform" Social Security or some such crap, without raising taxes.


Oh, so you did some research after the "IIRC" in response #12 -- at least you got it down to a specific year. Maybe you can share the link. Though in #12 you were pretty specific in what you IIRC'd [font color = blue]"raise the age and/or cut benefits"[/font], while in #20, though you've got a specific year, suddenly the prescription is a bit more vague [font color = blue]"the need to 'reform' Social Security or some such crap, without raising taxes"[/font].

And whether it is a crisis or not, the projections are that Social Security will not be able to pay promised benefits after 2033 (18 years from now), and those projections have been trending to an earlier and earlier trust fund exhaustion date. Maybe you can tell us why that's not a problem.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
37. I found this article...
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 11:41 AM
Apr 2015
http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/11931/hillarys-social-security-plan-no-private-accounts-no-raised-retirement-age-no
It's from 2007, but it says she wouldn't raise the retirement age.

Hillary Clinton: “Raising the retirement age isn’t the answer” to preserving Social Security. “Let me start with calling for a renewed national commitment to Social Security, this is the most successful domestic program in the history of the United States. And you don’t have to worry, when I’m president, privatization is off the table, because it does not answer anything. From my perspective cutting benefits is not the answer, raising the retirement age isn’t the answer, we need to get back to the fiscal responsibilities that we had in the 1990s where we weren’t raiding the social security trust fund anymore. When my husband left office, we had a secure Social Security system until 2055, and now all of the sudden the Bush administration took us back into deficits we lost 14 years off the solvency of the Social Security trust fund in the last six and a half years.” [NBC News, 9/4/07]


And Salon think Hillary needs to do a u-turn on that. This was written 2 days ago:
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/16/heres_where_hillary_needs_to_flip_flop_the_tax_hike_she_must_reconsider_to_save_social_security/

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
14. There is already a sliding scale in place, adding time to when you can retire, with full benefits.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:14 PM
Apr 2015

But...no one ever talks about it and it surprises the hell out of people when they now find out.

I was born in 1955...my age for full benefits will need to be 66 plus 2 months.

progree

(10,884 posts)
16. Yes. I think the so-called full retirement age maxes out at 67 for people born in 1960 and later
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:23 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.aarp.org/work/social-security/info-02-2009/faq_social_security_earnings_limit.html


Full Retirement Age ((current law))

Born in or before 1937: 65
1938: 65 and 2 months
1939: 65 and 4 months
1940: 65 and 6 months
1941: 65 and 8 months
1942: 65 and 10 months
1943-54: 66
1955: 66 and 2 months
1956: 66 and 4 months
1957: 66 and 6 months
1958: 66 and 8 months
1959: 66 and 10 months
1960 and later: 67

And what Jeb wants to do is raise that 67 to something higher (but won't say how much higher). And Chris Christie wants to raise that 67 to 69, though I don't know what his timetable is except it will also be a gradual increase for those born later and later...

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
48. I wish someone could conduct a study
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 08:33 AM
Apr 2015

If we eliminate the SS cap, how much could we lower the percentage EVERYONE pays and still make SS solvent for future generations. Maybe even lower the retirement age back to 65. Anyone willing to try?

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
17. And experts are determining that since people
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 04:27 PM
Apr 2015

like here in the USA are living longer why not extend the retirement age (which personally I am against). Hell you start working around the age of 25 to 65, shite that 40 effing years. Not all businesses through employee's payroll put into SSI and those people are not entitled to it. But the ones who do like me do not want to work past 65. 65 is old enough, leave it alone, damn.

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
34. Only the affluent are living longer. The trend among lower income people is negative.
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 12:28 AM
Apr 2015

Especially lower-income women.

That's due to a number of factors: Lower-income workers actually encounter more stress; there is a lack of access to healthy foods, and a lack of access to preventive medical care. ACA might help with the latter; although recent studies show that people who were previously uninsured avoid going to the doctor for routine checkups.

 

chapdrum

(930 posts)
22. Seriously?
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:47 PM
Apr 2015

I like to think am in right mind...so, I don't take seriously, for an instant, ANYTHING that emanates from the fetid mind of ANY member of this traitorous family. Naturally, the MSM is delighted to prolong the deeply exhausted fantasy that said family is concerned about the American people, at all.

lostnfound

(16,159 posts)
23. Ask yourself, "To what electorate is this statement intended to appeal?"
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 05:56 PM
Apr 2015

I think the answer is that it ISN'T being said to win over any group of VOTERS. It's intended to please, and/or win approval from, some select tiny group of funders.

still_one

(92,055 posts)
28. How about raising the cap instead of trying to deny Social Security benefits to folks, hoping they
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 06:47 PM
Apr 2015

Would die before they have a chance to collect

And that goes for any Democrat also who thinks raising the age for SS is a good idea, they can all go to hell

Hopefully, the Democrats that will be running or in Congress won't do something so stupid and cruel

Tommy2Tone

(1,307 posts)
30. Beware of Republicans saving something
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:08 PM
Apr 2015

Bush favors raising the retirement age.

Christie opened with a platform of taking on Social Security and Medicare.

Paul: "If you are not going to look at entitlements then you are not a serious candidate."

Cruz: “However, given the gravity of the debt facing our children and grandchildren, I believe that Americans expect us to do more. We need meaningful entitlement reforms"

Rubio: "The drivers of our long-term debt are Medicare and Medicaid programs and, to some extent, Social Security."




-none

(1,884 posts)
52. And of course no one that wants to "fix" Social Security, mentions anything about our Defense Budget
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 10:15 AM
Apr 2015

When Social Security is mentioned, the Defense Budget is nowhere to be found. That needs to change.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
31. $118,000 FICA tax for millionaires and billionaires + corporations that don't pay any taxes.
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 07:24 PM
Apr 2015

Jeb, let's see how far you can go with this .. just try.

DallasNE

(7,402 posts)
38. Who the hell can work until they are 69?
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 12:06 PM
Apr 2015

When a company has a round of layoffs their senior workforce is hardest hit meaning people get pushed out the door early. Jeb talks as though this is a choice. Far from it. This is actually nothing more than a back door way to cut benefits. People over 55 are in constant fear of the pink slip because it is next to impossible for them to find new employment.

There are also jobs where the physical pounding is more than people past 62 can take. That is why provisions were put in the law to allow for early retirement.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
51. "...the physical pounding is more than people past 62 can take."
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 09:04 AM
Apr 2015

You're more apt to see a 69-year-old lawyer than a 69-year-old miner, but Jeb wouldn't know this.

kacekwl

(7,009 posts)
33. Just make it
Fri Apr 17, 2015, 09:30 PM
Apr 2015

100 years old. Why the fuck not ? Lets see , can't have a pension , can't get SS until 60 fucking nine. Work till you drop is the new deal I guess.

JCMach1

(27,553 posts)
50. The ones who already 'have it' often don't care...
Mon Apr 20, 2015, 08:51 AM
Apr 2015

The Medicare paid-for hoverround crowd just don't get the cognitive dissonance of their anti-government stance.

JudyM

(29,176 posts)
40. Here's another idea, Jeb-boy: have your fam pay back to the Treasury all your crony $/benefits....nt
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 03:38 PM
Apr 2015

davekriss

(4,615 posts)
44. People forget, but...
Sat Apr 18, 2015, 09:09 PM
Apr 2015

...George Walker Bush's two tax cuts reduced more revenue in 10 years than the predicted 75 year shortfall for social security.

Boy have we been robbed!!

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
45. GOP plan is raise the age until most are dead...
Sun Apr 19, 2015, 12:09 AM
Apr 2015

Jeb never did an honest day's work. All he did in office was rob the public for his family and cronies.

Born to be fed with a silver spoon in his mouth, he's always been retired, never need to work.

He'd never need a pension, it's just a GOP fat cat and mouse game.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeb Bush Backs Hike in So...