Putin Aims to Destabilize Ukraine, Former US Envoy Says
Source: Voice of America
A former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine says recent military moves by Russia show that President Vladimir Putin's "minimal goal is to destabilize the current government" in Ukraine.
John Herbst, who now directs the Eurasia Center at the Atlantic Council, a Washington think tank, said from Kyiv that Putin is seeking to ratchet up the pressure on Ukraine, "and in order to do that, he cant simply sit behind the cease-fire line. He needs to move forward to cause additional instability in the country.
Moscow has long denied charges by Kyiv and many Western governments that it has supported rebels in eastern Ukraine with military personnel and weapons.
But NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said Thursday that the Russians had moved a significant amount of military equipment along the Ukrainian border as well as inside eastern Ukraine. "They have provided the separatists with well above a thousand pieces of heavy equipment, advanced weapon systems, advanced air defenses, tanks, artillery, he said.
Read more: http://www.voanews.com/content/putin-aims-destabilize-ukraine-former-envoy-says/2734007.html
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)Cha
(297,034 posts)Joe Chi Minh
(15,229 posts)FairWinds
(1,717 posts)Well of course the USG destabilized a Ukranian government too.
Actually, I find RT less blatently propagandistic than VOA.
And VOA, by the way, uses our own tax dollars to propagandize us.
Little Tich
(6,171 posts)but in reality its just a Russian propaganda site. You wont find anything negative about Russia there.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)usbek
(6 posts)I think, this call everybody already knows in their mind. Do you?
There was BIG scandal in EU, I'm not sure anybody in US even knows what I'm talking about.
Ok, you can listen it here
About Putin destabilizing Ukraine, are you sure it is Putin? Read some other point of view
https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4790336352848302540#editor/target=post;postID=7929482876318472511;onPublishedMenu=posts;onClosedMenu=posts;postNum=8;src=postname
deurbano
(2,894 posts)Little Tich
(6,171 posts)And where did the terrorists get their long range SAM battery from, you know, the one which they used to shoot down the MH17?
Don't try to blame Ukraine for being invaded. It's like blaming Poland for being invaded by the Soviet Union.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)We have no business deciding who the next president should be. We need to stay out of this.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Countries discuss who they want to see in power in a particular country. Big deal.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)that's Putin's men My bad, Nuland is a diplomat who was overheard saying F$%k the EU. You know on the phone call that Russia tapped.
Putin needs to be careful. If Obama does decide to unleash our military on him he won't win. Putin doesn't have the equipment/technology/forces we do. Luckily for him starting a ground war in Asia is generally viewed as a really bad idea.
swilton
(5,069 posts)Unlike the other countries that NATO & the US invaded which by the way was a violation of the UN Charter, Russia has nukes. Ukraine is in Russia's vital interests-and Russia will not back off. Unlike the US which has to transport their heavy arms across the Atlantic, Russia is on Ukraine's back door. Furthermore, NATO is hardly unified about having a confrontation on it's back porch. It's okay to bomb and invade other countries when their in the Middle East and miles away - Ukraine is an entirely different matter. They've been there and done that as far as having wars in Europe - even if it is the eastern part.
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)even my pro-American stance, just cold hard analysis of equipment. If Putin continues to upgrade and expand his military he will one day have a similar amount of equipment and troops, maybe even surpass us, but that day hasn't come yet.
I've also read that Putin has a shortage of able bodied young men if there were a protracted war.
I don't think Putin would ever use nukes, he's not stupid. He doesn't want Russia to go down in history that way. Besides, nukes are stupid with our second strike capabilities just as it would be stupid of us to try and nuke Russia (for the same reason). Mutually assured destruction, remember?
swilton
(5,069 posts)able bodied young men, they're doing a lot better than Ukaraine's national military.
I don't know why you caveat your post as 'pro American' - when some of the best foreign policy scholars (John Mearsheimer) have characterized this latest foreign policy as a blunder of greatest proportions.
Other scholars have already characterized this as either a continuation of the old Cold War or a restart of a new Cold War (let history judge). Whatever, the US domestic economy is directly impacted by blunders such as this and there are many more worthy investments for the US budget that creating a war that the country can ill afford to pay for.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Start there.
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)Nice try. Putin destabilized Ukraine, everyone who isn't a Putin boot licker acknowledges that. In addition, Putin gave the rebels the equipment to shoot down a civilian airliner. Mistakes happen during war but some feel like it was intentional. If so, that makes Putin an accomplice to murder. Not like he hasn't murdered journalists, opposition party members, and generally anyone who gets in his way.
Pooka Fey
(3,496 posts)Interesting perspective on how to interpret geopolitics
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)PWOOF
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)nosireeeee, not us, no no no no no.
We just feed Victoria's cookies to the hungry and destitute Svoboda and Right Sektor.