Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:31 PM
rayofreason (2,259 posts)
Outrage as Egypt plans 'farewell intercourse law' so husbands can have sex with DEAD wives up to sixThis discussion thread was locked as off-topic by ScreamingMeemie (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum). Egyptian husbands will soon be legally allowed to have sex with their dead wives - for up to six hours after their death. The controversial new law is part of a raft of measures being introduced by the Islamist-dominated parliament. It will also see the minimum age of marriage lowered to 14 and the ridding of women's rights of getting education and employment. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2135434/Outrage-Egypt-plans-farewell-intercourse-law-husbands-sex-dead-wives-hours-AFTER-death.html#ixzz1tByGWF58 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2135434/Outrage-Egypt-plans-farewell-intercourse-law-husbands-sex-dead-wives-hours-AFTER-death.html You can't make this stuff up. The link to Al Arabiya seems to indicate that this is real. http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/04/25/210198.html
|
62 replies, 6998 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
| Author | Time | Post | |
| rayofreason | Apr 2012 | OP | |
| sakabatou | Apr 2012 | #1 | |
| Ecumenist | Apr 2012 | #2 | |
| roguevalley | Apr 2012 | #24 | |
| Scairp | Apr 2012 | #52 | |
| 2on2u | Apr 2012 | #3 | |
| TheWraith | Apr 2012 | #4 | |
| rayofreason | Apr 2012 | #7 | |
| muriel_volestrangler | Apr 2012 | #15 | |
| emilyg | Apr 2012 | #9 | |
| TheWraith | Apr 2012 | #20 | |
| riderinthestorm | Apr 2012 | #23 | |
| TheWraith | Apr 2012 | #22 | |
| derby378 | Apr 2012 | #5 | |
| eyewall | Apr 2012 | #6 | |
| rayofreason | Apr 2012 | #10 | |
| emilyg | Apr 2012 | #8 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #11 | |
| truthisfreedom | Apr 2012 | #12 | |
| usrname | Apr 2012 | #13 | |
| marble falls | Apr 2012 | #14 | |
| Ecumenist | Apr 2012 | #18 | |
| harmonicon | Apr 2012 | #21 | |
| Ecumenist | Apr 2012 | #26 | |
| marble falls | Apr 2012 | #40 | |
| Ecumenist | Apr 2012 | #49 | |
| anon3 | Apr 2012 | #28 | |
| emilyg | Apr 2012 | #34 | |
| marble falls | Apr 2012 | #41 | |
| DCBob | Apr 2012 | #16 | |
| Odin2005 | Apr 2012 | #17 | |
| Auntie Bush | Apr 2012 | #19 | |
| Ian David | Apr 2012 | #25 | |
| tawadi | Apr 2012 | #27 | |
| Justice wanted | Apr 2012 | #29 | |
| unkachuck | Apr 2012 | #30 | |
| babydollhead | Apr 2012 | #39 | |
| Ecumenist | Apr 2012 | #50 | |
| tabasco | Apr 2012 | #31 | |
| man4allcats | Apr 2012 | #32 | |
| Ruby the Liberal | Apr 2012 | #33 | |
| Kablooie | Apr 2012 | #35 | |
| lunatica | Apr 2012 | #36 | |
| 6000eliot | Apr 2012 | #37 | |
| Vinca | Apr 2012 | #38 | |
| mikeytherat | Apr 2012 | #42 | |
| pampango | Apr 2012 | #44 | |
| Maine-ah | Apr 2012 | #43 | |
| Javaman | Apr 2012 | #45 | |
| emilyg | Apr 2012 | #47 | |
| truebrit71 | Apr 2012 | #46 | |
| Arkana | Apr 2012 | #48 | |
| truthisfreedom | Apr 2012 | #51 | |
| lovuian | Apr 2012 | #53 | |
| harun | Apr 2012 | #54 | |
| BadGimp | Apr 2012 | #55 | |
| Prometheus Bound | Apr 2012 | #56 | |
| PSPS | Apr 2012 | #57 | |
| oberliner | Apr 2012 | #58 | |
| neovente | Apr 2012 | #59 | |
| 3waygeek | Apr 2012 | #60 | |
| Douglas Carpenter | Apr 2012 | #61 | |
| ScreamingMeemie | Apr 2012 | #62 |
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:34 PM
sakabatou (29,090 posts)
1. ...
|
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:34 PM
Ecumenist (5,646 posts)
2. WTF?? OMG! What the hell is going on in Egypt? NECROPHILIA IS BEING LEGALISED???!!!
|
Last edited Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:35 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) HOW ISLAMIC IS THAT? NEVER MIND, let me tell you...IT ISN'T!!!! What kind of undercover freaks are making laws there?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Ecumenist (Reply #2)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:48 PM
roguevalley (32,809 posts)
24. this isn't about religion or love. this is about desecration and
|
power. this is about perverts using ideals, religion and morals to implement something that they like. This has nothing to do with anything but someone's perversion.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to roguevalley (Reply #24)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 07:43 PM
Scairp (2,250 posts)
52. This isn't real
|
Islam would never endorse necrophilia. A rumour to make someone's head explode. I think it must have worked.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:35 PM
2on2u (1,843 posts)
3. Well.... I guess if they were really deeply in love.....
|
NOT. This is the most WTFecked thing I have read in the last ten minutes.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:36 PM
TheWraith (24,331 posts)
4. Yeah, I'm going to call bullshit on this. It's the Daily Mail for fuck's sake. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to TheWraith (Reply #4)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:42 PM
rayofreason (2,259 posts)
7. That is what I thought at first...
|
...but I followed the Al Arabiya link and it checks out.
Like I wrote, some stuff you just can't make up. Like "Foreskin Man", which I though was fake as well, until it checked out. www.foreskinman.com/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-derrick/foreskin-man-comicbook-at_b_871262.html |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Reply #7)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:58 PM
muriel_volestrangler (65,354 posts)
15. It does all depend on the one columnist, if you check all it says
|
"According to Egyptian columnist Amro Abdul Samea in al-Ahram, Talawi’s message included..."
The TV anchor then "referred to Abdul Samea’s article in his daily show" and asked "is there really a draft law in this regard? Are there people thinking in this manner?", which does imply that they haven't got another source for this yet. The Moroccan cleric made the claim about sex after death last year. But it seems to be Abdul Samea who knows about this (and, according to him, the head of the National Council for Women, who he says sent a message to the Speaker). |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to TheWraith (Reply #4)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:43 PM
emilyg (22,742 posts)
9. Other places posted this, too.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to emilyg (Reply #9)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:24 PM
TheWraith (24,331 posts)
20. Maybe, but it's ridiculously easy for a "news" story to spread this way.
|
I've seen it happen often; one website runs a story, then many, many others pick it up from there without independently verifying it.
Not to mention I don't even trust US journalists covering a US story to get the facts straight, let alone a British tabloid reporting on Egypt. We'll probably find out that this is a kook bill supported by one guy, the Egyptian Alan West or something. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to TheWraith (Reply #20)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:43 PM
riderinthestorm (13,178 posts)
23. The Al Arabiya link seems like it's a legit story. And they're not known for sensationalism nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to TheWraith (Reply #4)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:42 PM
TheWraith (24,331 posts)
22. Turns out the original "source" is an unsourced opinion column by a pro-Mubarak writer.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:39 PM
derby378 (28,490 posts)
5. Fuck ME, this is the DUMBEST fucking law I have heard of in a long, long time...
|
...and yes, I am aware of the new Arizona law that declares a woman to be legally pregnant two weeks before sperm meets egg.
Egypt had a revolution for THIS?!? Why were we backing these sick bastards? |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:40 PM
eyewall (660 posts)
6. It sounds like the kind of lunacy we've seen in our
|
politics is being experienced globally. Things are getting very weird.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to eyewall (Reply #6)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:46 PM
rayofreason (2,259 posts)
10. No. Nothing, anywhere...
|
...is this fucked up.
At the rate things are going, in a year's time Egypt will make Somalia look like a tolerant, tranquil spot. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:42 PM
emilyg (22,742 posts)
8. Disgusting.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:48 PM
rl6214 (7,434 posts)
11. That's just disgusting.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:48 PM
truthisfreedom (17,678 posts)
12. At least Bill Maher, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert
|
Will have something they can get some serious groans with.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:53 PM
usrname (398 posts)
13. But do women get to have sex with
|
their dead husband, up to six hours after death? I imagine rigor mortis would give hubby a good boner for that time.
(There's even evidence that a dead male can still orgasm and ejaculate, as long as the nerves have not died.) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 07:53 PM
marble falls (1,910 posts)
14. Why are we even discussing this crap? True or not, so the freak what? ....
|
You'll be able to see it headline on the cover of "The Enquirer", on display at discerning grocery checkout lines everywhere. There are "Christians" with even scarier beliefs than that. This is either for the shock value or hatred of Muslims in general.
Hell we might be electing a son of polygamous "Christians" who believe in performing and has himself performed baptisms, marriages, sealings for the dead into his religion and he believes he will become perfected and a god himself with his own little universe, that G*d is really one of many and progenitor of many universes. this is borderline hate speech, meaning to incite disgust and hatred on an entire class of people due to law being changed somewhere in a single city. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to marble falls (Reply #14)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:08 PM
Ecumenist (5,646 posts)
18. HUH? First of all, we're in no danger of EVER SEEING A PRESIDENT with MAGICAL UNDERWEAR
|
Last edited Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:16 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Secondly, the OP was simply posting something that's FACT, ( As much as it might upset you), which is one of the primary activities here in DU and thirdly, THIS IS NOT GOING TO RESULT IN ANY ANTI-MUSLIM actions anywhere. This is not only UNSLAMIC AS HELL but clearly the machinations of a sexually perverted idiot masquerading as an Imam. Get a grip, it ain't that serious...
This isn't meant to incite any sort of disgust nor hatred. However, it does show some issues with respect for human beings on the part of SOME of the new governmental figures in Egypt. Trust me, most Egyptians WILL NOT GO FOR THIS NOR WILL THEY ROLL OVER AND ACCEPT THIS AT ALL! |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Ecumenist (Reply #18)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:39 PM
harmonicon (11,938 posts)
21. That's not true. Eisenhower had magical underwear.
|
It was secretly developed by the military and top German scientists during and after WWII. It allowed him to time-travel, remote-view, and clearly see the lizard people for what they are. I heard about it on Coast to Coast AM.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to harmonicon (Reply #21)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:50 PM
Ecumenist (5,646 posts)
26. I didn't know we already have had a President "Magic Draws", WOW! Who knew?
|
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Ecumenist (Reply #18)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:17 AM
marble falls (1,910 posts)
40. Mitt stands about a 50/50 chance in everybody's polls...
|
tap dancing all around it all you want, but this was put up to either titilate or demean Islam.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to marble falls (Reply #40)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 04:21 PM
Ecumenist (5,646 posts)
49. First of all, you obviously DON'T KNOW WHO THE HELL YOU TALKING TO BECAUSE i'm the last
|
Last edited Fri Apr 27, 2012, 04:26 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) person on DU to be accused of demeaning Islam, CONSIDERING THAT THE BLACK PART MY MOTHER'S FAMILY IS NORTH AFRICAN FROM MOROCCO, TUNISIA AND SOMALIA!!! I know what the fuck I'm talking about in Regards to ISLAM and it's clear that you don't. Secondly, PARSE crap about mittens all you want, that idiot has as much chance of being elected as I do having a vasectomy. His own party are eating one another alive because he vehemently HATED by alot of the "right".
HALLUCINATE, OBFUSCATE AND FANTASISE MUCH? Who the hell is 'EVERYBODY"? Tell that to someone who doesn't pay attention to polls nor has critical thinking. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to marble falls (Reply #14)
anon3 This message was hidden by Jury decision.
Response to marble falls (Reply #14)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 11:53 PM
emilyg (22,742 posts)
34. Got your Christian dig in - didn't you.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to emilyg (Reply #34)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:23 AM
marble falls (1,910 posts)
41. You missed my point, I am angry at the anti-Muslim dig ....
|
and I am a christian on this site that's taken all sorts of abuse here for being "Christian". I question the point of this post. This wasn't put up as an anthropological study, it was put up to hold a whole class of people to ridicule.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:00 PM
DCBob (14,773 posts)
16. That is seriously sick.
|
Hard to believe this is real.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:05 PM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)
17. Oh, YUCK!!!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:18 PM
Auntie Bush (15,264 posts)
19. And our tax dollars helped put these assholes in power! Sickening! disgusting!
|
These people are animals! Oh those poor Muslim women! I hope we never spend another dollar to support ANY Muslim country! Let's get out of the middle east.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:50 PM
Ian David (68,441 posts)
25. Computer says Nooo....
|
Egypt 'necrophilia law'? Hooey, utter hooey.
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0426/Egypt-necrophilia-law-Hooey-utter-hooey Today, Egypt's state-owned Al Ahram newspaper published an opinion piece by Amr Abdul Samea, a past stalwart supporter of the deposed Hosni Mubarak, that contained a bombshell: Egypt's parliament is considering passing a law that would allow husbands to have sex with their wives after death. It was soon mentioned in an English language version of Al-Arabiya and immediately started zipping around social-networking sites. By this afternoon it had set news sites and the rest of the Internet on fire. It has every thing: The yuck factor, "those creepy Muslims" factor, the lulz factor for those with a sick sense of humor. The non-fact-checked Daily Mail picked it up and reported it as fact. Then Andrew Sullivan, who has a highly influential blog but is frequently lax about fact-checking, gave it a boost with an uncritical take. The Huffington Post went there, too. There's of course one problem: The chances of any such piece of legislation being considered by the Egyptian parliament for a vote is zero. And the chance of it ever passing is less than that. In fact, color me highly skeptical that anyone is even trying to advance a piece of legislation like this through Egypt's parliament. I'm willing to be proven wrong. It's possible that there's one or two lawmakers completely out of step with the rest of parliament. Maybe. <snip> Stories like this are already a reminder of the downside of the Internet. It makes fact-checking and monitoring easier. But the proliferation of aggregation sites, newsy blog sites, and the general erosion of editorial standards (and on-the-ground reporters to do the heavy lifting) also spreads silliness faster than it ever could before. More: http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0426/Egypt-necrophilia-law-Hooey-utter-hooey |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 08:52 PM
tawadi (1,994 posts)
27. Repulsive. eom
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 09:10 PM
Justice wanted (2,657 posts)
29. . . .
|
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 09:28 PM
unkachuck (6,295 posts)
30. alright, clue me....
|
....why would you want to have sex with your dead wife? I barely want to have sex with my live one....
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to unkachuck (Reply #30)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:17 AM
babydollhead (1,866 posts)
39. that's funny!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to unkachuck (Reply #30)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 04:22 PM
Ecumenist (5,646 posts)
50. LOL!! UnkaChuck...
|
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 09:38 PM
tabasco (18,296 posts)
31. Frightening to see so many gullible DUers.
|
Jesus.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 09:40 PM
man4allcats (3,825 posts)
32. Ah yes - religion
|
It makes so much sense. Yeah right!
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Thu Apr 26, 2012, 09:48 PM
Ruby the Liberal (23,509 posts)
33. Well, you can make this stuff up and in this case, looks like they did.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:25 AM
Kablooie (8,857 posts)
35. Somehow that idea for a law never occurred to me.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 06:40 AM
lunatica (28,852 posts)
36. Oh puke!
|
Last edited Fri Apr 27, 2012, 06:42 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Whether this is true or not the idea is puke worthy.
edited for skepticism |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 06:45 AM
6000eliot (4,267 posts)
37. Horseshit. I don't believe that such a law is being considered.
|
I also don't believe that there would be much of a demand for it.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 06:48 AM
Vinca (22,005 posts)
38. Well ick . . . ick, ick, ick, ick, ick.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:42 AM
mikeytherat (6,823 posts)
42. "A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." - Mark Twain
|
But since they're scary Mooslims, who really cares, right?
mikey_the_rat |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to mikeytherat (Reply #42)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 09:25 AM
pampango (13,986 posts)
44. "It has every thing: The yuck factor, "those creepy Muslims" factor, the lulz factor for those with
|
a sick sense of humor." (From the CSM article.)
Indeed. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:42 AM
Maine-ah (9,866 posts)
43. got a question here....
|
I'm wondering, how long a woman's released egg survives in her body after death, and if it's possible to fertilize an egg in that period of time? In other words, is it possible to basically impregnate a woman in that 6 hour time frame, only to have the fertilized egg to die?
and IF this story is true, I think this would be a good argument to make. Please don't make my thought turn into me being a fundie pro-lifer, I'm a full on pro-choice, woman....but if one was to try and make a point with crazy fundies, this one could work as long as there is some science to back it up. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 09:32 AM
Javaman (40,645 posts)
45. "Come on, Honey. Why the cold shoulder?" nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Javaman (Reply #45)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 12:58 PM
emilyg (22,742 posts)
47. snort heehee
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 11:24 AM
truebrit71 (16,912 posts)
46. Except they DID make this stuff up. See, this is why we shouldn't use the Daily Heil as a source...
|
..they are interested in semi-nude celebrities, homo-phobia, and hatred of all things 'foreign'....This is what the British version of Tea-Baggers read...
Personally I only use it for the semi-nude celebrities.... |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 01:05 PM
Arkana (22,234 posts)
48. Jesus Christ WHAT.
|
How disgusting.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 05:13 PM
truthisfreedom (17,678 posts)
51. THIS IS NOT NEWS, PEOPLE. It originated in an OP-ED piece in the mideast.
|
It was fabricated into a news piece in the UK. It's not gonna happen, and it is ONE PERSON'S OPINION that the law has even been considered.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:42 PM
lovuian (18,380 posts)
53. These men are SICK in the BRAIN
|
and it really shows how men must have control even after death
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:55 PM
harun (9,743 posts)
54. C'mon guys this is cleary BS.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 10:28 PM
BadGimp (1,927 posts)
55. Gives new meaning to "havin a cold one with the wife"
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Fri Apr 27, 2012, 11:00 PM
Prometheus Bound (3,489 posts)
56. I notice the OP Daily Mail link now brands this "a complete nonsense".
|
Who would believe this? Even the Daily Mail readers did not buy the original.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 07:30 AM
PSPS (4,196 posts)
57. Yes, this is a hoax.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 07:53 AM
oberliner (22,147 posts)
58. Egypt 'Farewell Intercourse' Law a Hoax by Mubarak Supporters?
|
Reports stemming from the Arab media indicating that Egypt's newly elected, Muslim-dominated Parliament has introduced a "farewell intercourse" law, which would allow husbands to have sex with their wives up to six hours after death, are being called fabrications planted by supporters of former President Hosni Mubarak.
http://global.christianpost.com/news/egypt-farewell-intercourse-law-a-hoax-by-mubarak-supporters-74025/ |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 08:17 AM
neovente (24 posts)
59. this looks like something the Onion would pull n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 08:50 AM
3waygeek (2,034 posts)
60. Makes sense to me...
|
anyone who can be pregnant two weeks before conceiving can obviously have sex six hours after her death.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 09:57 AM
Douglas Carpenter (15,145 posts)
61. Two stupid lies the right spread this week:No, there's no new pro-necrophilia law in Egypt, and the
|
EPA isn't "crucifying" all oil companies by Alex Pareene for salon.com
. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to rayofreason (Original post)
Sat Apr 28, 2012, 11:54 AM
ScreamingMeemie (60,872 posts)
62. Locking
|
This story has been proven to be a hoax.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads

