Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,360 posts)
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 07:51 AM Apr 2015

Aggressive Effort Underway by Democratic Leaders to Recruit Elizabeth Warren

Source: New York Observer

The Observer has obtained private email correspondence among a small group of Democratic insiders that reveals a plan to recruit Sen. Elizabeth Warren to challenge Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination for president.

The email, sent by Niko Elmaleh to a group that includes Andy Tobias, who has been the treasurer of the Democratic National Committee since Bill Clinton was president, and Jim Dean, the chairman of the nation’s largest political action committee, Burlington, Vt.-based Democracy for America. It was sent to Mr. Tobias’ personal email account and Mr. Dean’s DFA account.

Mr. Elmaleh, a reliable Democratic donor ($25,250 in 2012; $26,150 in 2008; and $31,000 in 2006) is the executive vice president of World Wide Holdings Corp, a New York City developer of luxury residential high-rise buildings that was founded by his father, Victor Elmaleh. Niko Elmaleh’s bio calls him an “environmentalist and patron of the arts” who supports charitable organizations including the Clinton Global Initiative, the League of Conservation of Voters, and Media Matters, the left-leaning media watchdog organization.

In his April 3, 2015, email to the small group, Mr. Elmaleh refers to his concern that a lack of a meaningful primary opponent will result in a stale and complacent candidate. He writes, “I think we should seriously consider as an excellent way to keep Hilary fresh in the public eye; Elizabeth Warren should run against her.”


Read more: http://observer.com/2015/04/aggressive-effort-underway-by-democratic-leaders-to-recruit-elizabeth-warren/

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Aggressive Effort Underway by Democratic Leaders to Recruit Elizabeth Warren (Original Post) brooklynite Apr 2015 OP
this guy is a tool. a major tool. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #1
He's not the tool. pangaia Apr 2015 #3
"although she could in the future" Makes no sense given her age -- especially if the assumption is karynnj Apr 2015 #6
This sounds like a plotline out of 'House of Cards' LynneSin Apr 2015 #11
No. I think he needs to patch things up with his wife first n/t VWolf Apr 2015 #18
She can't win yet. SheilaT Apr 2015 #13
Not even remotely comparable. geek tragedy Apr 2015 #14
Hope it backfires! Get her to run and then fate takes over!! Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2015 #17
this is a "nothing" article OKNancy Apr 2015 #2
First I've seen the rainbow "H-arrow." TinkerTot55 Apr 2015 #28
THanks OKNancy Apr 2015 #31
For labor and working families it would be some comfort to have someone who would try and level the midnight Apr 2015 #4
The idea is whacko but the premise is correct. n/t cosmicone Apr 2015 #5
Elizabeth Warren is not running. bvf Apr 2015 #7
Elizabeth Warren: ‘I am not running for president’ Botany Apr 2015 #8
She has made it clear she wasn't running... However.... midnight Apr 2015 #25
She definitely can be recruited; Reagan pulled it off. Buzz Clik Apr 2015 #9
Ms. Warren has stated time and time and time and time again that she's not running... groundloop Apr 2015 #10
Jim Webb could win. Larry Engels Apr 2015 #15
That letter is disgusting. Wants to use Elizabeth Warren as a tool. Fla Dem Apr 2015 #12
"If these are the great minds running the Democratic Party" wordpix Apr 2015 #22
I am sure Warren would be willing to be used as a tool. Sigh. Why is this even news? Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #16
Do you know how old Warren would be in 2024? former9thward Apr 2015 #30
Of course. 8 years older than this year. Correct, I think..... Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #33
9 years but whose counting .... former9thward Apr 2015 #35
Better not mention that to supporters of 73 year old Bernie Sanders. Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #36
I wish we would support & press-push Mrs. Warrens policies & bills. It must be very disheartening & Sunlei Apr 2015 #19
I would love to see Warren and Sanders included in the Presidential debates. jalan48 Apr 2015 #20
"to keep Hilary fresh"- how 'bout b/c she's embroiled in Clinton Found donor issues? wordpix Apr 2015 #21
They want a shill. Larry Engels Apr 2015 #23
Maybe Warren Should Run MosheFeingold Apr 2015 #24
Definitely she should run--Hilary railing against the 1% when she's a member is a farce wordpix Apr 2015 #26
Elizabeth could not possibly get elected. candelista Apr 2015 #27
so they said about Pres. Obama, too - I think she's very electable wordpix Apr 2015 #29
If she got the money, you wouldn't want to vote for her. candelista Apr 2015 #32
got my little toad toes crossed,,,,, Cryptoad Apr 2015 #34
WOW... I posted this GD ... Making my case for Warren to Run laserhaas Apr 2015 #37
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
1. this guy is a tool. a major tool.
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 08:05 AM
Apr 2015
Later in the email he reveals that after an appropriate “show” has been staged, Ms. Warren would be expected to bow out, having strengthened Ms. Clinton as a candidate. “If we can put on a ‘show’ featuring two of the most prominent progressives who are women, it will focus the attention of the bulk of voters on us.”

He then proceeds to land a few glancing blows on the other side’s candidates: “The Republicans’ show is a comic circus and would not compete with ours. Of course, this has to be carefully managed so that Warren can gracefully withdraw after performing this vital task. I don’t think she can win yet (although she could in the future).”

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
3. He's not the tool.
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 08:26 AM
Apr 2015

He is the hands on the tool.

It's clear even by the excerpt in the OP what he is after.

Dirtbag.

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
6. "although she could in the future" Makes no sense given her age -- especially if the assumption is
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 09:01 AM
Apr 2015

That Clinton becomes President. We are then looking 8 years into the future.

The only way I see her getting in if she "plays" Bobby Kennedy to O'Malley's Gene McCarthy. ie He does well enough in Iowa and NH to show that HRC can be beaten from the left. This is very unlikely because 1) this is not the world of 1968, 2) O'Malley is not McCarthy (ie a protest vote) and if he wins enough votes to beat or challenge Clinton (very unlikely) in the retail politics of Iowa - he will be the candidate. 3) Warren, though a rock star on the left, is not really in the position that Bobby Kennedy was.

Warren has said no many times - it would likely take something really big to change that. All I can think of is Clinton pulling out (right - after spending years of her time and that of others - not to mention, with all the attacks, it would be worse to decide not to run now than before she declared. Not going to happen. Nor is it likely that polls will show a huge loss to Republicans by her, but a win by someone else.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
13. She can't win yet.
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 10:39 AM
Apr 2015

I'm remembering a young, charismatic state senator from Illinois who wowed everyone with a speech at the DNC in 2004. Everyone said he had an amazing future ahead of him, but of course he couldn't win the big office yet.

Wonder whatever happened to him.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
14. Not even remotely comparable.
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 10:43 AM
Apr 2015

For one thing, by this time Obama had already announced, raised a bunch of money, and hired staff in all the early states.

The Warren thing in 2016 is a dead parrot.

OKNancy

(41,832 posts)
2. this is a "nothing" article
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 08:22 AM
Apr 2015

An old email by a bit of a whacko. Then nothing was done... the recipients declined.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
4. For labor and working families it would be some comfort to have someone who would try and level the
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 08:31 AM
Apr 2015

playing field.

Botany

(70,447 posts)
8. Elizabeth Warren: ‘I am not running for president’
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 09:17 AM
Apr 2015

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) pledged Wednesday to serve out her term and sought to pour cold water on the idea that she might run for president in 2016, according to the Boston Herald.

"I'm not running for president and I plan to serve out my term," Warren said at a news conference for Boston mayor-elect Marty Walsh, the Herald reported. Pressed further, Warren said she would "pledge to serve out my term."


Warren added: "I am not running for president. I am working as hard as I can to be the best (possible) senator I can be."

Warren's office confirmed the comments to Post Politics.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/12/04/elizabeth-warren-i-am-not-running-for-president/

**********
But she is a girl and you know they are really weak minded so she
really doesn't know what she is talking about.

midnight

(26,624 posts)
25. She has made it clear she wasn't running... However....
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 12:11 PM
Apr 2015

"It's a Woman's Prerogative to Change Her Mind"


I know she doesn't have the money....but...

A women's got to do what a women's got to do...



groundloop

(11,514 posts)
10. Ms. Warren has stated time and time and time and time again that she's not running...
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 10:14 AM
Apr 2015

We really need to quit focusing on Elizabeth Warren as the only possible alternative to Hillary and come up with someone else. I'd absolutely love to see Warren run, but it's pretty apparent that it's not going to happen. I fear we're weakening ourselves if we can't get Elizabeth Warren out of our heads as a presidential candidate.

Fla Dem

(23,590 posts)
12. That letter is disgusting. Wants to use Elizabeth Warren as a tool.
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 10:38 AM
Apr 2015

From the letter........

“The Republicans’ show is a comic circus and would not compete with ours. Of course, this has to be carefully managed so that Warren can gracefully withdraw after performing this vital task. I don’t think she can win yet."

If these are the great minds running the Democratic Part, I fear for our future.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
22. "If these are the great minds running the Democratic Party"
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 11:50 AM
Apr 2015

lol, these "great minds" are the reason I'm not contributing a cent to any Dem orgs except my own small town Dem Town Comm. of which I'm a member. I'm giving to individual candidates.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
16. I am sure Warren would be willing to be used as a tool. Sigh. Why is this even news?
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 10:54 AM
Apr 2015

100% chance of President Clinton, or 50/50 chance of President Clown Car if it is versus Warren?

Who wants to take the sure thing of Hillary and Big Dog in the WH and who wants to gamble with Armegeddon?

President Warren 2024 to 2032, and the Obama Revolution will be complete.

Look at the long range picture, our children deserve it.

former9thward

(31,941 posts)
35. 9 years but whose counting ....
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 02:56 PM
Apr 2015

Which would make her too old to run. The American people would never go for someone that old.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
19. I wish we would support & press-push Mrs. Warrens policies & bills. It must be very disheartening &
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 11:02 AM
Apr 2015

a 'job' distraction for her, when the only questions she gets are, "will you run for president".

jalan48

(13,842 posts)
20. I would love to see Warren and Sanders included in the Presidential debates.
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 11:15 AM
Apr 2015

The public needs to be exposed to a wider range of ideas and opinions about how our country could and should operate.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
21. "to keep Hilary fresh"- how 'bout b/c she's embroiled in Clinton Found donor issues?
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 11:48 AM
Apr 2015

Million$ from foreign donors including a uranium company and sponsors paying $500k for a Bill Clinton speech. Not a political problem at all. We just want "an excellent way to keep Hilary fresh in the public eye." YEah, right

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
26. Definitely she should run--Hilary railing against the 1% when she's a member is a farce
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 12:14 PM
Apr 2015

Hil speaking out against the abuses of the greedy class from which the Clinton Found and Clintons themselves have become rich---bad optics and I won't vote for her.

I don't need a billionaire representing me.

 

candelista

(1,986 posts)
27. Elizabeth could not possibly get elected.
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 12:24 PM
Apr 2015

Where is she going to get a billion dollars for her campaign? Not from the billionaires.

Disclaimer: this is not an endorsement of Hillary. Or billionaires.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
29. so they said about Pres. Obama, too - I think she's very electable
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 12:33 PM
Apr 2015

and now is her time to jump in!

 

candelista

(1,986 posts)
32. If she got the money, you wouldn't want to vote for her.
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 02:32 PM
Apr 2015

She would be bought and paid for. But the whole thing isn't going to happen.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
37. WOW... I posted this GD ... Making my case for Warren to Run
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 06:45 PM
Apr 2015

If Hillary wasn't in the mix ---- EveryBody ---- would be clamoring for Warren...


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026583881

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Aggressive Effort Underwa...