Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,052 posts)
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 01:15 AM Oct 2015

Judge rules that anti-Planned Parenthood activists can give Congress undercover videos

Source: Politico

Heading off a potential constitutional clash, a federal judge ruled Tuesday that anti-abortion activists can hand over unreleased undercover sting videos and outtakes subpoenaed by a House committee even though a court order remains in place barring those activists from releasing the materials publicly.

U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick said Tuesday that he would not prevent activist David Daleiden and the Center for Medical Progress from complying with the subpoena issued last month by House Oversight and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz.

"Congress has the power to investigate, and it is not up to the courts to go beyond the narrow confines of determining that the committee’s inquiry is in its province. ... Nor may courts assume (and I do not assume) that an unworthy purpose prompts a congressional act," Orrick wrote in his order (posted here). "And, importantly in our Constitutional system, there are three equal branches of government, and courts should refrain from creating needless friction with a coordinate branch of government."

The videos in dispute are part of a broader set of videos that have prompted national controversy and led to Republican calls for the defunding of Planned Parenthood. The footage already made public shows doctors and other clinic personnel discussing details of fetal tissue donation practices while dining at restaurants.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/10/planned-parenthood-abortion-videos-undercover-214486



Orrick is an Obama nominee to the US District Court for the Northern District of California, in San Francisco.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
2. Oh I'm certain they will bring it all. All that backs their bullshit and
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 08:41 AM
Oct 2015

leave the rest behind in their delete bin on some hard drive in the landfill.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
3. i don't have a problem
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 09:06 AM
Oct 2015

if the videos origins can be corroborated. even if they are from anti abortion groups, put it all out there and let congress see it.

at least then they can sort out the pp from the other videos and straighten it out once and for all.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
6. congress is a joke, we know that
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:23 AM
Oct 2015

but if they can sort out the Planned Parenthood stuff from the material provided by other groups and at least get that straightened out, then maybe they'll leave Planned Parenthood alone.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
11. the videos apparently contain a string of clips
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 12:18 PM
Oct 2015

from at least two, maybe more, sources. the famous fiorina clip was not even pp footage. if the republicans want to hang their hat on shutting down pp for things they did not even do, then that video footage needs to be analyzed in full. then they can separate "this was said/done at pp" vs "this happened elsewhere."

and when it is shown with their own data that pp did nothing illegal, we can stop this nonsense about shutting the govt in order to try and defund them.

eggplant

(3,913 posts)
12. You don't have to "analyze the video" for that.
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 03:08 PM
Oct 2015

Multiple states Attorneys General have investigated and exonerated PP.

Dragging this out in hearings is just playing the Repub's game.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
13. in that case, they still won't "find" anything
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 04:23 PM
Oct 2015

they will also unfortunately waste taxpayer money, but since the overwhelming majority of people support some form of choice, they won't win any friends come election time but rather show their true extremist colors (ala "legimate rape" and so forth).


TexasBushwhacker

(20,214 posts)
7. I would demand that they are unedited though
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:36 AM
Oct 2015

It has been confirmed by experts that some if these videos have been edited. One thing that's especially problematic is that the camera is pointed at the Planned Parenthood staff, but any questions or from the spy are off camera. Could those questions or comments be changed or added? You bet! Could statements by Planned Parenthood staff when the camera isn't pointed at their face be changed or added? You bet!

The video that Carly Fiorina spoke of (so says the person who posted it on YouTube) shows a woman giving birth to a living but hopelessly tiny baby. It's more likely this was a miscarriage. The audio was removed. If audio can be removed, it can be changed.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
10. i agree
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 12:12 PM
Oct 2015

unedited and source verified. and even if they show unfortunate events such as a misscarriage, at least we can get the "planned parenthood is selling baby parts" issue off the daily news.

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
5. "Nor may courts assume (and I do not assume) that an unworthy purpose prompts a congressional act,"
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:21 AM
Oct 2015

Heh.

24601

(3,962 posts)
8. William Orrick was appointed to the courts by President Obama. Previously he served in the Obama
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 10:45 AM
Oct 2015

Administration, in the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.

Judi Lynn

(160,622 posts)
14. I went to get his photo to take a hard squint at his face, found this unexpected message:
Wed Oct 7, 2015, 05:31 PM
Oct 2015

[center][/center]

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge rules that anti-Pla...