Spike Lee: Female Students Should Go On Sex Strike To Combat Campus Rape
Last edited Thu Nov 26, 2015, 07:03 PM - Edit history (2)
Source: UK Guardian Thursday 26 November 2015 07.32 EST
Spike Lee has said a sex strike by women could help prevent sexual harassment on US college campuses. A recent survey of US college campuses found that nearly a quarter of female students had experienced some form of unwanted sexual advance. More than 10% of respondents said they had been physically assaulted or threatened with physical assault by men in pursuit of sex.
I think a sex strike could really work on college campuses where theres an abundance of sexual harassment or date rapes, Lee told Stephen Colbert on The Late Show on US television. Second semester its going to happen. Once people coming back from Christmas and some stuff jumps off, theres going to be sex strikes in universities and college campuses across this country.
The director was discussing his new film Chi-Raq with Colbert. Based on Lysistrata, a satire by Aristophanes, the film follows a group of women on the south side of Chicago who decide to fight gun crime by withholding sex from their men. In real life, the film has reportedly inspired a group of 37 women to follow suit.
Lee was criticised by Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel earlier this year for appropriating Chi-Raq a rap slang term used to compare the violence in Chicagos Englewood neighbourhood to that seen in the Iraq war zone as his films title. In the interview, Colbert cited statistics that showed that since 2001 more Americans had died in Chicago than in Iraq and Afghanistan combined.
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/nov/26/spike-lee-female-students-should-go-on-sex-strike-to-combat-campus
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)and I'm not convinced it's an improvement.
I love Spike Lee, saw him on Colbert the other night; but this makes a better
movie script than it does a serious tactic to improve relations between genders.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)this sort of thing. Maybe banning fraternities will be a good start.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Our rape culture is just one aspect of our bully culture, "might makes right",
where helpless homeless people are often set on fire at night or beat-up for
no reason other than sadistic 'enjoyment' by the same kind of assholes that
are flocking to Trump rallies.
Cops who routinely murder black people at-will are also notorious wife-beaters.
There is clearly a sick ugly violent power-hungry segment of our population that
needs to be somehow confronted, countered, and defanged ...
I don't know the answer, but wish I did. I do applaud Spike for at least positing
some way to stop the raping on campuses, and forcing us to think about it.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Some are dedicated to philanthropy, for instance.
Warpy
(111,249 posts)so the Lysistrata strategy is always going to be a total failure.
I guess women aren't supposed to have sex drives, it's so unfeminine.
For the impaired,
Skittles
(153,150 posts)perpetuates the idea that sex is something women give ("put out" and men take
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)nt
still_one
(92,164 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)Much easier to go after the victims through arbitration than to have the police involved, which adds unwanted stats (which universities are women most likely to get raped) and the press.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)That implies that rape and assault victims were ever willing participants.
enough
(13,256 posts)Jeroen
(1,061 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)If you don't finish your dinner, Bobby, you don't get dessert!
Spike's comment surely came from good intentions, but it sounds like a klinker to me, too. "Not raping" isn't something you do to get a prize. It's supposed to be the default.
Thanks for saving me the trouble of having to type out the angry screed percolating in my head after reading the OP
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Also sex and rape are different actions. Ask any women who was raped if she considered it "having sex"
It's expressed as a negative for women and a value positive for men.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Thinking sex is simply a reward that's owed to them is part of the problem with some guys. Also, if a young woman enjoys a healthy sexual relationship with someone she shouldn't be pressed to deny herself that physical intamacy.
Its not a reward? Then why the fuck I am cleaning dishes?
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Nihil
(13,508 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)sarge43
(28,941 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Wtf spike.
denbot
(9,899 posts)I thought it was a little crude myself..
On Fri Nov 27, 2015, 03:44 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Yeah but spike thinks all we have to offer is pussy.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1272284
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Not trying to be a prude, but there are several here that find this word offensive. Poster could have used the word "sex", just like other posters have.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Nov 27, 2015, 03:55 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: We can't hide everything that someone could conceivably find offensive. This isn't Yale.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A little crude, but in the context, it's a good point.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter's name must be Legion to claim "several" are offended by the word "pussy." No trying here about prudery; the alert has achieved it. I refuse to hide this post because someone, somewhere has clutched their skirts in horror at the sight of a WORD. Grow up.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not worth an alert never mind a hide.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: There are other connotations for the human female body parts without getting vulgar.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)lol
The whole idea it is a reward for men is BS. the very font of sexism.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)sarge43
(28,941 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)Spike Lee should be ashamed.
tishaLA
(14,176 posts)To say nothing of its stupidity for the reasons others have mentioned.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)A sex strike doesn't even come close to addressing the root causes of rape hence its a futile gesture.
There are other, better ways to address the problem of rape
mantis49
(813 posts)Rape isn't about sex. It's about power and subjugation.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)The whole humor behind the Lysistrata was that Athenians would have found the concept of women refusing sex absurd (they were considered more sex-driven than men). Imagine a modern US comedy based on men boycotting sex and you get the idea.
thucythucy
(8,047 posts)that in Lysistrata the women were striking to end the war between Athens and Sparta, and they also occupied the Acropolis. So in a modern context this would be American (and other) women striking to end the Middle East and Afghan wars, and occupying the Pentagon. But as you say, an entirely different social context.
And I agree with all the other posters on how, in the context of rape, the comment is both inappropriate and dumb, for all the reasons listed.
nsd
(2,406 posts)Response to big_dog (Original post)
orpupilofnature57 This message was self-deleted by its author.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)"Friendzone":
The concept that women are vending-machines where you can buy sex in exchange for friendly behaviour.
If you are in the "Friendzone", that means the vending-machine is broken and doesn't give you the treat, no matter how many coins you put in there. (You have paid for this, dammit! You deserve it!)
This strike would lead to a similar situation:
Men get sex in exchange for outwardly displaying a certain behaviour. It would not affect the attitude men have towards sexuality.
Just an example: The tips men's magazines give how to get laid:
- Look like this.
- Buy this.
- Say this.
- "Memorize these phrases to come across as smart and culturally sophisticated in conversations."
- Do all these things and you will get sex.
Add "Memorize these feminist phrases and casually mix them into conversations" and we are back right where we started.
The advice they never give is:
- Read this.
- Think about this.
- Let this piece of art transform you, let it alter your thinking and widen your horizon.
- Become the sort of man women want, instead of merely pretending to be that sort of man.
A sex-strike would turn sex into a commodity that women own and that they refuse to share with the rest of society. Just what misogynists have been thinking all along...
Matariki
(18,775 posts)yours? It needs to get added to Urban Dictionary. Or better yet, Websters.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)get the red out
(13,462 posts)The guys that wait on yes aren't the problem. Rape is about power, not two consenting adults.
WhoWoodaKnew
(847 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)I believe females have something called "hormones" as well as males.
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I am not trying to say that all men are bad, but it would be far better to teach men to respect women than to refuse to have sex with men. Sex is not the problem; respect is the problem. It is very likely that women would not get raped if some men did not think sex was something they could take without asking. How many times have we heard of men joking about sleeping with women while they were drunk? How many times have we heard of men drugging women's drinks in order to sex with them without having to ask, or without having to be rejected?
We need to teach our sons that it is not a form of success to have sex with a drunk or drugged woman. We need to tell our sons that they are not entitled to sex with any woman they want to have sex with. We need to continue to tell our sons that if women say no they do not have to right to force the women to have sex with them.
At the end of the day, things might be much better in regards to sex if we just started talking more about sex with our kids. How many parents sit down and talk to their kids about sex before the kids go off to college? Maybe there would be less campus rape if we just all sat down with our kids and talked to them about what happens during sex and what to expect from sex.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)It would only stop those that would have stopped at 'no'. Unless I'm completely missing something.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Noticed your sig line--my husband takes that for MS fatigue. A life changer
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)I thought the idea behind rape was to get sex by any means necessary.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I'm missing the connection here
olddad56
(5,732 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,338 posts)That would seem like a reasonable compromise, Spike, ya genius.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Old Union Guy
(738 posts)Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)dogknob
(2,431 posts)jamzrockz
(1,333 posts)His next movie premise is based on this sort of action by women. The movie Chiraq is about girl friends and wives of gang bangers withholding sex in order to end the street violence.
It is an idea that can work if you husband/boyfriend is a gang banger but absolutely useless one if they are not one. Punish a person for something they are not responsible for and they will hold it against you and start looking for a new mate.
This whole talk is not out of the concern of rape victims but an attempt to sell more movie tickets
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I doubt refusing to have sex would work with gang banger boyfriends/husbands. I think the women who would try to refuse would get raped, beaten, and/or dumped. I do not think Chicago type gang bangers would have a problem cheating on their girlfriends and wives and I do not think they would have a problem finding anyone to have sex with.
It is a bad idea all around. It may make a good story, but it would not work in the real world. There are too many men who would be willing to force themselves on women. Even if the men chose not to force themselves on the girlfriends and wives there are too many women who would be willing to have sex with the men who are not getting sex from their girlfriends and wives.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)If they stuck with it for a couple of years, the frats might die out.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Apparently sex with spike is work for his partner